Gender differences in creative thinking: behavioral and fMRI findings
- 2.5k Downloads
Gender differences in creativity have been widely studied in behavioral investigations, but this topic has rarely been the focus of neuroscientific research. The current paper presents follow-up analyses of a previous fMRI study (Abraham et al., Neuropsychologia 50(8):1906–1917, 2012b), in which behavioral and brain function during creative conceptual expansion as well as general divergent thinking were explored. Here, we focus on gender differences within the same sample. Conceptual expansion was assessed with the alternate uses task relative to the object location task, whereas divergent thinking was assessed in terms of responses across both the alternate uses and object location tasks relative to n-back working memory tasks. While men and women were indistinguishable in terms of behavioral performance across all tasks, the pattern of brain activity while engaged in the tasks in question was indicative of strategy differences between the genders. Brain areas related to semantic cognition, rule learning and decision making were preferentially engaged in men during conceptual expansion, whereas women displayed higher activity in regions related to speech processing and social perception. During divergent thinking, declarative memory related regions were strongly activated in men, while regions involved in theory of mind and self-referential processing were more engaged in women. The implications of gender differences in adopted strategies or cognitive style when faced with generative tasks are discussed.
KeywordsSex differences Creative cognition Neuroimaging Semantic cognition Divergent thinking Cognitive style Cognitive strategy Conceptual expansion
This research was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within the research project AB390/1 which was awarded to AA. We thank the Bender Institute for Neuroimaging (BION) for their technical support in the data collection.
- Abraham, A. (2012). The neuroscience of creativity: A promising or perilous enterprise? In D. A. P. Alejandre & M. M.-L. Garrido (Eds.), Creativity and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 15–24). Madrid: Fundación Tomás Pascual y Pilar Gómez-Cuétara.Google Scholar
- Abraham, A. (2013). The promises and perils of the neuroscience of creativity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(246), 1–9. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00246.
- Abraham, A., Werning, M., Rakoczy, H., von Cramon, D. Y., & Schubotz, R. I. (2008b). Minds, persons, and space: an fMRI investigation into the relational complexity of higher-order intentionality. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(2), 438–450. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Albrecht, K., Volz, K. G., Sutter, M., Laibson, D. I., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2011). What is for me is not for you: brain correlates of intertemporal choice for self and other. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(2), 218–225. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq046.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- De Frias, C. M., Nilsson, L.-G., & Herlitz, A. (2006). Sex differences in cognition are stable over a 10-year period in adulthood and old age. Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition. Section B, Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 13(3–4), 574–587. doi: 10.1080/13825580600678418.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ernst, M., Maheu, F. S., Schroth, E., Hardin, J., Golan, L. G., Cameron, J., et al. (2007). Amygdala function in adolescents with congenital adrenal hyperplasia: a model for the study of early steroid abnormalities. Neuropsychologia, 45(9), 2104–2113. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.01.019.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Friston, K.J., Holmes, A.P., Worsley, K.J., Poline, J.B., Frith, C., & Frackowiak, R.S. (1995). Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach. Human Brain Mapping, 2, 189–210.Google Scholar
- Lohmann, G., Muller, K., Bosch, V., Mentzel, H., Hessler, S., Chen, L., Zysset, S., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2001). LIPSIA - A new software system for the evaluation of functional magnetic resonance images of the human brain. Computerised Medical Imaging and Graphics, 25, 449–457.Google Scholar
- McCarthy, M. M., Arnold, A. P., Ball, G. F., Blaustein, J. D., & De Vries, G. J. (2012). Sex differences in the brain: the not so inconvenient truth. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 32(7), 2241–2247. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5372-11.2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Neumann, J., & Lohmann, G. (2003). Bayesian second-level analysis of functional magnetic resonance images. NeuroImage, 20(2), 1346–1355. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00443-9.
- Pagnani, A. R. (2011). Gender differences. In Editors-in-Chief: M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (second edition) (pp. 551–557). San Diego: Academic Press. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123750389001060
- Runco, M. A., Cramond, B., & Pagnani, A. R. (2010). Gender and creativity. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 343–357). New York: Springer. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/content/r193k8872152l51k/abstract/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spreng, R. N., Mar, R. A., & Kim, A. S. N. (2009). The common neural basis of autobiographical memory, prospection, navigation, theory of mind, and the default mode: a quantitative meta-analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(3), 489–510. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21029.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tewes, U. (1994). HAWIE-R. Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenztest fur Erwachsene, Revision 1991; Handbuch und Testanweisung. Gottingen: Verlag Hans Huber.Google Scholar
- Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
- Worsley, K.J., & Friston, K.J. (1995). Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited — Again. Neuroimage, 2, 173–181.Google Scholar