Examining network dynamics after traumatic brain injury using the extended unified SEM approach
The current study uses effective connectivity modeling to examine how individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) learn a new task. We make use of recent advancements in connectivity modeling (extended unified structural equation modeling, euSEM) and a novel iterative grouping procedure (Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation, GIMME) in order to examine network flexibility after injury. The study enrolled 12 individuals sustaining moderate and severe TBI to examine the influence of task practice on connections between 8 network nodes (bilateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate, inferior parietal lobule, and Crus I in the cerebellum). The data demonstrate alterations in networks from pre to post practice and differences in the models based upon distinct learning trajectories observed within the TBI sample. For example, better learning in the TBI sample was associated with diminished connectivity within frontal systems and increased frontal to parietal connectivity. These findings reveal the potential for using connectivity modeling and the euSEM to examine dynamic networks during task engagement and may ultimately be informative regarding when networks are moving in and out of periods of neural efficiency.
KeywordsfMRI TBI Brain injury Rehabilitation Working memory Cognitive control
We wish to thank Julia Slocomb and Jeffrey Vesek for their efforts in subject recruitment and MRI data acquisition. This work was funded in part by the New Jersey Comission for Brain Injury Research (09.001.BIR1).
- Albantakis, L., & Deco, G. (2011). Changes of mind in an attractor network of decision-making. PLoS Comput Biol, 7(6). doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002086
- Army Individual Test Battery:Manual of directions and scoring (1944). Washington, D.C.: War Department, Adjutant General’s Office.Google Scholar
- Baddeley, A., & Della Sala, S. (1996). Working memory and executive control. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci., 351(1346), 1397–1403; discussion 1403–1404. Review.Google Scholar
- Bergerbest, D., Ghahremani, D. G., Gabrieli, J. D. (2004). Neural correlates of auditory repetition priming: reduced fMRI activation in the auditory cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(6), 966–977.Google Scholar
- Braver, T. S., et al. (1997). A parametric study of prefrontal cortex involvement in human working memory. Neuroimage, 5(1), 49–62.Google Scholar
- Friston, K. (2009). Causal Modelling and Brain Connectivity in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. PLoS Biol, 7(2). doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000033
- Gates, K. M., Molenaar, P. C., Hillary, F. G., Ram, N., & Rovine, M. J. (2010). Automatic search for fMRI connectivity mapping: an alternative to Granger causality testing using formal equivalences among SEM path modeling, VAR, and unified SEM. NeuroImage, 50(3), 1118–1125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hillary, F. G., Genova, H. M., Medaglia, J. D., Fitzpatrick, N. M., Chiou, K. S., Wardecker, B. M., et al. (2010). The nature of processing speed deficits in traumatic brain injury: is less brain more? Brain Imaging and Behavior, 4(2), 141–154. doi: 10.1007/s11682-010-9094-z.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hillary, F., Medaglia, J. D., Gates, K., Molenaar, P., Slocomb, J., Peechatka, A., et al. (2011). Examining working memory task acquisition in a disrupted neural network. Brain, 134(Pt 5).Google Scholar
- Honma, M., Soshi, T., Kim, Y., & Kuriyama, K. (2010). Right prefrontal activity reflects the ability to overcome sleepiness during working memory tasks: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study. PLoS One. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012923.
- Jöreskog, K. G., Sörbom, D. (1992). LISREL. Scientific Software International, Inc.Google Scholar
- Katori, Y., Sakamoto, K., Saito, N., Tanji, J., Mushiake, H., & Aihara, K. (2011). Representational Switching by Dynamical Reorganization of Attractor Structure in a Network Model of the Prefrontal Cortex. PLoS Biol, 7(11). doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002266
- Maruishi, M., Miyatani, M., Nakao, T., & Muranaka, H. (2007). Compensatory cortical activation during performance of an attention task by patients with diffuse axonal injury: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 78(2), 168–173. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.097345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sanchez-Carrion, R., Vendrell Gomez, P., Junque, C., Fernandez-Espejo, D., Falcon, C., Bargallo, N., et al. (2008). Frontal hypoactivation on functional magnetic resonance imaging in working memory after severe diffuse traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurotrauma, 25(5), 15. doi: 10.1089/neu.2007.0417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Scheibel, R. S., Newsome, M. R., Steinberg, J. L., Pearson, D. A., Rauch, R. A., Mao, H., et al. (2007). Altered brain activation during cognitive control in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 21(1), 36–45. doi: 10.1177/1545968306294730.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sporns, O. (2011). Networks of the Brain (pp. 207–231). London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Turner, G. R., McIntosh, A. R., & Levine, B. (2011). Prefrontal compensatory engagement in TBI is due to altered functional engagement of existing networks and not functional reorganization. Frontal Systems Neuroscience, 24(5), 9.Google Scholar
- Wechsler, D. (1997). WAIS-III administration and scoring manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar