Advertisement

Obesity Surgery

, Volume 19, Issue 12, pp 1617–1623 | Cite as

Conversion of Failed Vertical Banded Gastroplasty to Biliopancreatic Diversion, a Wise Option

  • Markos Daskalakis
  • Oliver Scheffel
  • Sophia Theodoridou
  • Rudolf A. WeinerEmail author
Clinical Research

Abstract

Background

Reoperations due to failures constitute an essential but challenging part of bariatric surgery practice today. The aim of this study was to evaluate the perioperative safety, efficacy, and postoperative quality of life in patients with biliopancreatic diversion (BPD), after failed vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG).

Methods

Twelve patients after failed or complicated VBG, eight females and four males, median age 45 years (range 39–52), median body mass index (BMI) 46.39 kg/m2 (range 25.89–69.37), who underwent conversion to BPD, were studied.

Results

Ten patients due to weight regain and two patients because of severe stenosis of the gastric pouch outlet were submitted in conversion to BPD. In eight (66.6%) patients the primary VBG had been followed by at least one revisional operation due to inadequate weight loss. The 10 patients after failed VBG, reached the lowest BMI recorded after VBG in just a year after BPD (p = 0.721 for the comparison between the two time points). The two patients with stomal stenosis regained weight in the first six postoperative months and remain stable since then. Regarding safety, one major perioperative complication (gastrojejunostomy stenosis) occurred. At a median follow-up of 21 months (range 12–30) six complications have been documented, including a case of incisional hernia, four cases of pouch gastritis and a case of intractable iron-deficiency anemia.

Conclusion

Our early results indicate that conversion of failed VBG to BPD is highly effective with acceptable morbidity. Our data show that the effect on weight is strongly dependent on the indication for the conversion. Conversion to BPD, in such a group of patients, is a wise alternative, since it may reduce operative risks.

Keywords

Bariatric surgery Vertical banded gastroplasty Conversion Revision Biliopancreatic diversion 

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors disclose no commercial interest in the subject of study.

References

  1. 1.
    Mason EE. Vertical banded gastroplasty for obesity. Arch Surg. 1982;117:701–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balsiger BM, Poggio JL, Mai J, et al. Ten and more years after vertical banded gastroplasty as primary operation for morbid obesity. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000;4:598–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    del Amo DA, Díez MM, Guedea ME, et al. Vertical banded gastroplasty: is it a durable operation for morbid obesity? Obes Surg. 2004;14:536–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pérez N, Baltasar A, Serra C, et al. Comparative analysis of vertical banded gastroplasty and duodenal switch at five years follow-up. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1061–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM Jr, DeMaria EJ, et al. Conversion of failed or complicated vertical banded gastroplasty to gastric bypass in morbid obesity. Am J Surg. 1996;171:263–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schouten R, van Dielen FM, van Gemert WG, et al. Conversion of vertical banded gastroplasty to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass results in restoration of the positive effect on weight loss and co-morbidities: evaluation of 101 patients. Obes Surg. 2007;17:622–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mognol P, Chosidow D, Marmuse JP. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after failed vertical banded gastroplasty. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1431–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van Dessel E, Hubens G, Ruppert M, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a re-do procedure for failed restricive gastric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1014–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scopinaro N. Biliopancreatic diversion: mechanisms of action and long-term results. Obes Surg. 2006;16:683–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Scopinaro N, Marinari GM, Camerini GB, et al. Specific effects of biliopancreatic diversion on the major components of metabolic syndrome: a long-term follow-up study. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2406–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scopinaro N, Papadia F, Camerini G, et al. A comparison of a personal series of biliopancreatic diversion and literature data on gastric bypass help to explain the mechanisms of resolution of type 2 diabetes by the two operations. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1035–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weiner S, Sauerland S, Fein M, et al. The Bariatric Quality of Life index: a measure of well-being in obesity surgery patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:538–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Deitel M, Gawdat K, Melissas J. Reporting weight loss 2007. Obes Surg. 2007;17:565–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brolin RE, Cody RP. Weight loss outcome of revisional bariatric operations varies according to the primary procedure. Ann Surg. 2008;248:227–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fernandez AZ Jr, DeMaria EJ, Tichansky DS, et al. Experience with over 3,000 open and laparoscopic bariatric procedures: multivariate analysis of factors related to leak and resultant mortality. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:193–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sugerman HJ, Wolfe LG, Sica DA, et al. Diabetes and hypertension in severe obesity and effects of gastric bypass-induced weight loss. Ann Surg. 2003;237:751–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    van Gemert WG, van Wersch MM, Greve JW, et al. Revisional surgery after failed vertical banded gastroplasty: restoration of vertical banded gastroplasty or conversion to gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 1998;8:21–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cohen R, Pinheiro JS, Correa JL, et al. Laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery: myths and facts. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:822–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nesset EM, Kendrick ML, Houghton SG, et al. A two-decade spectrum of revisional bariatric surgery at a tertiary referral center. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    SAGES Guidelines Committee. SAGES guideline for clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weller WE, Rosati C. Comparing outcomes of laparoscopic versus open bariatric surgery. Ann Surg. 2008;248:10–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scopinaro N, Marinari GM, Camerini G. Laparoscopic standard biliopancreatic diversion: technique and preliminary results. Obes Surg. 2002;12:241–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Baltasar A, Bou R, Miró J, et al. Laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: technique and initial experience. Obes Surg. 2002;12:245–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weiner RA, Blanco-Engert R, Weiner S, et al. Laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: three different duodeno-ileal anastomotic techniques and initial experience. Obes Surg. 2004;14:334–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gumbs AA, Pomp A, Gagner M. Revisional bariatric surgery for inadequate weight loss. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1137–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lim CS, Liew V, Talbot ML, et al. Revisional bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2008; doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9750-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sarr MG. Reoperative bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1909–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fox SR. The use of biliopancreatic diversion as a treatment for failed gastric partitioning in the morbidly obese. Obes Surg. 1991;1:89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Keshishian A, Zahriya K, Hartoonian T, et al. Duodenal switch is a safe operation for patients who have failed other bariatric operations. Obes Surg. 2004;14:1187–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Di Betta E, Mittempergher F, Di Fabio F, et al. Duodenal switch without gastric resection after failed gastric restrictive surgery for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2006;16:258–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Topart P, Becouarn G, Ritz P. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch or gastric bypass for failed gastric banding: retrospective study from two institutions with preliminary results. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:521–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cariani S, Nottola D, Grani S, et al. Complications after gastroplasty and gastric bypass as a primary operation and as a reoperation. Obes Surg. 2001;11:487–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    DeMaria EJ. Is gastric bypass superior for the surgical treatment of obesity compared with malabsorptive procedures? J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:401–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gracia JA, Martínez M, Elia M, et al. Obesity surgery results depending on technique performed: long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2009;19:432–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Menon T, Quaddus S, Cohen L. Revision of failed vertical banded gastroplasty to non-resectional Scopinaro biliopancreatic diversion: early experience. Obes Surg. 2006;16:1420–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Thoreson R, Cullen JJ. Indications and results of reversal of vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG). J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:2032–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markos Daskalakis
    • 1
  • Oliver Scheffel
    • 1
  • Sophia Theodoridou
    • 1
  • Rudolf A. Weiner
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Center for Minimal-Invasive Surgery, Department of General and Bariatric SurgeryKrankenhaus SachsenhausenFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations