Obesity Surgery

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 651–656 | Cite as

Breast Contouring in Postbariatric Patients: A Technique Selection Algorithm

  • Franco Carlo Migliori
  • Armando Gabrielli
  • Roberto Rizzo
  • Gian Giacomo Serra Cervetti
Technical Innovation



Breast deformities in postbariatric surgery (post-BS) patients are different and more challenging than those from non-BS patients. The histological alterations confer the highest clinical consequences to this area: highest degrees of true ptosis, deflated and flattened glands, and totally inelastic covering tissues. Plastic surgeons need an easy-to-use algorithm for technical choices.


Ptosis and volume loss are the main problems to be corrected on massive-weight-loss (M.W.L.) breasts. Both problems need specific resolutions due to their specific characteristics. Depending on the degree of ptosis and the amount of volume loss, a decisional algorithm has been developed: suitable and advisable techniques are pointed out, minimizing the risk/benefit ratio. “Pros and cons” with the use of mammary implants are emphasized.


A group of 195 postbariatric surgery patients underwent breast contouring since 2001 following the herein presented decisional algorithm. Results have been tested with Body Uneasiness Test: encouraging data pushed to continue this method and to refine it.


Referring to this strategy algorithm, choices 2 and 3 appear to be the more frequently applied and better fitted to cover the majority of M.W.L. breast defects. In the future, the birth and the rise of new mammary implant concepts and technologies could completely change this algorithm.


Breast Ptosis Round block Vertical mastoplasty Mastopexy Mammary implant Self-prosthesis Body contouring Breast contouring Massive weight loss Postbariatric plastic surgery 


  1. 1.
    Migliori FC, Robello G, Ravetti JL, et al. Histological alterations following bariatric surgery: pilot study. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1305–1307CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brink R. Management of true ptosis of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;91:657.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benelli L. A new periareolar mammaplasty: the “Round Block” technique. Aesth Plast Surg. 1990;14:93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Càrdenas-Camarena L, Ramìrez-Macìas R. Augmentation/mastopexy: how to select and perform the proper technique. Aesth Plast Surg. 2006;30:21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hammond DC, Khuthaila DK, Kim J. The interlocking gore-tex suture for control of areolar diameter and shape. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(3):804–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Longis E. Mammoplasty with an L-shaped limited scar and retropectoral dermopexy. Aesth Plast Surg. 1986;10:171–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arié G. Una nueva téchnica de mastoplastia. Rev Lat Am Cir Plast. 1957;3:22.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pecori L, Serra Cervetti GG, Marinari GM, et al. Attitudes of morbidly obese patients to weight loss and body image following bariatric surgery and body contouring. Obes Surg. 2007;17(1):68–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ribeiro L, Canzi W, Buss A, et al. Tuberous breast: a new approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101:42–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hönig JF, Frey HP, Hasse FM, et al. Autoaugmentation mastopexy with an inferior-based pedicle. Aesth Plast Surg. 2009;33:302–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Georgiade NG, Serafin D, Riefkohl R, et al. Is there a reduction mammaplasty for “all seasons”? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;63:765–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Franco Carlo Migliori
    • 1
  • Armando Gabrielli
    • 1
  • Roberto Rizzo
    • 1
  • Gian Giacomo Serra Cervetti
    • 1
  1. 1.San Martino University HospitalGenoaItaly

Personalised recommendations