Obesity Surgery

, Volume 21, Issue 7, pp 841–849 | Cite as

Bariatric Surgery versus Lifestyle Interventions for Morbid Obesity—Changes in Body Weight, Risk Factors and Comorbidities at 1 Year

  • Catia Martins
  • Magnus Strømmen
  • Ola A. Stavne
  • Randi Nossum
  • Ronald Mårvik
  • Bård Kulseng
Clinical Research

Abstract

Background

Few studies have looked at non-surgical alternatives for morbid obese patients. This study aims to compare 1-year weight loss and changes in risk factors and comorbidities after bariatric surgery and three conservative treatments.

Methods

Patients with morbid obesity (BMI > 40 or BMI > 35 kg/m2 plus comorbidities) on waiting list for bariatric surgery, were non-randomly allocated to (A) bariatric surgery or to one of three conservative treatments; (B) residential intermittent program; (C) commercial weight loss camp and (D) hospital outpatient program. Body weight, risk factors and comorbidities were assessed at baseline and 1 year.

Results

Of 206 participants, 179 completed the study. All treatments resulted in significant weight loss, but bariatric surgery (40 ± 14 kg, 31 ± 9%) led to the largest weight loss (P < 0.0001). There were no differences in weight loss between B and C (22 ± 13 kg, 15 ± 8% vs. 18 ± 12 kg, 13 ± 8%), but these resulted in larger weight loss compared with D (7 ± 10 kg, 5 ± 8%). There were no differences in changes in total or LDL cholesterol, triacylglycerols or glucose between groups; however, the increase in HDL cholesterol was significantly larger in groups A and C. There were no differences in comorbidities resolution between groups A and B, C and D combined (except hypertension, which was better in group A).

Conclusion

In conclusion, although bariatric surgery leads to a greater weight loss at 1 year compared with conservative treatment, in patients with morbid obesity, clinical significant weight loss and similar improvements in risk factors and comorbidities resolution can also be achieved with lifestyle interventions.

Keywords

Obesity Weight loss Lifestyle modifications Obesity surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight—fact sheet N° 311. 2006.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, et al. The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. JAMA. 1999;282(16):1523–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Calle EE, Thun MJ, Petrelli JM, et al. Body-mass index and mortality in a prospective cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(15):1097–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    IOTF and EASO. Obesity in Europe—the case for action. 2002.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blackburn G. Effect of degree of weight loss on health benefits. Obes Res. 1995;3 Suppl 2:211s–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wadden TA, Butryn ML, Wilson C. Lifestyle modification for the management of obesity. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2226–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(26):2683–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Strømmen M, Kulseng B, Vedul-Kjelsås E, et al. Bariatric surgery or lifestyle intervention? An exploratory study of severely obese patients’ motivation for two different treatments. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2009;3:193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elder KA, Wolfe BM. Bariatric surgery: a review of procedures and outcomes. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2253–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anderson JW, Grant L, Gotthelf L, et al. Weight loss and long-term follow-up of severely obese individuals treated with an intense behavioral program. Int J Obes. 2007;31(3):488–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anderson JW, Conley SB, Nicholas AS. One hundred pound weight losses with an intensive behavioral program: changes in risk factors in 118 patients with long-term follow-up. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;86(2):301–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18(499):502.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Christiansen T, Brunn JM, Madsen EL, et al. Weight loss maintenance in severely obese adults after an intensive lifestyle intervention: 2- to 4-year follow-up. Obesity. 2007;15(2):413–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ryan D, Johnson W, Myers V, et al. Non-surgical weight loss for extreme obesity: results of the Louisiana Obese Subjects Study (LOSS). Obesity Facts. 2009;2(Supl. 2):23.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bjorvell H, Rossner S. A ten-year follow-up of weight change in severely obese subjects treated in a combined behavioural modification programme. Int J Obes. 1992;16:623–5.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shapiro JR, Stout AL, Musante GJ. “Structure-size me”: weight and health changes in a four week residential program. Eat Behav. 2006;7(3):229–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maffiulettil NA, Agosti F, Marinone PG, et al. Changes in body composition, physical performance and cardiovascular risk factors after a 3-week integrated body weight reduction program and after 1-y follow-up in severely obese men and women. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005;59:685–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sjostrom M, Karlsson AB, Kaati G, et al. A four week residential program for primary health care patients to control obesity and related heart risk factors: effective application of principles of learning and lifestyle change. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1999;53 Suppl 2:S72–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Perri MG, Nezu AM, Patti ET, et al. Effect of length of treatment on weight loss. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1989;57(3):450–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Latner JD, Stunkard AJ, Wilson GT, et al. Effective long-term treatment of obesity: a continuing care model. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24(7):893–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dalle Grave R, Melchionda N, Calugi S, et al. Continuous care in the treatment of obesity: an observational multicentre study. J Intern Med. 2005;258(3):265–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dale KS, McAuley KA, Taylor RW, et al. Determining optimal approaches for weight maintenance: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ. 2009;180(10):E39–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scotland SC, Larocque M. Early treatment response as a predictor of ongoing weight loss in obesity treatment. Br J Health Psychol. 2005;10(Pt 4):601–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Elfhag K, Rossner S. Who succeeds in maintaining weight loss? A conceptual review of factors associated with weight loss maintenance and weight regain. Obes Rev. 2005;6(1):67–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catia Martins
    • 1
    • 3
  • Magnus Strømmen
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ola A. Stavne
    • 4
  • Randi Nossum
    • 5
  • Ronald Mårvik
    • 3
  • Bård Kulseng
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Obesity Research Group, Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of MedicineNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of MedicineNorwegian University of Technology and ScienceTrondheimNorway
  3. 3.Centre for Obesity, Department of SurgerySt. Olav Hospital—Trondheim University HospitalTrondheimNorway
  4. 4.Røros Rehabilitation CentreRørøsNorway
  5. 5.Clinical ServicesSt. Olavs Hospital—Trondheim University HospitalTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations