Advertisement

Species abundance distribution models of Toona ciliata communities in Hubei Province, China

  • Yang Wang
  • Huoming Zhou
  • Jingyong Cai
  • Congwen SongEmail author
  • Linzhao ShiEmail author
Original Paper
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

The study of plant species abundance distribution (SAD) in natural communities is of considerable importance to understand the processes and ecological rules of community assembly. With the distribution of tree, shrub and herb layers of eight natural communities of Toona ciliata as research targets, three different ecological niche models were used: broken stick model, overlapping niche model and niche preemption model, as well as three statistical models: log-series distribution model, log-normal distribution model and Weibull distribution model, to fit SAD of the different vegetation layers based on data collected. Goodness-of-fit was compared with Chi square test, Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K–S) test and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). The results show: (1) based on the criteria of the lowest AIC value, Chi square value and K–S value with no significant difference (p > 0.05) between theoretic and observed SADs. The suitability and goodness-of-fit of the broken stick model was the best of three ecological niche models. The log-series distribution model did not accept the fitted results of most vegetation layers and had the lowest goodness-of-fit. The Weibull distribution model had the best goodness-of-fit for SADs. Overall, the statistical SADs performed better than the ecological ones. (2) T. ciliata was the dominant species in all the communities; species richness and diversity of herbs were the highest of the vegetation layers, while the diversities of the tree layers were slightly higher than the shrub layers; there were fewer common species and more rare species in the eight communities. The herb layers had the highest community evenness, followed by the shrub and the tree layers. Due to the complexity and habitat diversity of the different T. ciliata communities, comprehensive analyses of a variety of SADs and tests for optimal models together with management, are practical steps to enhance understanding of ecological processes and mechanisms of T. ciliata communities, to detect disturbances, and to facilitate biodiversity and species conservation.

Keywords

Toona ciliata community Tree-shrub-herb layers Niche models Statistical models Species abundance distribution (SAD) Model fit 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank Prof. Zhongcheng Zhou, Mr. Yinshan Tan (Badong County Forestry Bureau) and numerous foresters from different forestry bureaus of Hubei Province for their support of our site surveys. We also express our sincere gratitude to the reviewers for their constructive criticisms.

References

  1. Ali A, Lin SL, He JK, Kong FM, Yu JH, Jiang HS (2019) Climate and soils determine aboveground biomass indirectly via species diversity and stand structural complexity in tropical forests. For Ecol Manag 432:823–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alroy J (2015) The shape of terrestrial abundance distributions. Sci Adv 1:e1500082PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bispo PDC, Balzter H, Malhi Y, Slik JWF, dos Santos JR, Rennoâ CD, Espírito-Santo FD, Aragão LEOC, Ximenes AC, Bispo BDC (2017) Drivers of metacommunity structure diverge for common and rare Amazonian tree species. PLoS ONE 12(11):e0188300PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borda-de-Água L, Borges PAV, Hubbell SP, Pereira HM (2012) Spatial scaling of species abundance distributions. Ecography 35:549–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campos PV, Villa PM, Nunes JA, Schaefer CEGR, Poremsbki S, Neri AV (2018) Plant diversity and community structure of Brazilian Páramos. J Mt Sci 15(6):1186–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chazdon RL (2017) Landscape restoration, natural regeneration, and the forests of the future. Ann Missouri Bot Garden 102(2):251–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng JJ, Mi XC, Ma KP, Zhang JT (2011) Responses of species–abundance distribution to varying sampling scales in a subtropical broad-leaved forest. Biodivers Sci 19(2):168–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fang XF, Yang QS, Liu HM, Ma ZP, Dong S, Cao Y, Yuan MJ, Fei XY, Sun XY, Wang XH (2016) Distribution of species abundance of evergreen and deciduous woody plants in the evergreen broad-leaved forests at Tiantong, Zhejiang. Biodivers Sci 24(6):629–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fattorini S, Rigal F, Cardoso P, Borges PAV (2016) Using species abundance distribution models and diversity indices for biogeographical analyses. Acta Oecol 70:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feng Y, Ma KM, Zhang YX, Qi J, Zhang JY (2007) Species abundance distribution of Quercus liaotungensis forest along altitudinal gradient in Dongling Mountain, Beijing. Acta Ecol Sin 27(11):4743–4750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fisher RA, Corbet AS, Williams CB (1943) The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of animal population. J Anim Ecol 12(1):42–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gao LX, Bi RC, Yan M (2011) Species abundance distribution patterns of Pinus tabulaeformis forest in Huoshan Mountain of Shanxi Province, China. Chin J Plant Ecol 35(12):1256–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guariguata MR, Ostertag R (2001) Neotropical secondary forest succession: changes in structural and functional characteristics. For Ecol Manag 148:185–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guo XY, Zhang JT, Gong HL, Zhang GL, Dong Z (2007) Species abundance patterns of artificial vegetation in Antaibao Open Mine. Sci Silvae Sin 43(3):118–121Google Scholar
  15. Holl KD (2017) Research directions in tropical forest restoration. Ann Missouri Bot Garden 102(2):237–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. In: Silvertown J, Amtonovics J (eds) Princeton monographs in population biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p p375Google Scholar
  17. Jiang MX, Jin YX, He JS, Chen WL, Shen ZH (1995) The effects of man-made disturbance on woody species of second growth of masson pine forest in Three-gorge region. Resour Environ Yangtze Valley 4(4):356–361Google Scholar
  18. Kaspari M (2001) Taxonomic level, trophic biology and the regulation of local abundance. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 10(3):229–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kempton RA (1979) Structure of species abundance and measurement of diversity. Biometrics 35:307–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kempton RA, Taylor LR (1974a) The Q-statistic and the diversity of floras. Nature 275:252–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kempton RA, Taylor LR (1974b) Log-series and log-normal parameters as diversity discriminants for the Lepidoptera. J Anim Ecol 43:381–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kraft NJB, Adler PB, Godoy O, James EC, Fuller S, Levine JM (2015) Community assembly, coexistence and the environmental filtering metaphor. Funct Ecol 29:592–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ma KP (1994) The measurement of biotic community diversity. In: Qian YQ, Ma KP (eds) Principles and methodsGoogle Scholar
  24. Ma KM (2003) Advances on the study on species abundance pattern. Acta Phytoecol Sin 27(3):412–426Google Scholar
  25. Ma KP, Liu CR, Yu SL, Wang W (1997) Plant community diversity in Dongling Mountain, Beijing, China III. Species-abundance relations of several types of forestry communities. Acta Phytoecol Sin 17(6):573–583Google Scholar
  26. MacArthur RH (1957) On the relative abundance of bird species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 43:293–295PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Magurran AE (1988) Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, pp 1–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity, 1st edn. Blackwell Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Magurran AE, Henderson PA (2003) Explaining the excess of rare species in natural species abundance distribution. Nature 422:714–716PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Matthews TJ, Whittaker RJ (2015) On the species abundance distribution in applied ecology and biodiversity Management. J Appl Ecol 52(2):443–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. May RM (1975) Patterns of species abundance and diversity. In: Coddy ML, Diamona JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Belknap Press of Harvard University, Cambridge, pp 81–120Google Scholar
  32. McGill BJ (2010) Species abundance distributions. In: Magurran AE, McGill BJ (eds) Biological diversity: frontiers in measurement and assessment. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. McGill BJ, Etienne RS, Gray JS, Alonso D, Anderson MJ, Benecha HK, Dornelas M, Enquist BJ, Green JL, He F, Hurlbert AH, Magurran AE, Marquet PA, Maurer BA, Ostling A, Soykan CU, Ugland KI, White EP (2007) Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. Ecol Lett 10(1):995–1015PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meiners SJ, Cadotte MW, Fridley JD, Pickett STA, Walker LR (2015) Is successional research nearing its climax? New approaches for understanding dynamic communities. Funct Ecol 29(2):154–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Motonura I (1932) On the statistical treatment of communities. Zool Mag (Tokyo) 44:379–383Google Scholar
  36. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2019) Vegan: community ecology package: ordination methods, diversity analysis and other functions for community and vegetation ecologists. R Package Version 2:5–6Google Scholar
  37. Peng SL, Yin ZY, Reng H, Guo QF (2003) Advances in research on the species-abundance relationship models in multi-species collection. Acta Ecol Sin 23(8):1590–1605Google Scholar
  38. Pielou EC (1975) Ecological diversity. Wiley, New York, pp 21–23Google Scholar
  39. Poorter L, van der Sande M, Arets AJMM, Ascarrunz N, Enquist B, Finegan B, Licona JC, Martínez-Ramos M, Lucas Mazzei L, Meave JA, Mũnoz R, Nytch CJ, de Oliveira NAA, Perez-García EA, Prado-Junior J, Rodríguez-Velazques J, Ademir Roberto Ruschel AR, Salgado-Negret B, Schiavini I, Swenson NG, Tenorio EA, Thompson J, Toledo M, Uriarte M, der Hout PV, Zimmerman JK, Peña-Claros M (2017) Biodiversity and climate determine the functioning of Neotropical forests. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 26(12):1423–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Preston FW (1948) The commonness, and rarity, of species. Ecology 29(3):254–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Qin L (2009) Statistical ecology. China Forestry Press, Beijing, pp 71–72Google Scholar
  42. Qin L, Wen YG, Luo YH, Tan L (2009) Weibull model of species abundance distribution of Huodendron biaristatum community in Damingshan Nature Reserve. Guihaia 29(1):116–119Google Scholar
  43. Reng P, Wang X, Guo H (2009) Species abundance distribution pattern of forestry communities on loess plateau. Chin J Ecol 28(8):1449–1455Google Scholar
  44. Spitale D (2012) A comparative study of common and rare species in spring habitats. Ecoscience 19(1):80–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tabarelli M, Aguiar AV, Girão LC, Peres CA, Lopes AV (2010) Effects of pioneer tree species hyper-abundance on forest fragments in Northeastern Brazil. Conserv Biol 24(6):1654–1663PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Tokeshi M (1993) Species abundance patterns and community structure. Adv Ecol Res 24:112–186Google Scholar
  47. Ulrich W, Soliveresb S, Thomas AD, Dougilld AJ, Maestre FT (2016) Environmental correlates of species rank-abundance distributions in global drylands. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 20:56–64PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Villa PM, Cardinelli LDS, Magnago LF, Heringer G, Martins SV, Campos PV, Rodrigues AC, Neri AV, Meira-Neto JAA (2018a) Relación especie-área y distribución de la abundancia de especies en una comunidad vegetal de un inselberg tropical: efecto del tamaño de los parches. Rev Biol Trop 66(2):937–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Villa PM, Martins SV, Oliveira Neto SN, Rodrigues AC, Martorano L, Delgado L, Cancio NM, Gastauer M (2018b) Intensification of shifting cultivation reduces forest resilience in the northern Amazon. For Ecol Manag 430:312–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Villa PM, Martins SV, Rodrigues AC, Safar NVH, Bonilla MAC, Ali A (2019) Testing species abundance distribution models in tropical forest successions: implications for fine-scale passive restoration. Ecol Eng 135:28–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang Y, Leng YZ, Su CJ, Song CW, Cheng DH, Cao YN, Zhang M, Fu CL (2016a) Spatial structure and distribution pattern of natural Toona ciliata populations in the Enshi Region. J Zhejiang A&F Univ 33(1):17–25Google Scholar
  52. Wang Y, Yan KX, Teng JX, Chen WX, Wang LB, Chen S (2016b) Analysis on natural population dynamics of endangered species Toona ciliata in northwestern Hubei. J Plant Resour Environ 25(3):96–102Google Scholar
  53. Whittaker RH (1972) Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon 21:213–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wu CZ, Hong W (1997) Study on Weibull MODEL FOR SPECIES ABUNDANCE DISTRIBUTION Of Tsoongiodendron odorum forest. J Fujian Coll For 17(1):20–24Google Scholar
  55. Wu CZ, Hong W, Zheng QR (2001) Application of various patterns to the study on species relative abundance of Tsoongiodendron odorum community. J Trop Subtrop Bot 9(3):235–242Google Scholar
  56. Wu CZ, Hong W, Yan SJ, Yan LR, Wu JL (2004) Study on species abundance distribution model of the rare and endangered plant Tsuga longibracteata community. Chin J Eco-Agric 12(4):167–169Google Scholar
  57. Xie JY, Chen LZ (1997) The studies of some aspects of biodiversity on scrubs in the warm temperate zone in China. Acta PhytoEcol Sin 21(3):197–207Google Scholar
  58. Xu GJ, Lin KM, Xu N, Wu PP, Zhu H, Li M (2018) Species connection of main tree species at tree layer of old-growth Chinese fir forest with near natural management. Journal of Forest and Environment 38(4):385–392 in Chinese with English abstract Google Scholar
  59. Yin ZY, Liao WB (1999) Studies on log-normal distribution patterns of species abundance of south subtropical forest community, China. Guihaia 19(3):221–224Google Scholar
  60. Yu YF (1999) The milestone of China’s wild plants conservation-the issue of national key protected wild plants (Directory One). Plants 4:3–11Google Scholar
  61. Zermeño-Hernández I, Méndez-Toribio M, Siebe C, Benítez-Malvido J, Martínez-Ramos M (2015) Ecological disturbance regimes caused by agricultural land uses and their effects on tropical forest regeneration. Appl Veg Sci 18(3):443–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhang JT (1995) Quantitative vegetation ecology. Beijing Science and Technology Press, Beijing, pp p44–p76Google Scholar
  63. Zhang JT (1999) Species abundance patterns in some broad-leaved deciduous forests in New York, USA. Acta Phytoecol Sin 23(6):481–489Google Scholar
  64. Zhang S, Lin F, Yuan ZQ, Kuang X, Jia SH, Wang YY, Suo YY, Fang S, Wang XG, Ye J, Hao ZQ (2015) Herb layer species abundance distribution patterns in different seasons in an old-growth temperate forest in Changbai Mountain, China. Biodivers Sci 23(5):641–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zheng DG, Liu LP, Gao WY, Cai JY, Chen WX (2019) Research on α diversity of natural Toona ciliata community of Northwest Hubei. J Hunan Ecol Sci 6(1):21–25Google Scholar
  66. Zhong X, Zhang M, Yin X, Cai JY, Wang Y (2018) Species abundance distribution of natural Toona ciliata community in Yesanguan of Badong County. For Inven Plann 43(3):63–67Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hubei Ecology Polytechnic CollegeWuhanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations