Experimental Removal of Sexual Selection Reveals Adaptations to Polyandry in Both Sexes
- 467 Downloads
Polyandrous mating is extremely common, yet for many species the evolutionary significance is not fully resolved. In order to understand the evolution of mating systems, it is crucial that we investigate the adaptive consequences across many facets of reproduction. We performed experimental evolution with the naturally polygamous flour beetle Tribolium castaneum subjected to either polyandry or enforced monogamy, creating contrasting selection regimes associated with the presence or absence of sexual selection. After 36 generations, we investigated male and female adaptations by mating beetles with an unselected tester strain to exclude potential effects of male–female coevolution. Reproductive success of focal monogamous and polyandrous beetles from each sex was assessed in separate single male and multiple male experiments emulating the different selection backgrounds. Males and females from the polyandrous regime had more offspring in the experiments with multiple males present than monogamous counterparts. However, in single male experiments, neither females nor males differed between selection regimes. Subsequent mating trials with multiple males suggested that adaptations to polyandry in both sexes provide benefits when choice and competition were allowed to take place. Polyandrous females delayed the first copulation when given a choice of males and polyandrous males were quicker to achieve copulation when facing competition. In conclusion, we show that the expected benefits of evolutionary adaptation to polyandry in T. castaneum depended on the availability of multiple mates. This context-dependent effect, which concerned both sexes, highlights the importance of realistic competition and choice experiments.
KeywordsExperimental evolution Mating system Monogamy Multiple mating Reproductive success Tribolium castaneum
We thank the Swiss National Science Foundation (Ambizione Grants PZ00P3_121777 and PZ00P3-137514 and standard research Grant 31003A_125144/1 to OYM), ETH Zurich, NERC and the University of East Anglia for support. We further thank Helen Alexander and the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. Finally, we are very grateful to Richard Beeman (USDA) for providing the beetle stock originally used to generate the selection lines assessed here.
- Arnqvist, G., & Rowe, L. (2005). Sexual conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Hangartner, S. B., Sbilordo, S. H., Michalczyk, Ł., Gage, M. J. G., & Martin, O. Y. (in press). Are there genetic trade-offs between immune and reproductive investments in Tribolium castaneum? Infection, Genetics and Evolution.Google Scholar
- Hoffmann, A. A., & Parsons, P. A. (1991). Evolutionary genetics and environmental stress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hosken, D. J., & Stockley, P. (2003). Benefits of polyandry: A life history perspective. Evolutionary Biology, 33, 173–194.Google Scholar
- Jenni, D. A. (1974). Evolution of polyandry in birds. American Zoologist, 14, 129–144.Google Scholar
- Michalczyk, Ł., Martin, O. Y., Millard, A. L., Emerson, B. C., & Gage, M. J. G. (2010). Inbreeding depresses sperm competitiveness, but not fertilization or mating success in male Tribolium castaneum. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 277, 3483–3491.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Parker, G. A. (1979). Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In M. S. Blum & N. A. Blum (Eds.), Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects (pp. 123–166). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Sbilordo, S. H., Grazer, V. M., Demont, M., & Martin, O. Y. (2011). Impacts of starvation on male reproductive success in Tribolium castaneum. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 13, 347–359.Google Scholar
- Thornhill, R., & Alcock, J. (1983). The evolution of insect mating systems. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar