BAS-drive trait modulates dorsomedial striatum activity during reward response-outcome associations
- 567 Downloads
According to the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory, behavioral studies have found that individuals with stronger reward sensitivity easily detect cues of reward and establish faster associations between instrumental responses and reward. Neuroimaging studies have shown that processing anticipatory cues of reward is accompanied by stronger ventral striatum activity in individuals with stronger reward sensitivity. Even though establishing response-outcome contingencies has been consistently associated with dorsal striatum, individual differences in this process are poorly understood. Here, we aimed to study the relation between reward sensitivity and brain activity while processing response-reward contingencies. Forty-five participants completed the BIS/BAS questionnaire and performed a gambling task paradigm in which they received monetary rewards or punishments. Overall, our task replicated previous results that have related processing high reward outcomes with activation of striatum and medial frontal areas, whereas processing high punishment outcomes was associated with stronger activity in insula and middle cingulate. As expected, the individual differences in the activity of dorsomedial striatum correlated positively with BAS-Drive. Our results agree with previous studies that have related the dorsomedial striatum with instrumental performance, and suggest that the individual differences in this area may form part of the neural substrate responsible for modulating instrumental conditioning by reward sensitivity.
KeywordsFMRI Dorsal striatum Reward sensitivity Personality Behavioral approach system Reinforcement sensitivity theory BIS/BAS
Compliance with ethical standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional Review Board of the Universitat Jaume I and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
The project was supported by grants PSI2010-20,168 from Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, P1•1B2011-09 from the Universitat Jaume I to CA, and grants 040/2011 from Spanish National Drug Strategy Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, and PSI2012-33,054 from Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad to ABL.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Ávila, C., & Torrubia, R. (2008). Performance and conditioning studies. In P. Corr (Ed.), Reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (pp. 228–260). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Balleine, B. W., Delgado, M. R., & Hikosaka, O. (2007). The role of the dorsal striatum in reward and decision-making. The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 27(31), 8161–8165.Google Scholar
- Beaver, J. D., Lawrence, A. D., van Ditzhuijzen, J., Davis, M. H., Woods, A., & Calder, A. J. (2006). Individual differences in reward drive predict neural responses to images of food. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 26(19), 5160–5166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Boileau, I., Payer, D., Chugani, B., Lobo, D., Behzadi, A., Rusjan, P. M., et al. (2013a). The D2/3 dopamine receptor in pathological gambling: a positron emission tomography study with [11C]-(+)-propyl-hexahydro-naphtho-oxazin and [11C]raclopride. Addiction, 108(5), 953–963.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boileau, I., Payer, D., Chugani, B., Lobo, D. S. S., Houle, S., Wilson, A. A., et al. (2013b). In vivo evidence for greater amphetamine-induced dopamine release in pathological gambling: a positron emission tomography study with [(11)C]-(+)-PHNO. Molecular Psychiatry, 19, 1–9.Google Scholar
- Bustamante, J.-C., Barrós-Loscertales, A., Costumero, V., Fuentes-Claramonte, P., Rosell-Negre, P., Ventura-Campos, N., et al. (2014). Abstinence duration modulates striatal functioning during monetary reward processing in cocaine patients. Addiction Biology, 19(5), 885–894.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cai, C., Yuan, K., Yin, J., Feng, D., Bi, Y., Li, Y., et al. (in press). Striatum morphometry is associated with cognitive control deficits and symptom severity in internet gaming disorder. Brain Imaging and Behavior.Google Scholar
- Costumero, V., Barrós-Loscertales, A., Bustamante, J. C., Ventura-Campos, N., Fuentes, P., & Ávila, C. (2013a). Reward sensitivity modulates connectivity among reward brain areas during processing of anticipatory reward cues. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 38(3), 2399–2407.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diekhof, E. K., Kaps, L., Falkai, P., & Gruber, O. (2012). The role of the human ventral striatum and the medial orbitofrontal cortex in the representation of reward magnitude - an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of passive reward expectancy and outcome processing. Neuropsychologia, 50(7), 1252–1266.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dreher, J. C., Schmidt, P. J., Kohn, P., Furman, D., Rubinow, D., & Berman, K. F. (2007). Menstrual cycle phase modulates reward-related neural function in women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(7), 2465–2470.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Gray, J. A. (1987). The neuropsychology of emotion and personality. In S. M. Stahl, S. D. Iverson, & E. C. Goodman (Eds.), Cognitive neurochemistry (pp. 171–190). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry in to the functions of the septo-hippocampal system (2nd ed., ). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- He, Z., Cassaday, H. J., Bonardi, C., & Bibby, P. A. (2013). Do personality traits predict individual differences in excitatory and inhibitory learning? Frontiers in Psychology, 4(MAY), 1–12.Google Scholar
- Hyatt, C. J., Assaf, M., Muska, C. E., Rosen, R. I., Thomas, A. D., Johnson, M. R., et al. (2012). Reward-related dorsal striatal activity differences between former and current cocaine dependent individuals during an interactive competitive game. PloS One, 7(5), e34917.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Knutson, B., Adams, C. M., Fong, G. W., & Hommer, D. (2001). Anticipation of increasing monetary reward selectively recruits nucleus accumbens. The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 21(16), RC159.Google Scholar
- Knutson, B., Delgado, M. R., & Phillips, P. E. M. (2008). Representation of subjective value in the striatum. In P. W. Glimcher, C. F. Camerer, E. Fehr, & R. A. Poldrack (Eds.), Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain (pp. 389–406). Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Li, Y., Qiao, L., Sun, J., Wei, D., Li, W., Qiu, J., et al. (2014). Gender-specific neuroanatomical basis of behavioral inhibition/approach systems (BIS/BAS) in a large sample of young adults: a voxel-based morphometric investigation. Behavioural Brain Research, 274, 400–408.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.Google Scholar
- Pickering, A. D., & Gray, J. A. (2001). Dopamine, appetitive reinforcement, and the neuropsychology of human learning : an individual differences approach. In A. Eliasz, & A. Angleitner (Eds.), Advances in research on temperament (pp. 113–149). Lengerich, Germany: PABST Science Publishers.Google Scholar
- Volkow, N. D., Wang, G.-J., Telang, F., Fowler, J. S., Logan, J., Childress, A.-R., et al. (2006). Cocaine cues and dopamine in dorsal striatum: mechanism of craving in cocaine addiction. The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 26(24), 6583–6588.Google Scholar