Evolutionary Biology

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 317–323 | Cite as

Hennigian Phylogenetic Systematics and the ‘Groundplan’ vs. ‘Post-Groundplan’ Approaches: A Reply to Kukalová-Peck

  • Olivier Béthoux
  • Niels P. Kristensen
  • Michael S. Engel
Commentary

Abstract

The recent contribution by Jarmila Kukalová-Peck on Hennigian phylogenetics and hexapod limb evolution is critically evaluated.

Keywords

Systematic methods Groundplan method Insect limbs Insecta phylogeny Insect wings Morphology Paleontology 

References

  1. Béthoux, O. (2007). Cladotypic taxonomy revisited. Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny, 65, 127–133.Google Scholar
  2. Béthoux, O., & Briggs, D. E. G. (2008). How Gerarus lost its head: Stem-group Orthoptera and Paraneoptera revisited. Systematic Entomology, 33, 529–547. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3113.2008.00419.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Béthoux, O., Nel, A., & Lapeyrie, J. (2004). The extinct order Caloneurodea (Insecta, Pterygota, Panorthoptera): Wing venation, systematics, and phylogenetic relationships. Annales Zoologici, 54, 289–318.Google Scholar
  4. Beutel, R. G., & Gorb, S. (2006). A revised interpretation of the evolution of attachment structures in Hexapoda with special emphasis on Mantophasmatodea. Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny, 64, 3–25.Google Scholar
  5. Bryant, H. N. (2001). Character polarity and the rooting of cladograms. In G. Wagner (Ed.), The character concept in evolutionary biology (pp. 319–337). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carpenter, F. M. (1938). Two Carboniferous insects from the vicinity of Mazon Creek, Illinois. American Journal of Science, 36(5), 445–452.Google Scholar
  7. Carpenter, F. M. (1943). The Lower Permian insects of Kansas. Part 9. The orders Neuroptera, Raphidiodea, Caloneurodea and Prothortoptera (Probnisidae), with additional Protodonata and Megasecoptera. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 75, 55–84.Google Scholar
  8. Carpenter, F. M. (1987). Review of the extinct family Syntonopteridae (order uncertain). Psyche, 94, 373–388. doi:10.1155/1987/25879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Denis, J.-R., Bitsch, J. (1973). Structure céphalique dans les ordres des insectes. In P. P. Grassé (Ed.), Traité de Zoologie (Vol. 8, part 1, pp. 101–593). Paris: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
  10. Domes, K., Norton, R. A., Maraun, M., & Scheu, S. (2007). Reevolution of sexuality breaks Dollo’s law. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 7139–7144. doi:10.1073/pnas.0700034104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hennig, W. (1966). Phylogenetic systematics (p. 263). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hennig, W. (1969). Die Stammesgeschichte der Insekten (p. 436). Frankfurt am Main: Kramer.Google Scholar
  13. Hennig, W. (1981). Insect phylogeny (xxii + 514 pp). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Kristensen, N. P. (1981). Phylogeny of insect orders. Annual Review of Entomology, 26, 135–157. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.26.010181.001031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kristensen, N. P. (1991). Phylogeny of the extant hexapods. In CSIRO (Ed.), The insects of Australia, a textbook for students and researchers (2nd ed., pp. 125–140). Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kristensen, N. P. (1995). Forty [sic] years’ insect phylogenetic systematics. Zoologische Beiträge N. F, 36, 125–140.Google Scholar
  17. Kristensen, N. P. (1997). The ground plan and basal diversification of the hexapods. In R. A. Fortey & R. H. Thomas (Eds.), Arthropod relationships (pp. 281–293). London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Kristensen, N. P. (2003). Skeleton and muscles: Adults. Lepidoptera: Moths and butterflies 2. In N. P. Kristensen (Ed.), Handbuch der Zoologie/Handbook of Zoology IV/36 (pp. 39–131). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  19. Kukalová-Peck, J. (1983). Origin of the insect wing and wing articulation from the arthropodan leg. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 61, 1618–1669. doi:10.1139/z83-217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kukalová-Peck, J. (1985). Ephemeroid wing venation based upon new gigantic Carboniferous mayflies and basic morphology, phylogeny, and metamorphosis of pterygote insects (Insecta, Ephemerida). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 63, 933–955.Google Scholar
  21. Kukalová-Peck, J. (1991). Fossil history and the evolution of hexapod structures. In I. D. Naumann, P. B. Crane, J. F. Lawrence, E. S. Neilsen, J. P. Spradbery, R. W. Taylor, M. J. Whitten, & M. J. Littlejohn (Eds.), The insects of Australia, a textbook for students and researchers (2nd ed., pp. 141–179). Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kukalová-Peck, J. (1992). The “Uniramia” do not exist: The ground plan of the Pterygota as revealed by Permian Diaphanopterodea from Russia (Insecta: Palaeodictyopteroidea). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 70, 236–255. doi:10.1139/z92-037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kukalová-Peck, J. (2008). Phylogeny of higher taxa in Insecta: Finding synapomorphies in the extant fauna and separating them from homoplasies. Evolutionary Biology, 35, 4–51. doi:10.1007/s11692-007-9013-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kukalová-Peck, J., & Brauckmann, C. (1992). Most Paleozoic Protorthoptera are ancestral hemipteroids: Major wing braces as clues to a new phylogeny of Neoptera (Insecta). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 70, 2452–2473. doi:10.1139/z92-330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kukalová-Peck, J., & Willmann, R. (1990). Lower Permian “mecopteroid-like” insects from central Europe (Insecta, Endopterygota). Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 27, 459–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marshall, C. R., Raff, E. C., & Raff, R. A. (1994). Dollo’s law and the death and resurrection of genes. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 91, 12283–12287. doi:10.1073/pnas.91.25.12283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pohl, H. (2002). Phylogeny of the Strepsiptera based on morphological data of the first instar larvae. Zoologica Scripta, 31, 123–138. doi:10.1046/j.0300-3256.2001.00078.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rasnitsyn, A. P., & Novokshonov, V. G. (1997). On the morphology of Uralia maculata (Insecta: Diaphanopterida) from the Early Permian (Kungurian) of Ural (Russia). Entomologica Scandinavica, 28, 27–38.Google Scholar
  29. Tanaka, A., & Ito, T. (1997). Studies of the genetics and expression of Prowing (Pw): A primitive homeotic mutant of the German cockroach, Blattella germanica. Zoological Science, 14, 339–346. doi:10.2108/zsj.14.95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wheeler, W. C. (1997). Sampling, groundplans, total evidence and the systematics of arthropods. In R. A. Fortey & R. H. Thomas (Eds.), Arthropod relationships (pp. 87–95). London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  31. Willmann, R. (1997). Advances and problems in insect phylogeny. In R. A. Fortey & R. H. Thomas (Eds.), Arthropod relationships (pp. 269–279). London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  32. Willmann, R. (1999). The Upper Carboniferous Lithoneura lameeri (Insecta, Ephemeroptera?). Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 73, 289–302.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olivier Béthoux
    • 1
    • 2
  • Niels P. Kristensen
    • 3
  • Michael S. Engel
    • 4
  1. 1.Freiberg University of Mining and TechnologyInstitute of Geology, Department of PalaeontologyFreibergGermany
  2. 2.State Natural History Collections of DresdenMuseum of ZoologyDresdenGermany
  3. 3.Natural History Museum of DenmarkUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  4. 4.Division of Entomology (Palaeoentomology), Natural History MuseumUniversity of Kansas1501 Crestline Drive-Suite 140LawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations