Neural foundation of human moral reasoning: an ALE meta-analysis about the role of personal perspective
- 679 Downloads
Moral sense is defined as a feeling of the rightness or wrongness of an action that knowingly causes harm to people other than the agent. The large amount of data collected over the past decade allows drawing some definite conclusions about the neurobiological foundations of moral reasoning as well as a systematic investigation of methodological variables during fMRI studies. Here, we verified the existence of converging and consistent evidence in the current literature by means of a meta-analysis of fMRI studies of moral reasoning, using activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. We also tested for a possible neural segregation as function of the perspective used during moral reasoning i.e., first or third person perspectives. Results demonstrate the existence of a wide network of areas underpinning moral reasoning, including orbitofrontal cortex, insula, amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex as well as precuneus and posterior cingulate cortex. Within this network we found a neural segregation as a function of the personal perspective, with 1PP eliciting higher activation in the bilateral insula and superior temporal gyrus as well as in the anterior cingulate cortex, lingual and fusiform gyri, middle temporal gyrus and precentral gyrus in the left hemisphere, and 3PP eliciting higher activation in the bilateral amygdala, the posterior cingulate cortex, insula and supramarginal gyrus in the left hemisphere as well as the medial and ventromedial prefrontal cortex in the right hemisphere. These results shed some more light on the contribution of these areas to moral reasoning, strongly supporting a functional specialization as a function of the perspective used during moral reasoning.
KeywordsMoral judgment ALE meta-analysis Moral dilemmas Moral justice Moral sense First person perspective Third person perspective
Compliance with ethical standards
Human and animal rights and informed consent
No animal or human studies were carried out by the authors for this article and data from previous studies were collected using PubMed database.
Conflict of interest
Maddalena Boccia, Claudia Dacquino, Laura Piccardi, Pierluigi Cordellieri, Cecilia Guariglia, Fabio Ferlazzo, Stefano Ferracuti and Anna Maria Giannini declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Anderson, S. W., Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1999). Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 1032–1037. doi: 10.1038/14833.
- Avram, M., Hennig-Fast, K., Bao, Y., Poppel, E., Reiser, M., Blautzik, J., ... Gutyrchik, E. (2014). Neural correlates of moral judgments in first- and third-person perspectives: implications for neuroethics and beyond. BMC Neuroscience, 15, 39. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-15-39.
- Cáceda, R., James, G. A., Ely, T. D., Snarey, J., & Kilts, C. D. (2011). Mode of effective connectivity within a putative neural network differentiates moral cognitions related to care and justice ethics. PloS One, 6(2), e14730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014730.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Chiong, W., Wilson, S. M., D’Esposito, M., Kayser, A. S., Grossman, S. N., Poorzand, P., Seeley, W. W., Miller, B. L., & Rankin, K. P. (2013). The salience network causally influences default mode network activity during moral reasoning. Brain, 136(6), 1929–1941. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt066.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Ciaramelli, E., Braghittoni, D., & Di Pellegrino, G. (2012). It is the outcome that counts! Damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex disrupts the integration of outcome and belief information for moral judgment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18, 962–971.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cushman, F., Murray, D., Gordon-mckeon, S., Wharton, S., & Greene, J. D. (2012). Judgment before principle: engagement of the frontoparietal control network in condemning harms of omission. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(8), 888–895. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr072.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eickhoff, S. B., Laird, A. R., Grefkes, C., Wang, L. E., Zilles, K., & Fox, P. T. (2009). Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: a random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 2907–2926.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Greene, J. (2013). Moral tribes: Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. New York: The Penguin Press, HC.Google Scholar
- Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. New York: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
- Kagan, J. (1984). The nature of the child. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Kohlberg, L. (1964). Development of moral character and moral ideology. In M. L. Hoffman, & L. W. Hoffman (Eds.), Review of child development research. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Kohlberg, L., Levine, C., & Hewer, A. (1983). Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics. Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
- Moll, J., Oliveira-Souza, R., Zahn, R., & Grafman, J. (2008b). The cognitive neuroscience of moral emotions. In Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology (vol. 3, pp. 1–17). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Nakao, T., Ohira, H., & Northoff, G. (2012). Distinction between externally vs. internally guided decision-making: operational differences, meta-analytical comparisons and their theoretical implications. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6(31). doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00031.
- Parkinson, C., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Koralus, P. E., Mendelovici, A., McGeer, V., & Wheatley, T. (2011). Is morality unified? Evidence that distinct neural systems underlie moral judgments of harm, dishonesty, and disgust. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(10), 3162–3180.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pascual, L., Gallardo-Pujol, D., & Rodrigues, P. (2013). How does morality work in the brain? A functional and structural perspective of moral behavior. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 7(65). doi: 10.3389/fnint.2013.00065.
- Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. Brace Jovanovich: Harcourt.Google Scholar
- Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgment of the child. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Prehn, K., Wartenburger, I., Mériau, K., Scheibe, C., Goodenough, O. R., Villringer, A., & Heekeren, H. R. (2008). Individual differences in moral judgment competence influence neural correlates of socio-normative judgments. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3(1), 33–46. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsm037.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Pujol, J., Batalla, I., Contreras-Rodríguez, O., Harrison, B. J., Pera, V., Hernández-Ribas, R., Real, E., Bosa, L., Soriano-Mas, C., Deus, J., López-Solà, M., Pifarré, J., Menchón, J. M., & Cardoner, N. (2012). Breakdown in the brain network subserving moral judgment in criminal psychopathy. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(8), 917–923. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsr075.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robertson, D., Snarey, J., Ousley, O., Harenski, K., Bowman, F. D., Gilkey, R., & Kilts, C. (2007). The neural processing of moral sensitivity to issues of justice and care. Neuropsychologia, 45, 755–766. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.08.014.
- Shaver, K. G. (Ed.) (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Shenhav, A., & Greene, J. D. (2014). Integrative moral judgment: dissociating the roles of the amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 34(13), 4741–4749. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3390-13.2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Turiel, E., Killen, M., & Helwig, C. (1987). Morality: Its structure, functions, and vagaries. In J. Kagan, & S. Lamb (Eds.), The emergence of morality in young children (pp. 155–243). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Yeo, B. T., Krienen, F. M., Sepulcre, J., Sabuncu, M. R., Lashkari, D., Hollinshead, M., Roffman, J. L., Smoller, J. W., Zöllei, L., Polimeni, J. R., Fischl, B., Liu, H., & Buckner, R. L. (2011). The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. Journal of Neurophysiology, 106(3), 1125–1165. doi: 10.1152/jn.00338.2011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yoder, K. J., & Decety, J. (2014). The good, the bad, and the just: justice sensitivity predicts neural response during moral evaluation of actions performed by others. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 34(12), 4161–4166. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4648-13.2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Young, L., Camprodon, J. A., Hauser, M., Pascual-Leone, A., & Saxe, R. (2010). Disruption of the right temporoparietal junction with transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces the role of beliefs in moral judgments. Pnas, 107(15), 6753–6758. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914826107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar