Obesity Surgery

, Volume 18, Issue 10, pp 1241–1245

The Impact of Medicaid Status on Outcome After Gastric Bypass

  • J. Wesley Alexander
  • Hope R. Goodman
  • Lisa R. Martin Hawver
  • Laura James
Research Article



Socioeconomic status has been a predictor of poor outcome in many surgical diseases including morbid obesity. Potential differences in treatment and initial severity of disease have often not been well controlled in patients with bariatric surgery. This study was performed to compare the results of bariatric procedures in financially disadvantaged Medicaid patients compared to patients with Medicare and those with Commercial insurance under controlled conditions.


Prospectively collected data from 183 Medicaid, 77 Medicare and 570 Commercial/self-pay insurances were compared to determine the influence of poor economic status on outcome. All the patients received surgical care by the same surgeon at a large University-affiliated private hospital.


Medicaid patients were larger (BMI 58.4 vs. 52.8 and 50.9, respectively) and had a greater incidence of serious comorbid conditions at outset. The death rate and complications were also significantly higher postoperatively in Medicaid patients. However, when the patients were matched for age and BMI, results became similar.


Increases in postoperative mortality and morbidity appear to be associated with advanced disease because of poor access to care. When matched for age, BMI, and severity of disease, outcomes are similar. Changes in Medicaid policies could improve access and outcome.


Morbid obesity Gastric bypass Medicaid Socioeconomically disadvantaged 


  1. 1.
    Pieracci FM, Eachempati SR, Barie PS, et al. Insurance status, but not race, predicts perforation in adult patients with acute appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205:445–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bouchardy C, Verkooijen HM, Fioretta G. Social class is an important and independent prognostic factor of breast cancer mortality. Int J Cancer. 2006;119:1145–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bradley CJ, Given CW, Roberts C. Race, socioeconomic status, and breast cancer treatment and survival. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:490–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yoo HY, Thuluvath PJ. Outcome of liver transplantation in adult recipients: influence of neighborhood income, education, and insurance. Liver Transpl. 2004;10:235–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Russo MW, Sandler RS, Mandelkehr L, et al. Payer status, but not race, affects the costs of liver transplantation. Liver Transpl Surg. 1998;4:370–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim C, Diez Roux AV, Hofer TP, et al. Area socioeconomic status and mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the role of hospital volume. Am Heart J. 2007;154:385–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kapral MK, Wang H, Mamdani M, et al. Effect of socioeconomic status on treatment and mortality after stroke. Stroke. 2002;33:268–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davis ET, Lingard EA, Schemitsch EH, et al. Effects of socioeconomic status on patients’ outcome after total knee arthroplasty. Int J Qual Health Care. 2008;20:40–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hutchings A, Raine R, Brady A, et al. Socioeconomic status and outcome from intensive care in England and Wales. Med Care. 2004;42:943–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Santry HP, Lauderdale DS, Cagney KA, et al. Predictors of patient selection in bariatric surgery. Ann Surg. 2007;245:59–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carbonell AM, Lincourt AE, Matthews BD, et al. National study of the effect of patient and hospital characteristics on bariatric surgery outcomes. Am Surg. 2005;71:308–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dallal RM, Bailey L, Guenther L, et al. Comparative analysis of short-term outcomes after bariatric surgery between two disparate populations. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:110–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martin LF, Tan T-L, Holmes PA, et al. Preoperative insurance status influences postoperative complication rates for gastric bypass. Am J Surg. 1991;161:625–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Paeratakul S, Lovejoy JC, Ryan DH, et al. The relation of gender, race and socioeconomic status to obesity and obesity comorbidities in a sample of US adults. Int J Obes. 2002;26:1205–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Flum DR, Salem L, Broeckel Elrod JA, et al. Early mortality among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005;294:1903–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dallal RM, Datta T, Braitman LE. Medicare and Medicaid status predicts prolonged length of stay after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:592–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Livingston EH, Langert J. The impact of age and Medicare status on bariatric surgical outcomes. Arch Surg. 2006;141:1115–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Durkin AJ, Bloomston M, Murr MM, et al. Financial status does not predict weight loss after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 199;9:524–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Livingston EH, Ko CY. Socioeconomic characteristics of the population eligible for obesity surgery. Surgery. 2004;135:288–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Wesley Alexander
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Hope R. Goodman
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Lisa R. Martin Hawver
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Laura James
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for Surgical Weight Loss, Department of SurgeryUniversity of Cincinnati College of MedicineCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.Weight Loss ServiceThe Christ HospitalCincinnatiUSA
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Cincinnati College of MedicineCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations