Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Neuroanatomical substrates accounting for the effect of present hedonistic time perspective on risk preference: the mediating role of right posterior parietal cortex

Abstract

The preference for taking risk troubles people across multiple domains including health, economics, and social well-being. Prior research has demonstrated that risk preference can be influenced by time perspective (TP). However, little is known about the neural substrates underlying the effect of TP on risk preference. Here, we used a voxel-based morphometry (VBM) method across two samples to address this question. In Sample 1, the behavioral results showed a positive correlation between present hedonistic TP (PHTP) and gambling rate (the index of risk preference), indicating the higher PHTP, the greater the preference for risk. Subsequently, the whole-brain VBM results found that gambling rate was negatively correlated with the gray matter (GM) volume of a cluster in the right posterior parietal cortex (rPPC). The PHTP score was also negatively related to the GM volume of another cluster in the rPPC. We then examined an overlapping region in the rPPC using a conjunction analysis method. The GM volume of this overlapping brain region was related to both PHTP score and gambling rate. Finally, the mediation analysis found that the GM volume of overlapping region in rPPC played a role in explaining the effect of PHTP on risk preference. This result was also reproduced and validated in another independent sample. Taken together, our findings manifest that the structural variation of rPPC can account for the influence that PHTP has upon the risk preference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Abdel-khalik, & Rashad, A. (2014). Prospect theory predictions in the field: Risk seekers in settings of weak accounting controls. Journal of Accounting Literature, 33(1–2), 58–84.

  2. Adams, J. (2009). The role of time perspective in smoking cessation amongst older English adults. Health Psychology, 28(5), 529.

  3. Adams, J., & Nettle, D. (2009). Time perspective, personality and smoking, body mass, and physical activity: An empirical study. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14(1), 83–105.

  4. Alvos, L., Gregson, R., & Ross, M. W. (1993). Future time perspective in current and previous injecting drug users. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 31(2), 193–197.

  5. Andersen, R. A., & Buneo, C. A. (2002). Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25(1), 189–220.

  6. Apostolidis, T., Fieulaine, N., Simonin, L., & Rolland, G. (2006). Cannabis use, time perspective and risk perception: Evidence of a moderating effect. Psychology and Health, 21(5), 571–592.

  7. Arnold, K. M., McDermott, K. B., & Szpunar, K. K. (2011). Individual differences in time perspective predict autonoetic experience. Consciousness & Cognition, 20(3), 712–719.

  8. Aron, A. R., Fletcher, P. C., Bullmore, E. T., Sahakian, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2003). Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans. Nature Neuroscience, 6(2), 115–116.

  9. Ashburner, J. (2007). A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage, 38(1), 95–113.

  10. Ashburner, J., & Friston, K. J. (2000). Voxel-based morphometry—The methods. Neuroimage, 11(6), 805–821.

  11. Ballard, K., & Knutson, B. (2009). Dissociable neural representations of future reward magnitude and delay during temporal discounting. Neuroimage, 45(1), 143–150.

  12. Barraclough, D. J., Conroy, M. L., & Lee, D. (2004). Prefrontal cortex and decision making in a mixed-strategy game. Nature Neuroscience, 7(4), 404–410.

  13. Beenstock, J., Adams, J., & White, M. (2010). The association between time perspective and alcohol consumption in university students: Cross-sectional study. The European journal of public health, 21(4), 438–443.

  14. Bellgrove, M. A., Hester, R., & Garavan, H. (2004). The functional neuroanatomical correlates of response variability: Evidence from a response inhibition task. Neuropsychologia, 42(14), 1910–1916.

  15. Boniwell, I., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Balancing time perspective in pursuit of optimal functioning. Positive psychology in practice, 12, 141–155.

  16. Boyd, J. N., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2006). Time perspective, health, and risk taking Understanding behavior in the context of time (pp. 97-119): Psychology Press.

  17. Chen, T., Liu, L.-l., Cui, J.-f., Chen, X.-j., Wang, J., Zhang, Y.-b., . . . Shum, D. H. (2016). Present-fatalistic time perspective and life satisfaction: The moderating role of age. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 161–165.

  18. Chen, Z., Guo, Y., & Feng, T. (2018). Neuroanatomical correlates of time perspective: A voxel-based morphometry study. Behavioural Brain Research, 339.

  19. Christopoulos, G. I., Tobler, P. N., Bossaerts, P., Dolan, R. J., & Schultz, W. (2009). Neural correlates of value, risk, and risk aversion contributing to decision making under risk. Journal of Neuroscience the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 29(40), 12574–12583.

  20. Clark, L., Studer, B., Bruss, J., Tranel, D., & Bechara, A. (2014). Damage to insula abolishes cognitive distortions during simulated gambling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(16), 6098–6103.

  21. Cosenza, M., & Nigro, G. (2015). Wagering the future: Cognitive distortions, impulsivity, delay discounting, and time perspective in adolescent gambling. Journal of Adolescence, 45, 56–66.

  22. Cosenza, M., Griffiths, M. D., Nigro, G., & Ciccarelli, M. (2017). Risk-taking, delay discounting, and time perspective in adolescent gamblers: An experimental study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 33(2), 383–395.

  23. Daugherty, J. R., & Brase, G. L. (2010). Taking time to be healthy: Predicting health behaviors with delay discounting and time perspective. Personality & Individual Differences, 48(2), 202–207.

  24. Ernst, M., & Paulus, M. P. (2005). Neurobiology of decision making: A selective review from a neurocognitive and clinical perspective. Biological Psychiatry, 58(8), 597–604.

  25. Ernst, M., Nelson, E. E., McClure, E. B., Monk, C. S., Munson, S., Eshel, N., et al. (2004). Choice selection and reward anticipation: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 42(12), 1585–1597.

  26. Fieulaine, N., & Martinez, F. (2010). Time under control: Time perspective and desire for control in substance use. Addictive Behaviors, 35(8), 799–802.

  27. Fromme, K., Katz, E., & D'Amico, E. (1997). Effects of alcohol intoxication on the perceived consequences of risk taking. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 5(1), 14–23.

  28. Fu, L. P., Bi, G. H., Zou, Z. T., Wang, Y., Ye, E. M., Ma, L., Ming-Fan, & Yang, Z. (2008). Impaired response inhibition function in abstinent heroin dependents: An fMRI study. Neuroscience Letters, 438(3), 322–326.

  29. Gilaie-Dotan, S., Tymula, A., Cooper, N., Kable, J. W., Glimcher, P. W., & Levy, I. (2014). Neuroanatomy predicts individual risk attitudes. Journal of Neuroscience the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 34(37), 12394–12401.

  30. Grable, J. E. (2000). Financial risk tolerance and additional factors that affect risk taking in everyday money matters. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14(4), 625–630.

  31. Grubb, M. A., Tymula, A., Gilaie-Dotan, S., Glimcher, P. W., & Levy, I. (2016). Neuroanatomy accounts for age-related changes in risk preferences. Nature Communications, 7, 13822.

  32. Gruber, J., Cunningham, W. A., Kirkland, T., & Hay, A. C. (2012). Feeling stuck in the present? Mania proneness and history associated with present-oriented time perspective. Emotion, 12(1), 13.

  33. Hayasaka, S., Phan, K. L., Liberzon, I., Worsley, K. J., & Nichols, T. E. (2004). Nonstationary cluster-size inference with random field and permutation methods. Neuroimage, 22(2), 676–687.

  34. Hayes, A. F., & Scharkow, M. (2013). The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: Does method really matter? Psychological science, 24(10), 1918-1927. 

  35. Hodgins, D. C., & Engel, A. (2002). Future time perspective in pathological gamblers. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 190(11), 775–780.

  36. Huettel, & A, S. (2005). Decisions under uncertainty: Probabilistic context influences activation of prefrontal and parietal cortices. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(13), 3304–3311.

  37. Huettel, S. A., Gordon, A. E., Warner, B. B., Platt, H. L., & Stowe, J. C. (2006). Neural signatures of economic preferences for risk and ambiguity. Neuron, 49(5), 765–775.

  38. Huk, A. C., & Meister, M. L. R. (2012). Neural correlates and neural computations in posterior parietal cortex during perceptual decision-making. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6, 86.

  39. Jochemczyk, Ł., Pietrzak, J., Buczkowski, R., Stolarski, M., & Markiewicz, Ł. (2017). You only live once: Present-hedonistic time perspective predicts risk propensity. Personality and Individual Differences, 115, 148–153.

  40. Kable, J. W., & Glimcher, P. W. (2007). The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice. Nature Neuroscience, 10(12), 1625–1633.

  41. Kahneman, D. (2000). Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350.

  42. Keough, K. A., Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Who's smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance use. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21(2), 149–164.

  43. Koehler, S., Hasselmann, E., Wüstenberg, T., Heinz, A., & Romanczuk-Seiferth, N. (2015). Higher volume of ventral striatum and right prefrontal cortex in pathological gambling. Brain Structure and Function, 220(1), 469–477.

  44. Kolb, B., & Whishaw, I. Q. (2009). Fundamentals of human neuropsychology: Macmillan.

  45. Leon, M. I., & Shadlen, M. N. (2003). Representation of time by neurons in the posterior parietal cortex of the macaque. Neuron, 38(2), 317–327.

  46. Levy, I. (2017). Neuroanatomical substrates for risk behavior. The Neuroscientist, 23(3), 275–286.

  47. Lukavska, K. (2012). Time perspective as a predictor of massive multiplayer online role-playing game playing. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(1), 50–54.

  48. MacKillop, J., Anderson, E. J., Castelda, B. A., Mattson, R. E., & Donovick, P. J. (2006). Divergent validity of measures of cognitive distortions, impulsivity, and time perspective in pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 22(3), 339–354.

  49. McClure, S. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, 306(5695), 503–507.

  50. Mcclure, S. M., Ericson, K. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2007). Time discounting for primary rewards. Journal of Neuroscience the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 27(21), 5796.

  51. Nichols, T., Brett, M., Andersson, J., Wager, T., & Poline, J.-B. (2005). Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic. Neuroimage, 25(3), 653–660.

  52. Nicholson, N., Soane, E., Fenton-O'Creevy, M., & Willman, P. (2005). Personality and domain-specific risk taking. Journal of Risk Research, 8(2), 157–176.

  53. Nigro, G., & Cosenza, M. (2016). Living in the now: Decision-making and delay discounting in adolescent gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 32(4), 1191–1202.

  54. Oliveri, M., Koch, G., Salerno, S., Torriero, S., Gerfo, E. L., & Caltagirone, C. (2009). Representation of time intervals in the right posterior parietal cortex: Implications for a mental time line. Neuroimage, 46(4), 1173–1179.

  55. Paulus, M. P., Hozack, N. E., Zauscher, B. E., Frank, L., Brown, G. G., McDowell, J., & Braff, D. L. (2002). Parietal dysfunction is associated with increased outcome-related decision-making in schizophrenia patients. Biological Psychiatry, 51(12), 995–1004.

  56. Cho, S. S., Pellecchia, G., Aminian, K., Ray, N., Segura, B., Obeso, I., & Strafella, A. P. (2013). Morphometric correlation of impulsivity in medial prefrontal cortex. Brain topography, 26(3), 479-487.

  57. Pluck, G., Lee, K.-H., Lauder, H. E., Fox, J. M., Spence, S. A., & Parks, R. W. (2008). Time perspective, depression, and substance misuse among the homeless. The Journal of Psychology, 142(2), 159–168.

  58. Preuschoff, K., Quartz, S. R., & Bossaerts, P. (2008). Human insula activation reflects risk prediction errors as well as risk. Journal of Neuroscience, 28(11), 2745–2752.

  59. Przepiorka, A., & Blachnio, A. (2016). Time perspective in internet and Facebook addiction. Computers in Human Behavior, 60(C), 13–18.

  60. Qin, J., & Han, S. (2009). Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying identification of environmental risks. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 397–405.

  61. Reyna, V. F., & Lloyd, F. J. (2006). Physician decision making and cardiac risk: Effects of knowledge, risk perception, risk tolerance, and fuzzy processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12(3), 179–195.

  62. Robbins, R. N., & Bryan, A. (2004). Relationships between future orientation, impulsive sensation seeking, and risk behavior among adjudicated adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19(4), 428–445.

  63. Rosenbloom, T. (2003). Risk evaluation and risky behavior of high and low sensation seekers. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 31(4), 375–386.

  64. Rothspan, S., & Read, S. J. (1996). Present versus future time perspective and HIV risk among heterosexual college students. Health Psychology, 15(2), 131–134.

  65. Sansone, G., Fong, G. T., Hall, P. A., Guignard, R., Beck, F., Mons, U., et al. (2013). Time perspective as a predictor of smoking status: Findings from the international tobacco control (ITC) surveys in Scotland, France, Germany, China, and Malaysia. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 346.

  66. Sekścińska, K., Rudzinska-Wojciechowska, J., & Maison, D. (2018). Individual differences in time perspectives and risky financial choices. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 118–126.

  67. Sitkin, S. B., & Pablo, A. L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academy of Management Review, 17(1), 9–38.

  68. Smith, B. W., Mitchell, D. G. V., Hardin, M. G., Jazbec, S., Fridberg, D., Blair, R. J. R., & Ernst, M. (2009). Neural substrates of reward magnitude, probability, and risk during a wheel of fortune decision-making task. Neuroimage, 44(2), 600–609.

  69. Studer, B., Manes, F., Humphreys, G., Robbins, T. W., & Clark, L. (2013). Risk-sensitive decision-making in patients with posterior parietal and ventromedial prefrontal cortex injury. Cerebral Cortex, 25(1), 1–9.

  70. Symmonds, M., Wright, N. D., Bach, D. R., & Dolan, R. J. (2011). Deconstructing risk: Separable encoding of variance and skewness in the brain. Neuroimage, 58(4), 1139–1149.

  71. Tobler, P. N., O'Doherty, J. P., Dolan, R. J., & Schultz, W. (2007). Reward value coding distinct from risk attitude-related uncertainty coding in human reward systems. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97(2), 1621–1632.

  72. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in Prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk & Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.

  73. Valldeoriola, F., Ibarretxebilbao, N., Tolosa, E., Bargalló, N., Junqué, C., Zarei, M., & José Martí, M. (2010). Neuroanatomical correlates of impaired decision-making and facial emotion recognition in early Parkinson’s disease. European Journal of Neuroscience, 30(6), 1162–1171.

  74. Van Ittersum, K. (2012). The effect of decision makers’ time perspective on intention–behavior consistency. Marketing Letters, 23(1), 263–277.

  75. van Leijenhorst, L., Crone, E. A., & Bunge, S. A. (2006). Neural correlates of developmental differences in risk estimation and feedback processing. Neuropsychologia, 44(11), 2158–2170.

  76. Venkatraman, V., Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Huettel, S. A. (2009). Separate neural mechanisms underlie choices and strategic preferences in risky decision making. Neuron, 62(4), 593–602.

  77. Volz, K. G., Schubotz, R. I., & Cramon, D. Y. v. (2003). Predicting events of varying probability: Uncertainty investigated by fMRI. Neuroimage, 19(2), 271–280.

  78. Weber, E. U., & Milliman, R. A. (1997). Perceived risk attitudes: Relating risk perception to risky choice. Management Science, 43(2), 123–144.

  79. Wills, T. A., Sandy, J. M., & Yaeger, A. M. (2001). Time perspective and early-onset substance use: A model based on stress–coping theory. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15(2), 118–125.

  80. Wittmann, M., Simmons, A. N., Flagan, T., Lane, S. D., Wackermann, J., & Paulus, M. P. (2011). Neural substrates of time perception and impulsivity. Brain Research, 1406, 43–58.

  81. Worrell, F. C., & Mello, Z. R. (2007). The reliability and validity of Zimbardo time perspective inventory scores in academically talented adolescents. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(3), 487–504.

  82. Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288.

  83. Zimbardo, P., & Boyd, J. (2008). The time paradox: The new psychology of time that will change your life: Simon and Schuster.

  84. Zimbardo, P. G., Keough, K. A., & Boyd, J. N. (1997). Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(6), 1007–1023.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31971026).

Author information

Ting Xu and Zhiyi Chen conducted and analyzed the pilot studies. Ting Xu, Rong Zhang and Yaqi Yang collected and analyzed the data. Ting Xu, Zhiyi Chen, Fuschia Sirois and Tingyong Feng prepared and revised the manuscript.

Correspondence to Tingyong Feng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors (including Ms. Ting Xu, Mr. Zhiyi Chen, Dr. Fuschia Sirois, Ms. Rong Zhang, Ms. Yaqi Yang and Dr. Tingyong Feng) declare they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent statement

All procedures followed were in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, and the applicable revisions at the time of the investigation. Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, T., Chen, Z., Sirois, F.M. et al. Neuroanatomical substrates accounting for the effect of present hedonistic time perspective on risk preference: the mediating role of right posterior parietal cortex. Brain Imaging and Behavior (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-019-00251-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Time perspective
  • Risk preference
  • Right posterior parietal cortex
  • Voxel-based morphometry