Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 269–280 | Cite as

Optimization of osmo-vacuum drying of pear (Pyrus communis L.) using response surface methodology

  • M. AmiripourEmail author
  • M. B. Habibi-NajafiEmail author
  • M. Mohebbi
  • B. Emadi
Original Paper


In the two-stage optimization of the osmotic dehydration and vacuum drying of the pear slices using response surface methodology, using face-centred central composite design (FCC), it was shown that the independent variables for osmotic dehydration were temperature (25–55 °C), solution concentration (50–70 % w/w), and immersion time (60–120 min) and for vacuum drying were vacuum pressure (10–30 kPa), drying temperature (50–70 °C) and drying time (180–300 min). Statistical analysis of results showed that the linear terms of all process variables in both stages have a significant effect on the responses. The second-order polynomial models for all response variables were found to be statistically significant with high values of R2 (>0.8). The optimum osmotic dehydration conditions for maximum water loss, minimum solute gain and maximum weight reduction were: 55 °C temperature, 50 % sucrose solution concentration, and 115 min immersion time. Dehydrated pear slices at optimized osmotic dehydration conditions were then subjected to vacuum drying. Optimum drying conditions of 10 kPa vacuum pressure, 55 °C temperature and 250 min drying time were established for vacuum drying of pear. At this optimum point, moisture content (MC), rehydration ratio and shrinkage were found to be 23.26 % (w.b.), 1.46 and 67.45 %, respectively. Separate validation experiment was conducted at the derived optimum conditions to verify the predictions and adequacy of the models. Two-stage optimization led to obtaining the best condition for production of dried quince slices with lowest MC, and shrinkage.


Osmotic dehydration Pear Response surface methodology Two-stage drying Vacuum drying 


  1. 1.
    K.J. Park, A. Bin, F. Pedro Reis Brod, J. Food Eng. (2003). doi: 10.1016/S0260-8774(02)00152-8 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    FAO. Statistical Database. (2014). Accessed 19 Nov 2014
  3. 3.
    J. Bondaruk, M. Markowski, W. Blaszczak, J. Food Eng. (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.10.028 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Mitra, V. Meda, Dry. Technol. (2009). doi: 10.1080/07373930903221101 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Qing-guo, Z. Min, A. Mujumdar, D. Wei-hua, S. Jin-cai, Dry. Technol. (2006). doi: 10.1080/07373930600776217 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.H. Lee, H.J. Kim, LWT-Food Sci. Technol. (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2008.05.017 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Jaya, H. Das, Dry. Technol. (2003). doi: 10.1081/DRT-120023177 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Wu, T. Orikasa, Y. Ogawa, A. Tagawa, J. Food Eng. (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.03.030 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Fathi, M. Mohebbi, S.M.A. Razavi, Food Bioprocess Technol. (2011). doi: 10.1007/s11947-009-0222-y Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Manivannan, M. Rajasimman, Int. J. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2(1), 374 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Singh, P.S. Panesar, V. Nanda, J. Food Process Eng (2008). doi: 10.1111/j.1745-4530.2007.00173.x Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    O. Corzo, E.R. Gomez, J. Food Eng. (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2003.09.035 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    F.A.N. Fernandes, S. Rodrigues, O.C.P. Gaspareto, E.L. Oliveira, J. Food Eng. (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.05.058 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M.S. Alam, S. Amarjit, B. Sawhney, J. Food Sci. Technol. (2010). doi: 10.1007/s13197-010-0014-4 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Koocheki, E. Azarpazhooh, Int. J. Food Prop. (2009). doi: 10.1080/10942910802256172 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M.B. Uddin, P. Ainsworth, S. Ibanoglu, J. Food Eng. (2004). doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.02.007 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Petchi, R. Manivasagan, Int. J. Food Eng. (2009). doi: 10.2202/1556-3758.1584 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    B.S. Yadav, R.B. Yadav, M. Jatain, J. Food Sci. Technol. (2011). doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0298-z Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    P.S. Madamba, Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und-Technologie (2002). doi: 10.1016/S0023-6438(02)90914-X Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Z. Erbay, F. Icier, Dry. Technol. (2009). doi: 10.1080/07373930802683021 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Y. Deng, Y. Zhao, LWT-Food Sci. Technol. (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2007.10.018 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    AOAC, Official Method of Analysis, (Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, DC, 1995)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. Mohebbi, M.R. Akbarzadeh-T, F. Shahidi, S.M. Zabihi, Int. J. Food Eng. (2011). doi: 10.2202/1556-3758.1670 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    M. Noshad, M. Mohebbi, F. Shahidi, S.A. Mortazavi, Food Bioprocess Technol. (2011). doi: 10.1007/s11947-011-0577-8 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. Fathi, M. Mohebbi, S.M.A. Razavi, Food Bioprocess Technol. (2011). doi: 10.1007/s11947-010-0452-z Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    B. Singh, P.S. Panesar, V. Nanda, J.F. Kennedy, Food Chem. (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.04.075 Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. Chauhan, A. Srivastava, Dry. Technol. (2009). doi: 10.1080/07373930902828120 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    I. Eren, F. Kaymak-Ertekin, J. Food Eng. (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.01.069 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. Mundada, B. Singh, S. Maske, Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. (2010). doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02328.x Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Q. Hu, M. Zhang, A.S. Mujumdar, G. Xiao, S. Jin-cai, J. Food Eng. (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.08.025 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Z. Erbay, F. Icier, J. Food Eng. (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.10.004 Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    S. Giri, S. Prasad, Dry. Technol. (2007). doi: 10.1080/07373930701370407 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of AgricultureFerdowsi University of MashhadMashhadIran
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural Machinery, Faculty of AgricultureFerdowsi University of MashhadMashhadIran

Personalised recommendations