Obesity Surgery

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 632–640 | Cite as

Results of Sleeve Gastrectomy—Data from a Nationwide Survey on Bariatric Surgery in Germany

  • Christine Stroh
  • D. Birk
  • R. Flade- Kuthe
  • M. Frenken
  • B. Herbig
  • S. Höhne
  • H. Köhler
  • V. Lange
  • K. Ludwig
  • R. Matkowitz
  • G. Meyer
  • P. Pick
  • Th. Horbach
  • S. Krause
  • L. Schäfer
  • M. Schlensak
  • E. Shang
  • T. Sonnenberg
  • M. Susewind
  • H. Voigt
  • R. Weiner
  • S. Wolff
  • A. M. Wolf
  • U. Schmidt
  • H. Lippert
  • Th. Manger
  • Bariatric Surgery Working Group
Current Status



Beginning January 1, 2005, the status and outcomes of bariatric surgery were examined in Germany. Data are registered in cooperation with the An-Institute of quality assurance in surgery at the Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg. The objective of this study was to examine the morbidity and mortality rates secondary to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in Germany since 2006.


Data collection occurred prospectively in an online data bank. All primary bariatric procedures performed were recorded as were all re-operations in patients that had already undergone a primary operation. Specific data compiled on the sleeve gastrectomy procedure were evaluated with a focus on operative details and complication rates.


The total study cohort contains 3,122 patients. From January 2006 to December 2007, 144 sleeve gastrectomy procedures were performed in the 17 hospitals participating in the study. The mean body mass index (BMI) of all patients was 48.8 kg/m2. The BMI of patients undergoing SG was 54.5 kg/m2. In total, 73.8% of the patients were female and 26.2% of the patients were male. There were no significant differences between patients undergoing SG. The general complication rate after SG was 14.1%, and the surgical complication rate was 9.4%. The postoperative mortality rate was 1.4%.


The complication rate during the first 2 years after SG in Germany is similar to that published in the literature. In order to improve the quality of bariatric surgery, an evaluation of data from a German multicenter trial is necessary to evaluate the position of SG in the bariatric algorithm.


Bariatric surgery Sleeve gastrectomy German multicenter trial 


  1. 1.
    Deitel M. Overweight and obesity worldwide now estimated to involve 1,7 billion people. Obes Surg 2003;13:329–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2004;292:1724–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mensink GBM, Lampert T, Bergmann E. Übergewicht und Adipositas in Deutschland 1984–2003. Bundesgesundheitsbl-Gesundheitsforsch-Gesundheitsschutz 2005;48:1348–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stroh C, Birk D, Flade-Kuthe R, et al. A nationwide survey on bariatric surgery in Germany—Results 2005–2007. Obes Surg 2009;19(1):105–12. Oct 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cohen R, Uzzan B, Bihan H, et al. Ghrelin levels and sleeve gastrectomy in super-super-obesity. Obes Surg 2005;15:1024–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gumbs AA, Gagner M, Dakin G, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Obes Surg 2007;17:962–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gagner M, Boza C. Laparoscopic duodenal switch for morbid obesity. Expert Rev Med Devices 2006;3:105–12. Review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cottam D, Qureshi FG, Mattar SG, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an initial weight-loss procedure for high-risk patients with morbid obesity. Surg Endosc 2006;20:859–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Regan JP, Inabnet WB, Gagner M, et al. Early experience with two-stage laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as an alternative in the super-super obese patient. Obes Surg 2003;13:861–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mognol P, Chosidow D, Marmuse JP. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG): review of a new bariatric procedure and initial results. Surg Technol Int 2006;15:47–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Milone L, Strong V, Gagner M. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is superior to endoscopic intragastric balloon as a first stage procedure for super-obese patients (BMI > or =50). Obes Surg 2005;15:612–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Serra C, Baltasar A, Pérez N, et al. Total gastrectomy for complications of the duodenal switch, with reversal. Obes Surg 2006;16:1082–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Serra C, Baltasar A, Andreo L, et al. Treatment of gastric leaks with coated self-expanding stents after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 2007;17:866–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clinical Issues Committee of American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Sleeve gastrectomy as a bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2007;3(6):573–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barboza E, Barboza A, Calmet F, et al. Life-saving total gastrectomy in abdominal sepsis after bariatric surgery of gastric sleeve. Rev Gastroenterol Peru 2007;27:295–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Consten EC, Gagner M, Pomp A, et al. Decreased bleeding after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with or without duodenal switch for morbid obesity using a stapled buttressed absorbable polymer membrane. Obes Surg 2004;14:1360–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Himpens J, Dapri G, Cadière GB. A prospective randomized study between laparoscopic gastric banding and laparoscopic isolated sleeve gastrectomy: results after 1 and 3 years. Obes Surg 2006;16:1450–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Agarwal S, Kini SU, Herron DM. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: a review. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2007;3:189–94. Review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Frezza EE. Laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. The future procedure of choice? Surg Today 2007;37:275–81. Review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hamoui N, Anthone GJ, Kaufman HS, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy in the high-risk patient. Obes Surg 2006;16:1445–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bernante P, Foletto M, Busetto L, et al. Feasibility of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a revision procedure for prior laparoscopic gastric banding. Obes Surg 2006;16:1327–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Baltasar A, Serra C, Pérez N, et al. Re-sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 2006;16:1535–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gagner M, Rogula T. Laparoscopic reoperative sleeve gastrectomy for poor weight loss after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Obes Surg 2003;13:649–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Almogy G, Crookes PF, Anthone GJ. Longitudinal gastrectomy as a treatment for the high-risk super-obese patient. Obes Surg 2004;14:492–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Baltasar A, Serra C, Pérez N, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a multi-purpose bariatric operation. Obes Surg 2005;15:1124–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Langer FB, Reza Hoda MA, Bohdjalian A, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy and gastric banding: effects on plasma ghrelin levels. Obes Surg 2005;15:1024–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Moon Han S, Kim WW, Oh JH. Results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at 1 year in morbidly obese Korean patients. Obes Surg 2005;15:1469–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Langer FB, Bohdjalian A, Felberbauer FX, et al. Does gastric dilatation limit the success of sleeve gastrectomy as a sole operation for morbid obesity? Obes Surg 2006;16:166–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Roa PE, Kaidar-Person O, Pinto D, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as treatment for morbid obesity: technique and short-term outcome. Obes Surg 2006;16:1323–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Silecchia G, Boru C, Pecchia A, et al. Effectiveness of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (first stage of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch) on co-morbidities in super-obese high-risk patients. Obes Surg 2006;16:1138–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Baltasar A, Bou R, Bengochea M, et al. Use of a Roux limb to correct esophagogastric junction fistulas after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 2007;17:1408–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Givon-Madhala O, Spector R, Wasserberg N, et al. Technical aspects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in 25 morbidly obese patients. Obes Surg 2007;17:722–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lalor PF, Tucker ON, Szomstein S, et al. Complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2008;4(1):33–8. Nov 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lee CM, Cirangle PT, Jossart GH. Vertical gastrectomy for morbid obesity in 216 patients: report of two-year results. Surg Endosc 2007;21:1810–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Melissas J, Koukouraki S, Askoxylakis J, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy: a restrictive procedure? Obes Surg 2007;17:57–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Neto NI, Godoy EP, Campos JM, et al. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 2007;17:825–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Weiner RA, Weiner S, Pomhoff I, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy–influence of sleeve size and resected gastric volume. Obes Surg 2007;17:1297–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Felberbauer FX, Langer F, Shakeri-Manesch S, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an isolated bariatric procedure: intermediate-term results from a large series in three austrian centers. Obes Surg 2008;18(7):814–8. Jul, Epub 2008 Apr 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine Stroh
    • 1
    • 26
  • D. Birk
    • 2
  • R. Flade- Kuthe
    • 3
  • M. Frenken
    • 4
  • B. Herbig
    • 5
  • S. Höhne
    • 6
  • H. Köhler
    • 7
  • V. Lange
    • 8
  • K. Ludwig
    • 9
  • R. Matkowitz
    • 10
  • G. Meyer
    • 11
  • P. Pick
    • 12
  • Th. Horbach
    • 13
    • 24
  • S. Krause
    • 14
  • L. Schäfer
    • 15
  • M. Schlensak
    • 16
  • E. Shang
    • 17
  • T. Sonnenberg
    • 18
  • M. Susewind
    • 19
  • H. Voigt
    • 20
  • R. Weiner
    • 21
  • S. Wolff
    • 22
  • A. M. Wolf
    • 23
  • U. Schmidt
    • 25
  • H. Lippert
    • 22
    • 26
  • Th. Manger
    • 1
    • 26
  • Bariatric Surgery Working Group
  1. 1.Department of General, Abdominal, and Pediatric SurgeryMunicipal Hospital (Teaching Hospital of the Friedrich-Schiller University at Jena, Germany)GeraGermany
  2. 2.Protestantian HospitalZweibrückenGermany
  3. 3.DRK ClementinenhausHannoverGermany
  4. 4.St. Josef-HospitalMonheimGermany
  5. 5.DiakonissenhausHamburgGermany
  6. 6.Hospital BurglengenfeldBurglengenfeldGermany
  7. 7.Hospital Herzogin-HeimBraunschweigGermany
  8. 8.Schlosspark-HospitalBerlinGermany
  9. 9.Hospital Rostock South CityRostockGermany
  10. 10.Surgical Department and Bariatric Centre FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany
  11. 11.Surgical Department Hospital Munich BogenhausenMunichGermany
  12. 12.Aesculap-West ClinicHamburgGermany
  13. 13.Department of SurgeryFriedrich Alexander UniversityErlangen-NurembergGermany
  14. 14.Hospital ToenningToenningGermany
  15. 15.Hospital WaldkirchenWaldkirchenGermany
  16. 16.Protestantian HospitalDinslakenGermany
  17. 17.Department of SurgeryUniversity HospitalMannheimGermany
  18. 18.Dominikus Hospital DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany
  19. 19.MIC Clinic BerlinBerlinGermany
  20. 20.St. Vinzenz Krankenhaus HanauHanauGermany
  21. 21.Hospital SachsenhausenFrankfurt/MainGermany
  22. 22.Department of SurgeryOtto-von-Guericke UniversityMagdeburgGermany
  23. 23.Department of SurgeryUniversity HospitalUlmGermany
  24. 24.Municipal Hospital SchwabachSchwabachGermany
  25. 25.StatConsult MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany
  26. 26.Institution of Quality assurance in operative therapy at the Otto-von-Guericke University MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations