Illusory limb movements activate different brain networks than imposed limb movements: an ALE meta-analysis
- 228 Downloads
Proprioceptive information allows us to perform smooth coordinated movements by constantly updating us with knowledge of the position of our limbs in space. How this information is combined and processed to form conscious perceptions of limb position is still relatively unknown. Several functional neuroimaging studies have attempted to tease out the brain areas responsible for proprioceptive processing in the human brain. Yet there still exists some disagreement in the specific brain regions involved. In order to consolidate the current knowledge in the field, we performed a systematic review of the literature and an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of proprioception. We identified 12 studies that used a proprioceptive stimulus of the upper extremity for ALE analysis (n = 141 participants). Two types of stimuli (illusion of movement induced through muscle tendon vibration and passive/imposed movements) were found to be most commonly used to probe proprioceptive networks in the brain. ALE analysis of these two stimulus types revealed that both were associated with activation in the left precentral, postcentral, and anterior cingulate gyri. Interestingly, different patterns of activation were also observed between illusions of movement and imposed movement. In the left hemisphere, imposed movements resulted in activations that were more inferior in the post-central gyrus. In the right hemisphere, imposed movements resulted in two clusters of activation in the inferior aspect of the precentral gyrus and the hand area of the post-central gyrus, while illusions of movement resulted in a single cluster of activation in the inferior parietal lobule. These results suggest that illusions of movement without limb displacement may activate different brain areas compared with actual limb displacement. Careful consideration should be made in future studies when selecting a proprioceptive stimulus to probe these brain networks.
KeywordsProprioception Activation likelihood estimation Meta-analysis Neuroimage fMRI Position sense Kinesthesis
This work was supported by the RHISE HBI-Melbourne Trainee Exchange Program (awarded to JMK and supervised by LMC; the program is co-supported by Rebecca Hotchkiss International Scholar Exchange and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, and the University of Melbourne and Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne). JMK was supported by an Alberta-Innovates Health-Solutions MD/PhD studentship. The work was also supported by NHMRC project grant (APP1022684 to LMC); James S. McDonnell Foundation Collaborative Award (#220020413 to LMC); NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Injury (#1077898 to LMC); Victorian Government’s Operational Infrastructure Support Program; an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship awarded to LMC [#FT0992299].
Compliance with ethical standards
This work was supported by a RHISE HBI-Melbourne Trainee Exchange Program (awarded to JMK and supervised by LMC; the program is co-supported by Rebecca Hotchkiss International Scholar Exchange and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, and the University of Melbourne and Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne). JMK was supported by an Alberta-Innovates Health-Solutions MD/PhD studentship. The work was also supported by NHMRC project grant (APP1022684 to LMC); James S. McDonnell Foundation Collaborative Award (#220020413 to LMC); NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Injury (#1077898 to LMC); Victorian Government’s Operational Infrastructure Support Program; an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship awarded to LMC [#FT0992299].
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article contains data from previously published studies and does not contain any new data from human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Ben-Shabat, E., Matyas, T. A., Pell, G. S., Brodtmann, A., & Carey, L. M. (2015). The right Supramarginal Gyrus is important for proprioception in healthy and stroke-affected participants: a functional MRI study. Frontiers in Neurology, 6, 248. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2015.00248.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Eickhoff, S. B., Laird, A. R., Grefkes, C., Wang, L. E., Zilles, K., & Fox, P. T. (2009). Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data : a random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty. Human Brain Mapping, 30(November 2008), 2907–2926. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20718.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Eickhoff, S. B., Bzdok, D., Laird, A. R., Roski, C., Zilles, K., & Fox, P. T. (2011). Co-activation patterns distinguish cortical modules, their connectivity and functional differentiation. NeuroImage, 57(3), 938–949. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.021.Co-activation.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Findlater, S. E., Desai, J. A., Semrau, J. A., Kenzie, J. M., Rorden, C., Herter, T. M., et al. (2016). Central perception of position sense involves a distributed neural network – Evidence from lesion-behaviour analyses. Cortex, 79, 42–56. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.03.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gardner, E., & Johnson, K. (2013). Touch. In Principles of Neural Science (5th edn, pp. 498–526). McGraw-Hill Medical.Google Scholar
- Goble, D. J., Coxon, J. P., Van Impe, A., Geurts, M., Van Hecke, W., Sunaert, S., et al. (2012). The neural basis of central proprioceptive processing in older versus younger adults: an important sensory role for right putamen. Human Brain Mapping, 33(4), 895–908. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21257.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hagura, N., Oouchida, Y., Aramaki, Y., Okada, T., Matsumura, M., Sadato, N., & Naito, E. (2009). Visuokinesthetic perception of hand movement is mediated by cerebro-cerebellar interaction between the left cerebellum and right parietal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 19(1), 176–186. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn068.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kenzie, J. M., Semrau, J. A., Findlater, S. E., Herter, T. M., Hill, M. D., Scott, S. H., & Dukelow, S. P. (2014). Anatomical correlates of proprioceptive impairments following acute stroke: a case series. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 342(1–2), 52–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.04.025.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kenzie, J. M., Semrau, J. A., Findlater, S. E., Yu, A. Y., Jamsheed, A., Herter, T. M., et al. (2016). Localization of impaired kinesthetic processing post-stroke. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00505.
- Loubinoux, I., Tombari, D., Pariente, J., Gerdelat-Mas, A., Franceries, X., Cassol, E., et al. (2005). Modulation of behavior and cortical motor activity in healthy subjects by a chronic administration of a serotonin enhancer. NeuroImage, 27(2), 299–313. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.023.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Naito, E., Ehrsson, H. H., Geyer, S., Zilles, K., & Roland, P. E. (1999). Illusory arm movements activate cortical motor areas: a positron emission tomography study. The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 19(14), 6134–6144 Retrieved from http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/content/full/19/14/6134%5Cnpapers://894df71d-82e4-4028-a0bd-f8d269a11b2e/Paper/p8442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Naito, E., Nakashima, T., Kito, T., Aramaki, Y., Okada, T., & Sadato, N. (2007). Human limb-specific and non-limb-specific brain representations during kinesthetic illusory movements of the upper and lower extremities. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 25(11), 3476–3487. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05587.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Radovanovic, S., Korotkov, A., Ljubisavljevic, M., Lyskov, E., Thunberg, J., Kataeva, G., et al. (2002). Comparison of brain activity during different types of proprioceptive inputs: a positron emission tomography study. Experimental Brain Research, 143(3), 276–285. doi: 10.1007/s00221-001-0994-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stoesz, M. R., Zhang, M., Weisser, V. D., Prather, S. C., Mao, H., & Sathian, K. (2003). Neural networks active during tactile form perception: common and differential activity during macrospatial and microspatial tasks. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 50(1–2), 41–49. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8760(03)00.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tong, D.-M. D.-M., Zhou, Y.-T. Y.-T., Wang, G.-S. G.-S., Cheng, X.-D., Yang, T.-H. T.-H., Chang, C.-H. C.-H., & Wang, Y.-W. Y.-W. (2010). Hemorrhagic pure sensory strokes in the thalamus and Striatocapsular area: causes, clinical features and long-term outcome. European Neurology, 64(5), 275–279. doi: 10.1159/000320938.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tyson, S. F., Hanley, M., Chillala, J., Selley, A. B., & Tallis, R. C. (2008). Sensory loss in hospital-admitted people with stroke: characteristics, associated factors, and relationship with function. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 22(2), 166–172. doi: 10.1177/1545968307305523.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van de Winckel, A., Sunaert, S., Wenderoth, N., Peeters, R., Van Hecke, P., Feys, H., et al. (2005). Passive somatosensory discrimination tasks in healthy volunteers: differential networks involved in familiar versus unfamiliar shape and length discrimination. NeuroImage, 26(2), 441–453. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.058.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Van de Winckel, A., Wenderoth, N., De Weerdt, W., Sunaert, S., Peeters, R., Van Hecke, W., et al. (2012). Frontoparietal involvement in passively guided shape and length discrimination: a comparison between subcortical stroke patients and healthy controls. Experimental Brain Research, 220(2), 179–189. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3128-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar