Structural covariance mapping delineates medial and medio-lateral temporal networks in déjà vu
- 495 Downloads
Déjà vu (DV) is an eerie phenomenon experienced frequently as an aura of temporal lobe epilepsy, but also reported commonly by healthy individuals. The former pathological manifestation appears to result from aberrant neural activity among brain structures within the medial temporal lobes. Recent studies also implicate medial temporal brain structures in the non-pathological experience of DV, but as one element of a diffuse neuroanatomical correlate; it remains to be seen if neural activity among the medial temporal lobes also underlies this benign manifestation. The present study set out to investigate this. Due to its unpredictable and infrequent occurrence, however, non-pathological DV does not lend itself easily to functional neuroimaging. Instead, we draw on research showing that brain structure covaries among regions that interact frequently as nodes of functional networks. Specifically, we assessed whether grey-matter covariance among structures implicated in non-pathological DV differs according to the frequency with which the phenomenon is experienced. This revealed two diverging patterns of structural covariation: Among the first, comprised primarily of medial temporal structures and the caudate, grey-matter volume becomes more positively correlated with higher frequency of DV experience. The second pattern encompasses medial and lateral temporal structures, among which greater DV frequency is associated with more negatively correlated grey matter. Using a meta-analytic method of co-activation mapping, we demonstrate a higher probability of functional interactions among brain structures constituting the former pattern, particularly during memory-related processes. Our findings suggest that altered neural signalling within memory-related medial temporal brain structures underlies both pathological and non-pathological DV.
KeywordsDéjà vu Memory Grey matter Structural co-variance Meta-analytic connectivity modelling
This work was supported by the project “CEITEC – Central European Institute of Technology” (CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0068) from European Regional Development Fund. We wish to thank Natasa Kovacevic for her assistance with our structural PLS pipelines.
Compliance with ethical standards
This work was supported by the project “CEITEC – Central European Institute of Technology” (CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0068) from European Regional Development Fund.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The study was approved by the Ethics Review Board of St. Anne’s Hospital, Brno, and conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki (1964). Written informed consent was obtained from every participant prior to the experiment.
- Aggleton, J. P., & Brown, M. W. (1999). Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal–anterior thalamic axis. Behavioral and brain sciences, 22(03), 425--444.Google Scholar
- Aggleton, J. P., Dumont, J. R., & Warburton, E. C. (2011). Unraveling the contributions of the diencephalon to recognition memory: a review. Learning & Memory, 18(6), 384--400. Google Scholar
- Augustine, J. R. (1996). Circuitry and functional aspects of the insular lobe in primates including humans. Brain Research Reviews, 22(3), 229--244.Google Scholar
- Berntson, G. G., Norman, G. J., Bechara, A., Bruss, J., Tranel, D., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2011). The insula and evaluative processes. Psychological science, 22(1), 80--86.Google Scholar
- Chase, H. W., Clos, M., Dibble, S., Fox, P., Grace, A. A., Phillips, M. L., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2015). Evidence for an anterior–posterior differentiation in the human hippocampal formation revealed by meta-analytic parcellation of fMRI coordinate maps: focus on the subiculum. NeuroImage, 113, 44–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Eickhoff, S. B., Laird, A. R., Grefkes, C., Wang, L. E., Zilles, K., & Fox, P. T. (2009). Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: a random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty. Human Brain Mapping, 30(9), 2907–2926.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Khundrakpam, B. S., Reid, A., Brauer, J., Carbonell, F., Lewis, J., Ameis, S., Karama, S., Lee, J., Chen, Z., Das, S., & Evans, A. C. (2013). Developmental changes in organization of structural brain networks. Cerebral Cortex, 23(9), 2072–2085. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs187.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- O’Connor, A. R., & Moulin, C. J. A. (2013). Déjà vu experiences in healthy subjects are unrelated to laboratory tests of recollection and familiarity for word stimuli. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(881). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00881.
- Rottschy, C., Caspers, S., Roski, C., Reetz, K., Dogan, I., Schulz, J. B., Zilles, K., Laird, A. R., Fox, P. T., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2013). Differentiated parietal connectivity of frontal regions for “what” and “where” memory. Brain Structure and Function, 218(6), 1551–1567.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rykhlevskaia, E., Gratton, G., & Fabiani, M. (2008). Combining structural and functional neuroimaging data for studying brain connectivity: a review. Psychophysiology, 45(2), 173--187.Google Scholar
- Ullsperger, M., Harsay, H. A., Wessel, J. R., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2010). Conscious perception of errors and its relation to the anterior insula. Brain Structure and Function, 214(5-6), 629--643.Google Scholar
- Winkler, A. M., Kochunov, P., Blangero, J., Almasy, L., Zilles, K., Fox, P. T., Duggirala, R., & Glahn, D. C. (2009). Cortical thickness or grey matter volume? The importance of selecting the phenotype for imaging genetics studies. NeuroImage, 53(3), 1135–1146.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Wolf, R. C., Sambataro, F., Vasic, N., Depping, M. S., Thomann, P. A., Landwehrmeyer, G. B., Süssmuth, S. D., & Orth, M. (2014). Abnormal resting-state connectivity of motor and cognitive networks in early manifest Huntington’s disease. Psychological Medicine, 44(15), 3341–3356.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar