Advertisement

Obesity Surgery

, Volume 19, Issue 8, pp 1197–1200 | Cite as

A Serious but Rare Complication of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: Bowel Obstruction Due to Caecal Volvulus

  • Afshin AgahiEmail author
  • Robin Harle
Case Report

Abstract

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is a widely performed surgical procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity. LAGB complications have declined since its development in the early 1990s. However, LAGB complications are still occurring and can sometimes be serious and life threatening. These complications are related either to the band or to the access port, such as band slippage or tubing disconnection, retrospectively. We report a rare case of bowel obstruction due to caecal volvulus caused by connecting tube used in LAP-BAND system in a bariatric operation, which obstructed a caecal loop, in a female who had undergone LAGB 2 years previously. Diagnosis of bowel obstruction was established with plain abdominal radiograph appearances. Follow-up abdominal computed tomography findings confirmed the diagnosis of caecal obstruction and revealed the underlying cause for this obstruction. Surgery was performed, and intraoperative examination demonstrated that connecting tube of the LAP-BAND system was a main causative factor. We can hypothesize that bowel obstruction secondary to LAGB operation may become frequently diagnosed as more LAGB operations performed worldwide. The emergence of many problems, such as this, can be minimized with enhancement in the development of better surgical materials, proper operative technique, and close postoperative management and follow-up.

Keywords

Bariatric surgery Gastroplasty Intestinal obstruction Intestinal volvulus Morbid obesity Postoperative complications 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Dr. Nicholas Brett from the Medical Imaging Department and Dr. Milan Djeric from General Surgical Unit of Royal Hobart Hospital for their assistance and support. We also would like to thank the Medical Imaging Department of Royal Hobart Hospital of Tasmania for their editorial assistance in the preparation of this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Livingston EH, Ko CY. Socioeconomic characteristics of the population eligible for obesity surgery. Surgery. 2004;135:288–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity 25–27 March. National institutes consensus development conference draft statement. Obes Surg. 1991;1:257–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Spivak H, Favretti F. Avoiding postoperative complications with the LAP-BAND system. Am J Surg. 2002;184:31S–7S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Favretti F, Cadiere GB, Segato G, et al. Laparoscopic banding: selection and technique in 830 patients. Obes Surg. 2002;12:385–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Belachew M, Belva PH, Desaive C. Long-term results of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for the treatment of morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2002;12:564–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vertruyen M. Experience with LAP-BAND system up to 7 years. Obes Surg. 2002;12:569–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, et al. Laparoscopic gastroplasty (adjustable silicone gastric banding). Semin Laparosc Surg. 2000;7:55–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    US Food and Drug Administration. The LAP-BAND Adjustable Gastric Banding system summary of safety and effectiveness data [Home page on the internet]. Rockvile, MD: Centre for Devices and Radiological Health; [updated 2002 March 6; cited 2008 Feb 15]. Available from https://doi.org/www.fda.gov/cdrh/pdf/p000008.htm
  9. 9.
    Keidar A, Carmon E, Szold A, et al. Port complications following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2005;15:361–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zappa MA, Micheletto G, Lattuada E, et al. Prevention of pouch dilatation after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2006;16:132–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stewart RM, Page CP, Brender J, et al. The incidence and risk of early postoperative small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg. 1987;154:643–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ellis H. Special forms of intestinal obstruction. In: Schwartz SI, Ellis H, editors. Maingot's abdominal operations. 9th ed. London: Prentice-Hall; 1990. p. 905–32.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grover NK, Gulati SM, Tagore NK, et al. Volvulus of the cecum and ascending colon. Am J Surg. 1973;125:672–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zappa MA, Lattuada E, Mozzi E, et al. An unusual complication of gastric Banding: recurrent small bowel obstruction caused by the connecting tube. Obes Surg. 2006;16:939–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shipkov CD, Uchikov AP, Uchikova EH. Small bowel obstruction by the silicone tube of the gastric band. Obes Surg. 2004;9:1280–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zengin K, Sen B, Ozben V, et al. Detachment of the connecting tube from the port and migration into jejunal wall. Obes Surg. 2006;16:206–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hartmann J, Scharfenberg M, Paul M, et al. Intracolonic penetration of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding tube. Obes Surg. 2006;16:203–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medical ImagingRoyal Hobart HospitalHobartAustralia
  2. 2.Department of General SurgeyRoyal Hobart HospitalHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations