Obesity Surgery

, 18:1225 | Cite as

Regional Variations in Gastric Bypass Surgery: Results from the 2005 Nationwide Inpatient Sample

Research Article



The purpose of this study is to use nationally representative data to examine regional variations in the use and outcomes of gastric bypass surgery.


Using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), we identified adults undergoing gastric bypass surgery (n = 92,910) in 2005. Following descriptive analyses, multiple logistic regression models were constructed to examine regional variations in the likelihood of laparoscopic vs. open approaches and in the likelihood of complications while controlling for patient and hospital characteristics.


After indirectly adjusting for age and sex, the gastric bypass rates per 100,000 were as follows: Northeast, 70; Midwest, 39; South, 37; and West, 61. After adjusting for both patient and hospital characteristics, the odds of receiving laparoscopic surgery for patients living in the West were 1.79 times the mean [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.67–1.92], while the odds of receiving laparoscopic surgery for patients in the Midwest were 0.66 of the mean (95% CI: 0.62–0.70) and those of the Northeast were 0.88 of the mean (95% CI: 0.83–0.94). When adjusting for both patient and hospital characteristics, the odds of one or more postoperative complications among patients living in the South were greater than the mean (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.02–1.26).


Findings from this study suggest that gastric bypass surgery is more common in the Northeast and West. There is a greater likelihood of gastric bypass being performed laparoscopically in the West; it is less likely to be performed in the Northeast and Midwest. Postoperative complications are more likely to occur in the South.


Gastric bypass Regional variations Nationwide inpatient sample 


  1. 1.
    National Institutes for Health Consensus Development Conference draft statement on gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity, 25–27 March 1991. Obes Surg. 1991;1:257–65.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Santry HP, Gillen DL, Lauderdale DS. Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005;294:1909–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nguyen NT, Root J, Zainabadi K, Sabio A, Chalifoux S, Stevens CM, et al. Accelerated growth of bariatric surgery with the introduction of minimally invasive surgery. Arch Surg. 2005;140:1198–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Flum DR, Salem L, Elrod JB, Dellinger EP, Cheadle A, Chan L. Early mortality among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005;294:1903–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zingmond DS, McGory ML, Ko CY. Hospitalization before and after gastric bypass surgery. JAMA. 2005;294:1918–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu JH, Zingmond D, Etzioni DA, O’Connell JB, Maggard MA, Livingston EH, et al. Characterizing the performance and outcomes of obesity surgery in California. Am Surg. 2003;69:823–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weller WE, Rosati C, Hannan EL. Predictors of in-hospital postoperative complications among adults undergoing bariatric procedures in New York state, 2003. Obes Surg. 2006;16:702–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nguyen-Huynh MN, Claiborne Johnston S. Regional variations in hospitalization for stroke among Asians/Pacific Islanders in the United States: a nationwide retrospective study. BMC Neurol. 2005;5:21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Proctor MC, Wainess RM, Henke PK, Upchurch GR, Wakefield TW. Venous thromboembolism: regional differences in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 1993 to 2000. Vascular. 2004;6:374–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mukherjee D, Wainess RM, Dimick JB, Cowan JA, Rajagopalan S, Chetcuti S. Variation in outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States and Predictors of Periprocedural Mortality. Cardiology. 2005;103:143–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mullins RJ, Diggs BS, Hedges JR, Newgard CD, Arthur M, Adams AL, et al. Regional differences in outcomes for hospitalized injured patients. J Trauma. 2006;60:691–700.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krumholz HM, Chen J, Rathore SS, Wang Y, Radford MJ. Regional variation in the treatment and outcomes of myocardial infarction: Investigating New England’s advantage. Am Heart J. 2003;146:242–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grant MD, Herman S. Ethnic and geographic variation in gastrostomy placement among hospitalized older patients. J Natl Med Assoc. 2004;96:1346–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Olson PR, Bronner KK, Fisher ES. United States’ trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992–2003. Spine. 2006;31:2707–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Poulouse BK, Holzman MD, Zhu Y, Smalley W, Richards WO, Kelly Wright J, et al. National variations in morbid obesity and bariatric surgery use. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    HCUP Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). 2005. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp. Accessed 17 October 2007.
  17. 17.
    Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care. 1998;36:8–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guller U, Jain N, Hervey S, Purves H, Pietrobon R. Laparoscopic vs. open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large nationwide database. Arch Surgery. 2003;138:1179–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ricciardi R, Town RJ, Kellogg TA, Ikramuddin S, Baxter NN. Outcomes after open versus laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2006;16:317–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wittgrove AC, Clark GW, Tremblay LJ. Laparoscopic gastric bypass, Roux-en-Y: preliminary report of five cases. Obes Surg. 1994;4:353–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nguyen NT, Goldman C, Rosenquist CJ, Arango A, Cole CJ, Lee Sj, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg. 2001;234:279–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Health Policy, Management, and Behavior, School of Public HealthState University of New York, University at AlbanyRensselaerUSA
  2. 2.Sections of Trauma, Critical Care, General and Laparoscopic Surgery, Department of SurgeryAlbany Medical CenterAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations