Advertisement

Fronto-striatal activity predicts anhedonia and positive empathy subtypes

  • Grazia Mirabito
  • Zinat Taiwo
  • Matt Bezdek
  • Sharee N. LightEmail author
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, globus pallidus, and nucleus accumbens are important components of the reward circuit in the brain; and prior research suggests individuals with damage to these regions feel less pleasure (i.e., are anhedonic). However, little is known about how these brain regions relate to vicarious pleasure. Pilot fMRI data were collected from 20 participants (Mage = 22, SD = 7.0, 63% female) during a validated empathy induction paradigm that utilized video clips extracted from the television show “Extreme Makeover: Home Edition” to elicit empathic happiness (i.e. vicarious happiness) when targets display positive affect, and either empathic cheerfulness (i.e. the tendency to want to cheer someone up) or empathic concern (i.e. vicarious sadness) when targets display negative affect. Participants also completed the novel “Happy Faces” task—a behavioral measure of anhedonia—while fMRI was collected. fMRI data during task completion were used to predict trait empathy measured via self-report outside of the scanner, and accuracy on the “Happy Faces” task. Results indicate that globus pallidus activity during empathic concern-eliciting video clips significantly predicted self-reported trait empathic cheerfulness (R2 = 26%, p = 0.045). Furthermore, greater dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) activity during the Happy Faces task predicted accurate performance on the task (R2 = 34%, p < .05); and greater nucleus accumbens shell activity during the Happy Faces task predicted greater trait empathic happiness (R2 = 38%, p < .05). These results suggest that fronto-striatal circuitry contributes to our experience of anhedonia, empathic happiness, and empathic cheerfulness.

Keywords

fMRI Positive empathy Anhedonia 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by a 2015–2016 Seed grant from the Joint Georgia State University/Georgia Tech Center for Advanced Brain Imaging (CABI).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Grazia Mirabito declares that she has no conflict of interest. Zinat Taiwo declares that she has no conflict of interest. Dr. Matt Bezdek declares that he has no conflict of interest. Dr. Sharee N. Light declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Center for Advanced Brain Imaging Institutional Review Board (IRB) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Adam, R., Leff, A., Sinha, N., Turner, C., Bays, P., Draganski, B., & Husain, M. (2012). Dopamine reverses reward insensitivity in apathy following globus pallidus lesions. Cortex, 49, 1292–1303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.04.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambadar, Z., Cohn, J. F., & Reed, L. I. (2009). All smiles are not created equal: Morphology and timing of smiles perceived as amused, polite, and embarrassed/nervous. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 33, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, rS. W., Barrash, J., Bechara, A., & Tranel, D. (2006). Impairments of emotion and real-world complex behavior following childhood- or adult-onset damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12, 224–235.Google Scholar
  4. Anton J.M., Loonen, Arnt, F.A Schellekens and Svetlana A. Ivanova (2016). Circuits Regulating Pleasure and Happiness: A Focus on Addiction, Beyond the Ventral Striatum, Recent Advances in Drug Addiction Research and Clinical Applications, Dr. William Meil (Ed.), InTech,  https://doi.org/10.5772/62707.
  5. Baliki, et al. (2013). Parceling human accumbens into putative core and shell dissociates encoding of values for reward and pain. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 16383–16393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berridge, K. C., & Kringelbach, M. (2015). Pleasure Systems in the Brain. Neuron, 86, 646–664.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhatia, K. P., & Marsden, C. D. (1994). The behavioral and motor consequences of focal lesions of the basal ganglia in man. Brain, 117, 859–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blair, J. R., Leibenluft, E., & Pine, D. S. (2014). Conduct disorder and callous-unemotional traits in youth. The New England Journal of Medicine, 371, 2207–2216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castro, D.C. & Berridge, K.C. (2014). Opioid hedonic hotspot in nucleus accumbens shell: Mu, delta, and kappa maps for enhancement of sweetness “liking” and ”wanting.” Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 4239–4250.Google Scholar
  10. Cauda, F., Cavanna, A. E., D’agata, F., Sacco, K., Duca, S., & Geniniani, G. C. (2011). Functional connectivity and coactivation of the nucleus accumbens: A combined functional connectivity and structure-based meta-analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2864–2877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark, L., Cools, R., & Robbins, T. W. (2004). The neuropsychology of ventral prefrontal cortex: Decision-making and reversal learning. Brain Cognition, 55, 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohn, J. F., Zlochower, A. J., Lien, J., & Ambadar, Z. (1999). Automatic face analysis by feature tracking has high convergent validity with manual FACS coding. Psychophysiology, 36, 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dichter, G. S., Feldner, J. N., Petty, C., Bizzell, J., Ernst, M., & Smoski, M. J. (2009). The effects of psychotherapy on neural responses to rewards in major depression. Biological Psychiatry, 66, 886–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dillon, D. G., Holmes, A. J., Birk, J. L., Brooks, N., Lyons-Ruth, K., & Pizzagali, D. A. (2009). Childhood adversity is associated with left basal ganglia dysfunction during reward anticipation in adulthood. Biological Psychiatry, 66, 206–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heller, A. S., Johnstone, T., Shackman, A. S., Light, S. N., Peterson, M., Kolden, G., Kalin, N., & Davidson, R. J. (2009). Reduced capacity to sustain positive emotion in major depression reflects diminished maintenance of fronto-striatal brain activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 22445–22450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heller, A. S., van Reekum, C. M., Schaefer, S. M., Lapate, R. C., Radler, B. T., Ryff, C. D., & Davidson, R. J. (2013). Sustained striatal activity predicts eudaimonic well-being and cortisol output. Psychological Science, 24, 2191–2200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kringelbach, M.L. & Berridge, K.C. (2012). The joyful mind. Scientific American, August, 40–45, 307.Google Scholar
  18. Light, S. N., Coan, J. A., Zahn-Waxler, C., Frye, C., Goldsmith, H. H. & Davidson, R. J. (2009). Empathy is associated with dynamic change in prefrontal brain electrical activity during positive emotion in children. Child Development, 80, 1210–1231.Google Scholar
  19. Light, S. N., Heller, A. S., Johnstone, T., Kolden, G. G., Peterson, M. J., Kalin, N., & Davidson, R. J. (2011). Reduced ventrolateral prefrontal cortex activity while inhibiting positive affect is associated with improvement in hedonic capacity after 8 weeks of antidepressant treatment in major depressive disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 70, 962–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Light, S. N., Moran, Z. D., Swander, L., Le, V., Cage, B., Burghy, C., Westbrooke, C., Greishar, L., & Davidson, R. J. (2015). Electromyographically assessed empathic concern and empathic happiness predict increased prosocial behavior in adults. Biological Psychology, 104, 116–129 PMCID: PMC5104350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lindquist, K. A., Satpute, A. B., Wager, T. D., Weber, J., & Feldman Barrett, L. (2013). The brain basis of positive and negative affect: Evidence from a meta-analysis of the human neuroimaging literature. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 1910–1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller, J. M., Vorel, S. R., Tranguch, A. J., Kenny, E. T., Mazzoni, P., van Gorp, W. G., & Kleber, H. D. (2006). Anhedonia after a selective bilateral lesion of the globus pallidus. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 786–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morelli, S., Sacchet, M. D., & Zaki, J. (2015). Common and distinct neural correlates of personal and vicarious reward: A quantitative meta-analysis. Neuroimage, 112, 244–253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.056.
  24. Niedenthal, P. M., Mermillod, M., Maringer, M., & Hess, U. (2010). The simulation of smiles (SIMS) model: Embodied simulation and the meaning of facial expression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 417–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Seara-Cardoso, A., & Viding, E. (2014). Functional neuroscience of psychopathic personality in adults. Journal of Personality, 83, 723–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science, 303, 1157–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Soucy Chartier, I., & Provencher, M. D. (2013). Behavioral activation for depression: Efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Journal of Affective Disorders, 145, 292–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Szczepanski, S. M., & Knight, R. T. (2014). Insights into human behavior from lesions to the prefrontal cortex. Neuron, 83(5), 1002–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tindell, A. J., Berridge, K. C., & Aldridge, J. W. (2004). Ventral pallidal representation of pavlovian cues and reward: Population and rate codes. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 1058–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Treadway, M. T., & Zald, D. H. (2011). Reconsidering anhedonia in depression: Lessons from translational neuroscience. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 537–555.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.06.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vijayaraghavan, L., Vaidya, J. G., Humphreys, C. T., Beglinger, L. J., & Paradiso, S. (2008). Emotional and motivational changes after bilateral lesions of the globus pallidus. Neuropsychology, 22, 412–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zacharopoulos, G., Lancaster, T. M., Bracht, T., Ihssen, N., Maio, G. R., & Linden, D. E. J. (2016). A hedonism hub in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 3921–3927.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Neuroscience InstituteGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Dynamic Cognition LaboratoryWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA
  4. 4.Positive Affective Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of PsychologyGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  5. 5.Center for Advanced Brain Imaging (CABI)AtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations