Successful kidney transplantation in highly sensitized patients
- 129 Downloads
Highly sensitized patients experience an increased number of rejection episodes and have poorer graft survival rates; hence, sensitization is a significant barrier to both access to and the success of organ transplantation. This study reports our experience in kidney transplantation in highly sensitized patients. Fourteen patients with sensitization or high levels of panelreactive antibodies (PRA) were studied. All patients were desensitized with pre-transplant intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)/plasmapheresis (PP) with or without rituximab and thymoglobulin induction therapy, combined with a Prograf/MMF/Pred immunosuppressive regimen. Of 14 patients, 10 showed good graft functions without acute rejection (AR) episodes. Acute cellular rejection in two patients was reversed by methylprednisolone. Two patients underwent antibody-mediated rejection; one was treated with PP/IVIG successfully, whereas the other lost graft functions due to the de novo production of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Graft functions were stable, and there were no AR episodes in other patients. Conclusively, desensitization using PP/IVIG with or without rituximab increases the likelihood of successful live-donor kidney transplantation in sensitized recipients.
KeywordsKidney transplantation desensitization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 9.Yoon H E, Hyoung B J, Hwang H S, Lee S Y, Jeon Y J, Song J C, Oh E J, Park S C, Choi B S, Moon I S, Kim Y S, Yang C W. Successful renal transplantation with desensitization in highly sensitized patients: a single center experience. J Korean Med Sci, 2009, 24(Suppl): S148–S155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Akalin E, Dinavahi R, Friedlander R, Ames S, de Boccardo G, Sehgal V, Schröppel B, Bhaskaran M, Lerner S, Fotino M, Murphy B, Bromberg J S. Addition of plasmapheresis decreases the incidence of acute antibody-mediated rejection in sensitized patients with strong donor-specific antibodies. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2008, 3(4): 1160–1167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Buehrig C K, Lager D J, Stegall M D, Kreps M A, Kremers W K, Gloor J M, Schwab T R, Velosa J A, Fidler M E, Larson T S, Griffin M D. Influence of surveillance renal allograft biopsy on diagnosis and prognosis of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy. Kidney Int, 2003, 64(2): 665–673PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar