Obesity Surgery

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 680–685 | Cite as

Comparison of Volume-controlled and Pressure-controlled Ventilation during Laparoscopic Gastric Banding in Morbidly Obese Patients

  • L. E. C. De BaerdemaekerEmail author
  • C. Van der Herten
  • J. M. Gillardin
  • P. Pattyn
  • E. P. Mortier
  • L. L. Szegedi
Research Article



There are no guidelines on ventilation modes in morbidly obese patients. We investigated the effects of volume-controlled (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) on gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and cardiovascular responses in laparoscopic gastric banding procedures.


After Institutional Review Board approval, 24 adult consenting patients scheduled for laparoscopic gastric banding were studied. Anesthesia was standardized using remifentanil, propofol, rocuronium, and sevoflurane. All patients started with VCV with a tidal volume of 10 ml kg−1 ideal body weight, respiratory rate adjusted to obtain an end-tidal carbon dioxide of 35–40 mmHg, positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmH2O, an inspiratory pause of 10% and an inspiratory/expiratory ratio of 1:2. Fifteen minutes after pneumoperitoneum, the patients were randomly allocated to two groups. In Group VCV (n = 12), ventilation was with the same parameters. In Group PCV (n = 12), the airway pressure was set to provide a tidal volume of 10 ml kg−1 ideal body weight without exceeding 35 cm H2O. Respiratory rate was adjusted to keep an end-tidal carbon dioxide of 35–40 mmHg. Arterial blood samples were drawn after surgical positioning and 15 min after allocation. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis.


With constant minute ventilation, VCV generates equal airway pressures and cardiovascular effects with a lower PaCO2 as compared to PCV (42.5 (5.2) mmHg versus 48.9 (4.3) mmHg, p < 0.01 ANOVA). Arterial oxygenation remained unchanged.


VCV and PCV appear to be an equally suited ventilatory technique for laparoscopic procedures in morbidly obese patients. Carbon dioxide elimination is more efficient when using VCV.


Ventilation Mechanics Surgery Laparoscopy Partial pressure oxygen Carbon dioxide Elimination Cardiovascular system Effects 



This study was solely funded by institutional and departmental resources.


  1. 1.
    Clegg A, Colquitt J, Sidhu M, et al. Clinical and cost effectiveness of surgery for morbid obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27:1167–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mason EE. Surgery in the obese. Lancet. 2003;361:2001–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pelosi P, Croci M, Ravagnan I, et al. Total respiratory system, lung, and chest wall mechanics in sedated-paralyzed postoperative morbidly obese patients. Chest. 1996;109:144–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hedenstierna G, Santesson J. Breathing mechanics, dead space and gas exchange in the extremely obese, breathing spontaneously and during anaesthesia with intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1976;20:248–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pelosi P, Ravagnan I, Giurati G, et al. Positive end-expiratory pressure improves respiratory function in obese but not in normal subjects during anesthesia and paralysis. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:1221–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bardoczky GI, Yernault JC, Houben JJ, et al. Large tidal volume ventilation does not improve oxygenation in morbidly obese patients during anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1995;81:385–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sprung J, Whalley DG, Falcone T, et al. The effects of tidal volume and respiratory rate on oxygenation and respiratory mechanics during laparoscopy in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:268–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jones K. Can the morbidly obese have the same “standard of care”? Anesth Analg. 2003;97:603; author reply 603–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Minto CF, Schnider TW, Shafer SL. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. II. Model application. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:24–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davis K Jr, Branson RD, Campbell RS, et al. Comparison of volume control and pressure control ventilation: is flow waveform the difference? J Trauma. 1996;41:808–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Campbell RS, Davis BR. Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation: does it matter? Respir Care. 2002;47:416–24; discussion 424–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cole AG, Weller SF, Sykes MK. Inverse ratio ventilation compared with PEEP in adult respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med. 1984;10:227–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tharratt RS, Allen RP, Albertson TE. Pressure controlled inverse ratio ventilation in severe adult respiratory failure. Chest. 1988;94:755–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gurevitch MJ, Van Dyke J, Young ES, et al. Improved oxygenation and lower peak airway pressure in severe adult respiratory distress syndrome. Treatment with inverse ratio ventilation. Chest. 1986;89:211–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lessard MR, Guerot E, Lorino H, et al. Effects of pressure-controlled with different I:E ratios versus volume-controlled ventilation on respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, and hemodynamics in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology. 1994;80:983–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mancebo J, Vallverdu I, Bak E, et al. Volume-controlled ventilation and pressure-controlled inverse ratio ventilation: a comparison of their effects in ARDS patients. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 1994;49:201–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mang H, Kacmarek RM, Ritz R, et al. Cardiorespiratory effects of volume- and pressure-controlled ventilation at various I/E ratios in an acute lung injury model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;151:731–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Munoz J, Guerrero JE, Escalante JL, et al. Pressure-controlled ventilation versus controlled mechanical ventilation with decelerating inspiratory flow. Crit Care Med. 1993;21:1143–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nyarwaya JB, Mazoit JX, Samii K. Are pulse oximetry and end-tidal carbon dioxide tension monitoring reliable during laparoscopic surgery? Anaesthesia. 1994;49:775–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yamanaka MK, Sue DY. Comparison of arterial-end-tidal PCO2 difference and dead space/tidal volume ratio in respiratory failure. Chest. 1987;92:832–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fleischmann E, Herbst F, Kugener A, et al. Mild hypercapnia increases subcutaneous and colonic oxygen tension in patients given 80% inspired oxygen during abdominal surgery. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:944–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hager H, Reddy D, Mandadi G, et al. Hypercapnia improves tissue oxygenation in morbidly obese surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:677–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. E. C. De Baerdemaeker
    • 1
    Email author
  • C. Van der Herten
    • 1
  • J. M. Gillardin
    • 2
  • P. Pattyn
    • 2
  • E. P. Mortier
    • 1
  • L. L. Szegedi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiaGhent University HospitalGentBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Abdominal SurgeryGhent University HospitalGentBelgium

Personalised recommendations