Bariatric Surgery for Obesity: Surgical Approach and Variation in In-Hospital Complications in New York State
- 126 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the relationship between the surgical approach employed for adults undergoing bariatric surgery for obesity in New York State and in-hospital postoperative complications. Understanding the differences among surgical approaches in terms of the type, extent, and likelihood of postoperative complications and the patient characteristics associated with them, particularly as the annual volume of bariatric surgery increases, can inform decisions about the appropriate bariatric surgical approach for patients with particular characteristics.
Using New York’s inpatient hospital discharge database, we identified 8,413 adults who underwent a bariatric surgical procedure during calendar year 2006. The three most common bariatric surgical approaches were identified, postoperative complication rates and descriptive statistics for the demographic characteristics and comorbidities for patients of each surgical approach were generated, and a logistic regression model was constructed to predict the likelihood of postoperative complications.
Of all bariatric surgical patients, 8.1% experienced a postoperative complication, but complication rates varied dramatically across the surgical approaches, with open bypass patients having the highest complication rate and laparoscopic banding patients having the lowest rate. Different complications were associated with the three surgical approaches, as were the various patient demographic characteristics and comorbidities. The multivariate logistic regression indicated that open bypass patients were 5.4 times and laparoscopic bypass patients were 3.2 times more likely to experience a complication compared to laparoscopic banding patients.
Analyses of bariatric postoperative surgical complications must take into account the surgical approach employed.
KeywordsBariatric surgery Bariatric surgical approach Postoperative complications Obesity
- 7.Peeters A, O’Brien P, Laurie C. Does weight loss improve survival? Comparison of a bariatric surgical cohort with a community based control group. Obes Rev 2006;7 Suppl 2:95. (Abstract OP0193).Google Scholar
- 8.Busetto L, Mazza M, Mirabellie D. Total mortality in morbid obese patients treated with laparoscopic adjustable banding: a case–control study. Obese Rev 2006;7 Suppl 2:95. (Abstract OP0194).Google Scholar
- 12.Anderson T, Stokholm KH, Backer OG. Long-term (5 year) results after either horizontal gastroplasty or very-low-calorie diet for morbid obesity. Int J Obes 1988;12:277–84.Google Scholar
- 19.Mason EE, Renquist KE, Jiang D. Perioperative risks and safety of surgery for severe obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 1992;55:5735–65.Google Scholar
- 27.Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Maglione MA, et al. Pharmacological and surgical treatment of obesity. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 103 (prepared by the Southern-California-Rand Evidence-Based Practice Center, Santa Monica, CA, under contract number 290-02-0003.) AHRQ Publication No. 04-E028-2. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. July 2004.Google Scholar