Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 1987–1994 | Cite as

Application of a vibration damping technique in characterizing mechanical properties of chicken meat batters modified with amaranth

  • Lubomír Lapčík
  • Martin Vašina
  • Barbora Lapčíková
  • Mária Plšková
  • Robert Gál
  • Michaela Brychtová
Original Paper

Abstract

Thermal analysis, texture profile analysis, water holding capacity and dynamic mechanical testing methods were used for study of the physico-chemical and mechanical properties of the model chicken meat batters modified by the addition of amaranth flour. It was found that the addition of the amaranth effectively modified and improved their textural and nutritional properties. Further, the addition of calcium dihydrogen phosphate to the complex meat batter was shown to enhance formation of the creation of the three dimensional gel networks during protein denaturation, which resulted in increased tenderness of the product, as was demonstrated by decreased hardness, toughness and gumminess of the chicken batters with the increase of amaranth concentration. These findings were supported by dynamic mechanical vibration testing experiments and by increased water holding capacity. After amaranth flour addition, the observed frequency dependence of the measured damping transfer function of the tested samples showed typical viscoelastic behaviour rather than pure elastic behaviour. The first resonance peak frequency shifted from 200 Hz for unmodified chicken batter to 120 Hz for batter with 1 wt% amaranth concentration and 0.45 wt% calcium dihydrogen phosphate. Formation of a hydrocolloid gel structure was confirmed by thermal analysis experiments, which showed decreased DTA protein denaturation temperature peak position from 101.3 °C for the unmodified batter to 90.6 °C for batter with 2 wt% amaranth. Interestingly, after addition of a Ca2+ crosslinking agent into the matrix, thermal resistance of the gel phase increased, which was reflected by the increased latter denaturation peak position from 93.7 °C (for 1.5 wt% amaranth concentration chicken meat batters without calcium dihydrogen phosphate) to 108.8 °C for 0.45 wt% crosslinking agent calcium dihydrogen phosphate and 1.5 wt% amaranth concentration chicken meat batters.

Keywords

Chicken meat Batters Gel network Amaranth flour Dynamic-mechanical testing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the Tomas Bata University in Zlin Internal Grant Agency (projects IGA/FT/2016/003 and IGA/FT/2017/004) and the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (grant no. LO1305) are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Avanza, M. Puppo, M. Anon, Structural characterization of amaranth protein gels. J. Food Sci. 70(3), E223–E229 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y. Xu, A. Cartier, D. Kibet, K. Jordan, I. Hakala, S. Davis, E. Sismour, M. Kering, L. Rutto, Physical and nutritional properties of edamame seeds as influenced by stage of development. J. Food Measur. Charact. 10(2), 193–200 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Cofrades, A. Serrano, J. Ayo, J. Carballo, F. Jimenez-Colmenero, Characteristics of meat batters with added native and preheated defatted walnut. Food Chem. 107(4), 1506–1514 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.C. Bourne, Effect of water activity on texture profile parameters of apple flesh. J. Texture Stud. 17(3), 331–340 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Li, S. Nie, The functional and nutritional aspects of hydrocolloids in foods. Food Hydrocoll. 53, 46–61 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.M. Mariscal Moreno, J.D.C. Figueroa, D. Santiago-Ramos, G. Arambula Villa, S. Jimenez Sandoval, P. Rayas-Duarte, J. Juan Veles-Medina, H.E. Martinez Flores, The effect of different nixtamalisation processes on some physicochemical properties, nutritional composition and glycemic index. J. Cereal Sci. 65, 140–146 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Shevkani, N. Singh, J.C. Rana, A. Kaur, Relationship between physicochemical and functional properties of amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) protein isolates. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 49(2), 541–550 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Ostoja, M. Cierach, H. Konopko, K. Majewska, Effect of addition of grit made of crude and expanded amaranth seeds on the quality of canned meat. Nahrung-Food 46(4), 270–275 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Z. Gálová, E. Pálenčárová, M. Chňapek, Ž. Balažová, Comparison of 2-de proteome maps of wheat, rye and amaranth. JMBFS 4, 7–10 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Phongpa-Ngan, S.E. Aggrey, J.H. Mulligan, L. Wicker, Raman spectroscopy to assess water holding capacity in muscle from fast and slow growing broilers. Lwt-Food Sci. Technol. 57(2), 696–700 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. Jimenez-Colmenero, S. Cofrades, J. Carballo, P. Fernandez, F. Fernandez-Martin, Heating of chicken and pork meat batters under pressure conditions: Protein interactions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46(11), 4706–4711 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E.G. Aguilar, E.G. Peiretti, M.A. Unates, E.J. Marchevsky, N.L. Escudero, J. Manuel Camina, Amaranth seed varieties. A chemometric approach. J. Food Measur. Charact. 7(4), 199–206 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Tapia-Blacido, A.N. Mauri, F.C. Menegalli, P.J.A. Sobral, M.C. Anon, Contribution of the starch, protein, and lipid fractions to the physical, thermal, and structural properties of amaranth (Amaranthus caudatus) flour films. J. Food Sci. 72(5), E293–E300 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M.J. Hidalgo, S.C. Sgroppo, J.M. Camina, E.J. Marchevsky, R.G. Pellerano, Trace element concentrations in commercial gluten-free amaranth bars. J. Food Measur. Charact. 9(3), 426–434 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    N.H.B.S. Long, R. Gál, F. Bunka, Use of phosphates in meat products. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10(86), 19874–19882 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Petracci, M. Bianchi, S. Mudalal, C. Cavani, Functional ingredients for poultry meat products. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 33(1), 27–39 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Plšková, R. Gál, F. Buňka, Possible replacement of phosphates by amaranth flour in minced meat batters production. XVI. Conference of Young Scientific Researchers with International Attendance, Veterinary and Pharmaceutical University, Brno pp. 68–71 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Barbut, Effects of caseinate, whey and milk powders on the texture and microstructure of emulsified chicken meat batters. Lwt-Food Sci. Technol. 39(6), 660–664 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    P. Tamilmani, M.C. Pandey, Thermal analysis of meat and meat products. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 123(3), 1899–1917 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    J.M. Kijowski, M.G. Mast, Thermal —properties of proteins in chicken broiler tissues. J. Food Sci. 53(2), 363–366 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    P. Trespalacios, R. Pla, Simultaneous application of transglutaminase and high pressure to improve functional properties of chicken meat gels. Food Chem. 100(1), 264–272 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    P. Trespalacios, R. Pla, Synergistic action of transglutaminase and high pressure on chicken meat and egg gels in absence of phosphates. Food Chem. 104(4),1718–1727 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    L. Lapcik, M. Vasina, B. Lapcikova, T. Valenta, Study of bread staling by means of vibro-acoustic, tensile and thermal analysis techniques. J. Food Eng. 178, 31–38 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    S. Iwatani, H. Akimoto, N. Sakurai, Acoustic vibration method for food texture evaluation using an accelerometer sensor. J. Food Eng. 115(1), 26–32 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    S. Trabelsi, Variation of the dielectric properties of chicken meat with frequency and temperature. J Food Measur. Charact. 9(3), 299–304 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    G. Villamonte, H. Simonin, F. Duranton, R. Cheret, M. de Lamballerie, Functionality of pork meat proteins: Impact of sodium chloride and phosphates under high-pressure processing. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 18, 15–23 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    W.L. Kerr, R. Li, R.T. Toledo, Dynamic mechanical analysis of marinated chicken breast meat. J. Texture Stud. 31(4), 421–436 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    S.P. Beeby, M.J. Tudor, N.M. White, Energy harvesting vibration sources for microsystems applications. Meas. Sci. Technol. 17(12), R175–R195 (2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    D. Santiago-Ramos, J. de Dios Figueroa-Cardenas, J. Juan Veles-Medina, R. Reynoso-Camacho, M. Ramos-Gomez, M. Gaytan-Martinez, E. Morales-Sanchez, Effects of annealing and concentration of calcium salts on thermal and rheological properties of maize starch during an ecological nixtamalization process. Cereal Chem. 92(5), 475–480 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lubomír Lapčík
    • 1
    • 2
  • Martin Vašina
    • 3
    • 4
  • Barbora Lapčíková
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mária Plšková
    • 1
  • Robert Gál
    • 1
  • Michaela Brychtová
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Technology, Institute of Foodstuff TechnologyTomas Bata University in ZlinZlinCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and MaterialsPalacky University in OlomoucOlomoucCzech Republic
  3. 3.Faculty of Technology, Institute of Physics and Materials EngineeringTomas Bata University in ZlinZlinCzech Republic
  4. 4.Department of Hydromechanics and Hydraulic Equipment, Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringVŠB-Technical University of OstravaOstrava-PorubaCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations