Advertisement

Frontiers of Medicine

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 202–212 | Cite as

Physiological effects of weightlessness: countermeasure system development for a long-term Chinese manned spaceflight

  • Linjie WangEmail author
  • Zhili Li
  • Cheng Tan
  • Shujuan Liu
  • Jianfeng Zhang
  • Siyang He
  • Peng Zou
  • Weibo Liu
  • Yinghui Li
Review
  • 74 Downloads

Abstract

The Chinese space station will be built around 2020. As a national space laboratory, it will offer unique opportunities for studying the physiological effects of weightlessness and the efficacy of the countermeasures against such effects. In this paper, we described the development of countermeasure systems in the Chinese space program. To emphasize the need of the Chinese space program to implement its own program for developing countermeasures, we reviewed the literature on the negative physiological effects of weightlessness, the challenges of completing missions, the development of countermeasure devices, the establishment of countermeasure programs, and the efficacy of the countermeasure techniques in American and Russian manned spaceflights. In addition, a brief overview was provided on the Chinese research and development on countermeasures to discuss the current status and goals of the development of countermeasures against physiological problems associated with weightlessness.

Keywords

countermeasure physiological effects of weightlessness effect evaluation long-term manned spaceflight 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the native English-speaking scientists of Charlesworth Author Services and International Research Promotion for editing our manuscript. This work was supported by the Chinese Manned Space Flight Project, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81571845) and the Key Project of Logistics Research (No. BWS14C024).

References

  1. 1.
    Meck JV, Dreyer SA, Warren LE. Long-duration head-down bed rest: project overview, vital signs, and fluid balance. Aviat Space Environ Med 2009; 80(5 Suppl): A1–A8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marshall-Goebel K, Mulder E, Bershad E, Laing C, Eklund A, Malm J, Stern C, Rittweger J. Intracranial and intraocular pressure during various degrees of head-down tilt. Aerosp Med Hum Perform 2017; 88(1): 10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zange J, Müller K, Schuber M, Wackerhage H, Hoffmann U, Günther RW, Adam G, Neuerburg JM, Sinitsyn VE, Bacharev AO, Belichenko OI. Changes in calf muscle performance, energy metabolism, and muscle volume caused by long-term stay on space station MIR. Int J Sports Med 1997; 18(Suppl 4): S308–S309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Loenneke JP, Wilson JM, Bemben MG. Potential exercise countermeasures to attenuate skeletal muscle deterioration in space. J Trainology 2012; 1(1): 1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hackney KJ, Scott JM, Hanson AM, English KL, Downs ME, Ploutz-Snyder LL. The astronaut-athlete: optimizing human performance in space. J Strength Cond Res 2015; 29(12): 3531–3545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Genc KO, Mandes VE, Cavanagh PR. Gravity replacement during running in simulated microgravity. Aviat Space Environ Med 2006; 77(11): 1117–1124Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meck JV, Reyes CJ, Perez SA, Goldberger AL, Ziegler MG. Marked exacerbation of orthostatic intolerance after long-vs. shortduration spaceflight in veteran astronauts. Psychosom Med 2001; 63 (6): 865–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tipton CM. ACSM’s Advanced Exercise Physiology. Baltimore, New York: American College of Sports Medicine, 2006Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Buckey JC. Space Physiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moore AD Jr, Downs ME, Lee SMC, Feiveson AH, Knudsen P, Ploutz-Snyder L. Peak exercise oxygen uptake during and following long-duration spaceflight. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2014; 117(3): 231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heer M, Paloski WH. Space motion sickness: incidence, etiology, and countermeasures. Auton Neurosci 2006; 129(1-2): 77–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Macias BR, Liu JH, Grande-Gutierrez N, Hargens AR. Intraocular and intracranial pressures during head-down tilt with lower body negative pressure. Aerosp Med Hum Perform 2015; 86(1): 3–7Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cowell SA, Stocks JM, Evans DG, Simonson SR, Greenleaf JE. The exercise and environmental physiology of extravehicular activity. Aviat Space Environ Med 2002; 73(1): 54–67Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Human Research Program Human Health Countermeasures Element. Risk of Reduced Physical Performance Capabilities due to Reduced Aerobic Capacity. Huston: NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, 2015Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    White O, Clément G, Fortrat JO, Pavy-LeTraon A, Thonnard JL, Blanc S, Wuyts FL, Paloski WH. Towards human exploration of space: the THESEUS review series on neurophysiology research priorities. NPJ Microgravity 2016; 2:16023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Convertino VA. Consequences of cardiovascular adaptation to spaceflight: implications for the use of pharmacological countermeasures. Gravit Space Biol Bull 2005; 18(2): 59–69Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ullom-Minnich P. Prevention of osteoporosis and fractures. Am Fam Physician 1999; 60(1): 194–202Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lang T, LeBlanc A, Evans H, Lu Y, Genant H, Yu A. Cortical and trabecular bone mineral loss from the spine and hip in long-duration spaceflight. J Bone Miner Res 2004; 19(6): 1006–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lang TF. What do we know about fracture risk in long-duration spaceflight? J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2006; 6(4): 319–321Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rittweger J, Gunga HC, Felsenberg D, Kirsch KA. Muscle and bone-aging and space. J Gravit Physiol 1999; 6(1): 133–136Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Androjna C, McCabe NP, Cavanagh PR, Midura RJ. Effects of spaceflight and skeletal unloading on bone fracture healing. Clin Rev Bone Miner Metab 2012; 10(2): 61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hawley JA, Hargreaves M, Joyner MJ, Zierath JR. Integrative biology of exercise. Cell 2014; 159(4): 738–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cavanagh PR, Licata AA, Rice AJ. Exercise and pharmacological countermeasures for bone loss during long-duration space flight. Gravit Space Biol Bull 2005; 18(2): 39–58Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Petersen N, Jaekel P, Rosenberger A, Weber T, Scott J, Castrucci F, Lambrecht G, Ploutz-Snyder L, Damann V, Kozlovskaya I, Mester J. Exercise in space: the European Space Agency approach to inflight exercise countermeasures for long-duration missions on ISS. Extrem Physiol Med 2016; 5(1): 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smith SM, Heer MA, Shackelford LC, Sibonga JD, Ploutz-Snyder L, Zwart SR. Benefits for bone from resistance exercise and nutrition in long-duration spaceflight: evidence from biochemistry and densitometry. J Bone Miner Res 2012; 27(9): 1896–1906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Korth DW. Exercise countermeasure hardware evolution on ISS: the first decade. Aerosp Med Hum Perform 2015; 86(12 Suppl): A7–A13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yarmanova EN, Kozlovskaya IB, Khimoroda NN, Fomina EV. Evolution of Russian microgravity countermeasures. Aerosp Med Hum Perform 2015; 86(12 Suppl): A32–A37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kozlovskaya IB, Yarmanova EN, Yegorov AD, Stepantsov VI, Fomina EV, Tomilovaskaya ES. Russian countermeasure system for adverse effects of microgravity on long-duration ISS flights. Aerosp Med Hum Perform 2015; 86(12 Suppl): A24–A31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Heer M, Baecker N, Frings-Meuthen P, Graf S, Zwart SR, Biolo G, Smith SM. Effects of high-protein intake on bone turnover in longterm bed rest in women. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2017; 42(5): 537–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hales NW, Yamauchi K, Alicea A, Sundaresan A, Pellis NR, Kulkarni AD. A countermeasure to ameliorate immune dysfunction in in vitro simulated microgravity environment: role of cellular nucleotide nutrition. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2002; 38(4): 213–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Task Group on Research on the International Space Station Space Studies Board Division on Engineering and Physical Science. Factors affecting the utilization of the International Space Station for research in the biological and physical sciences. Washington D. C.: National Research Council of the National Academes and National Academy of Public Administration, 2003: 29–36Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Beyene N. The art of space flight exercise hardware: design and implementation. In: Space 2004 Conference and Exhibit. Sep 28–30, 2004; San Diego, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Novotny SC, Perusek GP, Rice AJ, Comstock BA, Bansal A, Cavanagh PR. A harness for enhanced comfort and loading during treadmill exercise in space. Acta Astronaut 2013; 89: 205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Genc KO, Gopalakrishnan R, Kuklis MM, Maender CC, Rice AJ, Bowersox KD, Cavanagh PR. Foot forces during exercise on the International Space Station. J Biomech 2010; 43(15): 3020–3027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hayes JC, Loerch L, Davis-Street J, Haralson C, Sams C. Current ISS exercise countermeasure: where are we now? In: 77th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Aerospace. May 14–18, 2008; Orlando, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    McCrory JL, Lemmon DR, Sommer HJ, Prout B, Smith D, Korth DW, Lucero J, Greenisen M, Moore J, Kozlovskaya I, Pestov I, Stepansov V, Miyakinchenko Y, Cavanagh PR. Evaluation of a treadmill with vibration isolation and stabilization (TVIS) for use on the International Space Station. J Appl Biomech 1999; 15(3): 292–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Belyaev MY, Babkin EV, Ryabukha SB, Ryazantsev AV. Microperturbations on the International Space Station during physical exercises of the crew. Cosm Res 2011; 49(2): 160–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cavanagh PR, Genc KO, Gopalakrishnan R, Kuklis MM, Maender CC, Rice AJ. Foot forces during typical days on the international space station. J Biomech 2010; 43(11): 2182–2188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gosseye TP, Willems PA, Heglund NC. Biomechanical analysis of running in weightlessness on a treadmill equipped with a subject loading system. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010; 110(4): 709–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Carlson DL, Durrani M, Redilla CL. Design of a resistive exercise device for use on the space shuttle. Dissertation Austin: University of Texas, 1992Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Amonette WE, Bentley JR, Lee SMC, Loehr JA, Schneider S. Ground reaction force and mechanical differences between the interim resistive exercise device (iRED) and smith machine while performing a squat. Huston: Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, 2004Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    English KL, Loehr JA, Lee SMC, Laughlin MA, Hagan RD. Reliability of strength testing using the advanced resistive exercise device and free weights. Huston: Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, 2008Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lamoreaux CD, Landeck ME. Mechanism development, testing, and lessons learned for the advanced resistive exercise device. In: Proceedings of the 38th Aerospace Mechanisms Symposium. May 17–19, 2006; Hampton, Virginia, USA. 317–330Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Niebuhr JH, Hagen RA. Development of the vibration isolation system for the advanced resistive exercise device. In: Proceedings of the 41st Aerospace Mechanisms Symposium. May 16–18, 2012; La Cañada Flintridge, California, USA. 67–80Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Loehr JA, Guilliams ME, Petersen N, Hirsch N, Kawashima S, Ohshima H. Physical training for long-duration spaceflight. Aerosp Med Hum Perform 2015; 86(12 Suppl): A14–A23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ploutz-Snyder L. Integrated resistance and aerobic training study–sprint. Huston: NASA Human Research Program Informed Consent Briefing, 2010Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Matsuo T, Ohkawara K, Seino S, Shimojo N, Yamada S, Ohshima H, Tanaka K, Mukai C. An exercise protocol designed to control energy expenditure for long-term space missions. Aviat Space Environ Med 2012; 83(8): 783–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hayes J. The first decade of ISS exercise: lessons learned on expeditions 1–25. Aerosp Med Hum Perform 2015; 86(12 Suppl): A1–A6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Schneider S. Exercise in space: a holistic approach for the benefit of human health on earth. New York: Springer International Publishing AG Switzerland, 2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Webster L, Chen JG, Flores L, Tan S. Exercise countermeasure protocol management expert system. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1993; 39(3-4): 217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Convertino VA. Exercise as a countermeasure for physiological adaptation to prolonged spaceflight. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996; 28 (8): 999–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Convertino VA, Sandler H. Exercise countermeasures for spaceflight. Acta Astronaut 1995; 35(4-5): 253–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Rao AV, Phadke AV, Patil PB, Joshi AR. Comparison of nonexercise test and step test in estimation of aerobic capacity (VO2max) in young adults. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol 2014; 4(3): 218–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wier LT, Ayers GW, Jackson AS, Rossum AC, Poston WSP, Foreyt JP. Determining the amount of physical activity needed for longterm weight control. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001; 25(5): 613–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Feiveson AH. Quantitative assessment of countermeasure efficacy for long-term space missions. In: Presentation to the Institute of Medicine Committee on strategies for small number participant clinical research trials. Sep 28, 2000; Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Coolahan JE, Feldman AB, Murphy SP. Simulation of integrated physiology based on an astronaut exercise protocol. Johns Hopkins APL Tech Dig 2004; 25(3): 201–213Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Thompson WK, Caldwell EE, Newby NJ, Humphreys BT, Lewandowski BE, Pennline JA, Ploutz-Snyder L, Mulugeta L. Integrated biomechanical modeling of lower body exercises on the advanced resistive exercise device (ARED) using LifeMOD®. In: 44th International Conference on Environmental Systems. Jul 13–17, 2014; Tucson, Arizona, USAGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Abram SR, Hodnett BL, Summers RL, Coleman TG, Hester RL. Quantitative Circulatory Physiology: an integrative mathematical model of human physiology for medical education. Adv Physiol Educ 2007; 31(2): 202–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hester RL, Brown AJ, Husband L, Iliescu R, Pruett D, Summers R, Coleman TG. HumMod: a modeling environment for the simulation of integrative human physiology. Front Physiol 2011; 2: 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Thompson WK, Gallo CA, Crentsil L, Lewandowski BE, Humphreys BT, DeWitt JK, Fincke RS, Mulugeta L. Digital astronaut project biomechanical models—biomechanical modeling of squat, single-leg squat and heel raise exercise on the hybrid ultimate lifting kit (HULK). Huston: Jonson Space Center, 2015Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Summers R, Coleman T, Meck J. Development of the digital astronaut project for the analysis of the mechanisms of physiologic adaptation to microgravity: validation of the cardiovascular system module. Acta Astronaut 2008; 63(7-10): 758–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Jiang C, Jiang S, Li J, Yao Y, Wu X, Sun X. Effect of extremity cuffs as a countermeasure against the cardiovascular deconditioning during 21 d head-down bedrest. Space Med Med Eng (Beijing) (Hang Tian Yi Xue Yu Yi Xue Gong Cheng) 1999; 12(5): 364–367 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Liu Y, Zhen J, Wu B, Zhao D, Sun H, Pan Z, Li K, Wu P, Gu Z, Zeng Y, Liu G, Geng J, Sun X. Effects of exercise training during 30 d - 6° head-down bed rest on lower limb muscle atrophy and function changes. Space Med Med Eng (Beijing) (Hang Tian Yi Xue Yu Yi Xue Gong Cheng) 2009; 22(4): 240–246 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Liu B, Zhu Y, Li Z, Chen W, Wang L, Li Y, Bai Y. Effects of 30 d -6° head down bed rest on male aerobic capacity and its protection strategy. Space Med Med Eng (Beijing)( Hang Tian Yi Xue Yu Yi Xue Gong Cheng) 2014; 27(4): 235–240 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Tan C, Cao Y, Zhang L, Yuan M, Wang H, Niu D, Zhao Q, Li Z, Chen W, Yang H, Wang L, Li Y, Bai Y. Effects of 15 d -6° headdown bed rest on female orthostatic tolerance. Space Med Med Eng (Beijing)( Hang Tian Yi Xue Yu Yi Xue Gong Cheng) 2011; 24(4): 246–252 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Nicogossian AE, Williams RS, Huntoon CL, Doarn CR, Polk JD, Schneider VS. Space Physiology and Medicine: from evidence to practice. New York: Springer Science + Business Media, 2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Arezes P. Advances in safety management and human factors. In: Proceedings of the AHFE 2016 International Conference on Safety Management and Human Factors. Jul 27–31, 2016; Walt Disney World, Florida, USA. 2016. 392–393Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Perusek G, Owings T, Ryder J, Savina M, Sheehan C, Davis BL. Validation of improved comfort and loading with the center for space medicine harness. Station Development Test Objective: Harness SDTO PI final report. Cleveland: NASA GLEN Research Center, 2011Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Tan C, Li Z, Chen S, Chen X. Investigation of gait pattern in simulated weightlessness. A Sponsored Supplement to Science — Human Performance in Space: Advancing Astronautics Research in China. 2014. 20–21Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Reinertson RC, Nelson VA, Aunon SM, Schlegel TT, Lindgren KN, Kerstman EL, Arya M, Paloski WH. Medical monitoring during the NASA artificial gravity-bed rest pilot study. J Gravit Physiol 2007; 14(1): 9–13Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Schmidt MA, Goodwin TJ, Pelligra R. Incorporation of omics analyses into artificial gravity research for space exploration countermeasure development. Metabolomics 2016; 12(2): 36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Clément GR, Bukley AP, Paloski WH. Artificial gravity as a countermeasure for mitigating physiological deconditioning during long-duration space missions. Front Syst Neurosci 2015; 9: 92Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    White RJ, Leonard JI, Rummel JA, Leach CS. A systems approach to the physiology of weightlessness. J Med Syst 1982; 6(4): 343–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Shi H, Li Y, Tang Z, Zhong C, Fan Q, Gao J, Liu J, Mi T, Zhao S, Li Y. Impact of 60 days of 6° head down bed rest on cardiopulmonary function, and the effects of Taikong Yangxin Prescription as a countermeasure. Chin J Integr Med 2014; 20(9): 654–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Yuan M, Alameddine A, Coupé M, Navasiolava NM, Li Y, Gauquelin-Koch G, Bai Y, Jiang S, Wan Y, Wang J, Li Y, Custaud MA. Effect of Chinese herbal medicine on vascular functions during 60-day head-down bed rest. Eur J Appl Physiol 2015; 115(9): 1975–1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Linjie Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Zhili Li
    • 1
  • Cheng Tan
    • 1
  • Shujuan Liu
    • 1
  • Jianfeng Zhang
    • 1
  • Siyang He
    • 1
  • Peng Zou
    • 1
  • Weibo Liu
    • 1
  • Yinghui Li
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Space Medicine Fundamentals and ApplicationChina Astronaut Research and Training CenterBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations