Evolutionary Biology

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 336–338 | Cite as

The Origin(s) of Modern Amphibians: A Commentary

  • David Marjanović
  • Michel LaurinEmail author

Anderson (2008) recently reviewed the controversial topic of extant amphibian origins, on which three (groups of) hypotheses exist at the moment. Anderson favors the “polyphyly hypothesis” (PH), which considers the extant amphibians to be polyphyletic with respect to many Paleozoic limbed vertebrates and was most recently supported by the analysis of Anderson et al. (2008). Another is the “temnospondyl hypothesis” (TH—lissamphibians nested within temnospondyls), most recently supported by Ruta and Coates (2007). We prefer the “lepospondyl hypothesis” (LH—lissamphibians nested within “lepospondyls”; most recently supported by Vallin and Laurin 2004 and Marjanović and Laurin 2008a). We would like to clarify important points that were not discussed in Anderson’s review, or for which crucial arguments were left out.

Anderson (2008) argues that most molecular dates favor the PH because they suggest a Devonian or Early Carboniferous diversification of Lissamphibia. This is inaccurate, since...


Phylogenetic Signal Loss Character Stratigraphic Range Multistate Character Laurin 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



J.-C. Rage, D. Wake, and two anonymous referees commented on previous drafts of this paper; we are especially grateful to D. Wake for several constructive suggestions.

Supplementary material


  1. Anderson, J. S. (2002). Revision of the aïstopod genus Phlegethontia (Tetrapoda: Lepospondyli). Journal of Paleontology, 76, 1029–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. S. (2008). Focal review: The origin(s) of modern amphibians. Evolutionary Biology, 35, 231–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. S., Reisz, R. R., Scott, D., Fröbisch, N. B., & Sumida, S. S. (2008). A stem batrachian from the Early Permian of Texas and the origin of frogs and salamanders. Nature, 453, 515–518.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bossy, K. A., & Milner, A. C. (1998). Order Nectridea Miall 1875. Carroll, R. L., Bossy, K. A., Milner, A. C., Andrews, S. M., & Wellstead, C. F. In P. Wellnhofer (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Paleoherpetology, Part 1: Lepospondyli (pp. 73–131). Munich: Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.Google Scholar
  5. Carroll, R. L. (1998). Cranial anatomy of ophiderpetontid aïstopods: Palaeozoic limbless amphibians. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 122, 143–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Germain D. (2008a). Anatomie des Lépospondyles et origine des Lissamphibiens (PhD thesis, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris) 351 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Germain, D. (2008b). A new phlegethontiid specimen (Lepospondyli, Aistopoda) from the Late Carboniferous of Montceau-les-Mines (Saône-et-Loire, France). Geodiversitas, 30, 669–680.Google Scholar
  8. Germain, D., & Laurin, M. (2009). Evolution of ossification sequences in salamanders and urodele origins assessed through event-pairing and new methods. Evolution and Development, 11, 170–190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huelsenbeck, J. P. (1991). Tree-length distribution skewness: An indicator of phylogenetic information. Systematic Zoology, 40, 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hugall, A. F., Foster, R., & Lee, M. S. Y. (2007). Calibration choice, rate smoothing, and the pattern of tetrapod diversification according to the long nuclear gene RAG-1. Systematic Biology, 56, 543–563.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johanson, Z., Joss, J., Boisvert, C. A., Ericsson, R., Sutija, M., & Ahlberg, P. E. (2007). Fish fingers: Digit homologues in sarcopterygian fish fins. Journal of Experimental Zoology. Part B. Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 308, 757–768.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marjanović, D., & Laurin, M. (2007). Fossils, molecules, divergence times, and the origin of lissamphibians. Systematic Biology, 56, 369–388.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marjanović, D., & Laurin, M. (2008a). A reevaluation of the evidence supporting an unorthodox hypothesis on the origin of extant amphibians. Contributions to Zoology, 77, 149–199.Google Scholar
  14. Marjanović, D., & Laurin, M. (2008b). Assessing confidence intervals for stratigraphic ranges of higher taxa: The case of Lissamphibia. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 53, 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McGowan, G. J. (2002). Albanerpetontid amphibians from the Lower Cretaceous of Spain and Italy: A description and reconsideration of their systematics. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 135, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Milner, A. C. (1980). A review of the Nectridea (Amphibia). In A. L. Panchen (Ed.), The terrestrial environment and the origin of land vertebrates (pp. 377–405). London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Pawley K. (2006). The postcranial skeleton of temnospondyls (Tetrapoda: Temnospondyli) (PhD thesis, La Trobe University, Melbourne), 442 pp. Retrieved from
  18. Ruta, M., & Coates, M. I. (2007). Dates, nodes and character conflict: Addressing the lissamphibian origin problem. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 5, 69–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ruta, M., Coates, M. I., & Quicke, D. L. J. (2003). Early tetrapod relationships revisited. Biological Reviews, 78, 251–345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schoch, R. R. (1992). Comparative ontogeny of Early Permian branchiosaurid amphibians from southwestern Germany. Palaeontographica. Abteilung A, 222, 43–83.Google Scholar
  21. Schoch, R. R., & Milner, A. R. (2004). Structure and implications of theories on the origin of lissamphibians. In G. Arratia, M. V. H. Wilson, & R. Cloutier (Eds.), Recent advances in the origin and early radiations of vertebrates (pp. 345–377). Munich: Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.Google Scholar
  22. Vallin, G., & Laurin, M. (2004). Cranial morphology and affinities of Microbrachis, and a reappraisal of the phylogeny and lifestyle of the first amphibians. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 24, 56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Département Histoire de la TerreUMR CNRS 7207 Centre de Recherches sur la Paléobiodiversité et les Paléoenvironnements, Muséum National d’Histoire NaturelleParis cedex 05France

Personalised recommendations