Macroevolution of Toothed Whales Exceptional Relative Brain Size
Toothed whales (Odontoceti, Cetacea) are well-known for their ability to produce complex vocalizations, to use tools, to possess self-recognition, and for their extreme behavioural plasticity. The toothed whale intelligence is said to compete with that of primates, so does their extremely large brain to body size ratio. Common explanations for the acquisition of such large brains over the evolutionary time (encephalization) in toothed whales range from their demanding, complex social lives, to their feeding habits, to echolocation. Yet, several studies found no macroevolutionary trend in Odontoceti encephalization, which casts doubts on its selective advantage. We applied a recently developed phylogenetic comparative method to study macroevolutionary trends in relative brain size (RBS) and brain size evolutionary rates in cetaceans, comparing toothed whales to the other cetaceans and contrasting groups of species as ascribed to different feeding categories. We found that cetaceans as a whole followed a trend for increased encephalization over time, starting from small-brained archaeocete ancestors. Toothed whales do not show this same trend in RBS but have possessed larger RBS than any other cetacean ever since the beginning of their existence. The rate of RBS evolution in Odontoceti is significantly slower than in other Cetacea and slower than the rate of Odontoceti body size evolution. These results suggest that toothed whales’ history is characterized by high and conservative relative encephalization. Feeding lifestyle does not explain these patterns, while the appearance of echolocation within stem group Odontoceti remains a viable candidate for them.
KeywordsEncephalization Relative brain size Cetaceans Odontoceti Mysticeti
We are grateful to Francesco Carotenuto for critical comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. Phil Gingerich provided some crucial data on extinct cetaceans’ brain mass estimates.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Aiello, L. C., & Wells, J. C. (2002). Energetics and the evolution of the genus Homo. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31(1), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Berta, A., Lanzetti, A., Ekdale, E. G., & Deméré, T. A. (2016). From teeth to baleen and raptorial to bulk filter feeding in mysticete cetaceans: The role of paleontological, genetic, and geochemical data in feeding evolution and ecology. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 56(6), 1271–1284. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icw128.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bianucci, G., & Landini, W. (2002). A new short-rostrum odontocete (Mammalia: Cetacea) from the Middle Miocene of the eastern Netherlands. Beaufortia, 52(11), 187–196.Google Scholar
- Castiglione, S., Serio, C., Mondanaro, A., Di Febbraro, M., Profico, A., Girardi, G., et al. (2019). Simultaneous detection of macroevolutionary patterns in phenotypic means and rate of change with and within phylogenetic trees including extinct species. PLoS ONE, 14(1), e0210101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Clapham, P. J. (1996). The social and reproductive biology of Humpback Whales: An ecological perspective. Mammal Review, 26(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.1996.tb00145.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Clementz, M. T., Goswami, A., Gingerich, P. D., & Koch, P. L. (2006). Isotopic records from early whales and sea cows: Contrasting patterns of ecological transition. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 26(2), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1671/0272-4634(2006)26[355:IRFEWA]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Connor, R. C. (2007). Dolphin social intelligence: Complex alliance relationships in bottlenose dolphins and a consideration of selective environments for extreme brain size evolution in mammals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 587–602. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eisenberg, J. F., & Wilson, D. E. (1978). Relative brain size and feeding strategies in the chiroptera. Evolution, 32(4), 740–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1978.tb04627.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Herculano-Houzel, S., Catania, K., Manger, P. R., & Kaas, J. H. (2015). Mammalian brains are made of these: A dataset of the numbers and densities of neuronal and nonneuronal cells in the brain of glires, primates, scandentia, eulipotyphlans, afrotherians and artiodactyls, and their relationship with body mass. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 86(3–4), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1159/000437413.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Herman, L. M., Matus, D. S., Herman, E. Y. K., Ivancic, M., & Pack, A. A. (2001). The bottlenosed dolphin’s (Tursiops truncatus) understanding of gestures as symbolic representations of its body parts. Animal Learning and Behavior, 29(3), 250–264. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ichishima, H., Barnes, L. G., Fordyce, R. E., Kimura, M., & Bohaska, D. J. (1994). A review of kentriodontine dolphins (Cetacea, Delphinoidea, Kentriodontidae): Systematics and biogeography. The Island Arc, 3(4), 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1738.1994.tb00127.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lenth, R. (2018). Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version, 1(1).Google Scholar
- Mace, G. M., Harvey, P. H., & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2009). Brain size and ecology in small mammals. Journal of Zoology, 193(3), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1981.tb03449.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Manger, P. R. (2013). Questioning the interpretations of behavioral observations of cetaceans: Is there really support for a special intellectual status for this mammalian order? Neuroscience, 250, 664–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.07.041.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Navarrete, A. F., Blezer, E. L., Pagnotta, M., de Viet, E. S., Todorov, O. S., Lindenfors, P., et al. (2018). Primate brain anatomy: New volumetric MRI measurements for neuroanatomical studies. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 91(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1159/000488136.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Raia, P., Castiglione, S., Serio, C., Mondanaro, A., Melchionna, M., Di Febbraro, M., et al. (2019). RRphylo: Phylogenetic ridge regression methods for comparative studies. R package version 2.1.0. https://github.com/pasraia/RRphylo.
- Ridgway, S. H., Carlin, K. P., Van Alstyne, K. R., Hanson, A. C., & Tarpley, R. J. (2016). Comparison of dolphins’ body and brain measurements with four other groups of cetaceans reveals great diversity. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 88(3–4), 235–257. https://doi.org/10.1159/000454797.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Uhen, M. D. (2004). Form, function, and anatomy of Dorudon atrox (Mammalia, Cetacea): An Archaeocete from the Middle to Late Eocene of Egypt. Papers on Paleontology, 34, 1–222.Google Scholar
- Weisbecker, V., Blomberg, S., Goldizen, A. W., Brown, M., & Fisher, D. (2015). The evolution of relative brain size in marsupials is energetically constrained but not driven by behavioral complexity. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 85(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1159/000377666.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wright, A., Scadeng, M., Stec, D., Dubowitz, R., Ridgway, S., & Leger, J. S. (2017). Neuroanatomy of the killer whale (Orcinus orca): A magnetic resonance imaging investigation of structure with insights on function and evolution. Brain Structure and Function, 222(1), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-016-1225-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar