Advertisement

A basal area increment model for individual trees in mixed continuous cover forests in Iranian Caspian forests

  • Nishtman Hatami
  • Peter Lohmander
  • Mohammad Hadi Moayeri
  • Soleiman Mohammadi Limaei
Original Paper
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop and test a new basal area growth model in mixed species continuous cover forests in northern Iran. We analyzed 421 core samples from 6 main species in the forest area to develop our growth model. In each plot, we measured variables such as total tree height (m), diameter at breast height (DBH) (cm) and basal area of larger trees as cumulative basal areas of trees (GCUM) of DBH > 5 cm. The empirical data were analyzed using regression analysis. There was a statistically significant nonlinear function between the annual basal area increment, as the dependent variable, and the basal area of the individual trees and competition as explanatory variables. Reference area from the largest trees, was circular plot with area of 0.1 ha. GCUM was estimated for trees of DBH > 5 cm. Furthermore, we investigated the dependencies of diameter growth of different species on stand density at different levels of competition, and diameter development of individual trees through time. The results indicate that competition caused by larger neighborhood trees has a negative effect on growth. In addition, the maximum diameter increment is affected by competition level. Therefore, the maximum diameter increment of species occurs when the trees are about 35–40 cm in dense-forest (40 to 0 m2 per ha) and when the trees are about 60 to 70 cm in very dense forest (60 to 0 m2 per ha) which is more likely to Caspian natural forests with high level density due to uneven-aged composition of stands.

Keywords

Individual-tree model Iranian Caspian forests Continuous cover forestry Mixed stands Uneven-aged management 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Ministry of Science, Research and Technology of Iran for the scholarship to Nishtman Hatami to take a short time study in Sweden, which made it possible to perform this joint research in Umea, Sweden.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bayat M, Pukkala T, Namiranian M, Zobeiri M (2013) Productivity and optimal management of the uneven-aged hardwood forests of Hyrcania. Eur J For Res 132(5–6):851–864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Botkin DB (1993) Forest dynamics: an ecological model. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 309Google Scholar
  3. Burkhart HE (1990) Status and future of growth and yield models. In: Proceedings of a symposium on state-of the art methodology of forest inventory. USDA for Serv Gen Tech Rep. PNW GTR-263, pp 409–414Google Scholar
  4. Cannell MGR, Rothery P, Ford ED (1984) Competition within stands of Picea sitchensis and Pinus contorta. J Ann Bot 53(3):349–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Delfan Abazari B, Saghebtalebi Kh (2007) Diameter and height increment process of oriental beech (Fagus orientalis) in natural Caspian forest, Kelardasht region. J For Poplar Res 15(4):320–328Google Scholar
  6. Ek AR, Monserud RA (1974) FOREST: a computer model for simulating the growth and reproduction of mixed species forest stands. University of Wisconsin, Research Papers R2635, p 13Google Scholar
  7. Heshmatol Vaezin SM, Attarod P, Bayramzadeh V (2008) Tree volume increment models of broadleaf species in the uneven-aged mixed Caspian forests. Asian J Plant Sci 7(8):700–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kuehne C, Kublin E, Pyttel P, Bauhus J (2013) Growth and form of Quercus robur and Fraxinus excelsior respond distinctly different to initial growing space: results from 24-year-old Nelder experiments. J For Res 24(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lhotka JM (2017) Examining growth relationships in Quercus stands: an application of individual-tree models developed from long-term thinning experiments. For Ecol Manag 385:65–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lohmander P (2017) A general dynamic function for the basal area of individual trees derived from a production theoretically motivated autonomous differential equation. Iran J Manag Stud 10(4):917–928Google Scholar
  11. Lohmander P, Mohammadi Limaei S, Olsson L, Mohammadi Z (2017) Optimal forest management based on growth data from the Iranian Caspian forests. In: 9th International Iranian optimal research conference (IORC), Babolsar, IranGoogle Scholar
  12. Mohammadi Z, Mohammadi Limaei S, Lohmander P, Olsson L (2017) Estimation of a basal area growth model for individual trees in uneven-aged Caspian mixed species forests. J For Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-017-0556-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mohammed HM, Heinz R (2011) Studying the competition in natural stands of Acacia seyal Del. variety seyal. Institute of Forest Growth and Computer Sciences, TU-Dresden, Pienner Str. For Ideas 17(41):35–43Google Scholar
  14. Namiranian M (2010) Tree measurement and forest bio inventory. University of Tehran Press, Tehran, p 574Google Scholar
  15. Øyen BH, Nilsen P, Bøhler F, Andreassen K (2011) Predicting individual tree and stand diameter increment responses of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) after mountain forest selective cutting. For Stud 55(1):33–45Google Scholar
  16. Parsakhoo A, Mostafa M, Shataee SH, Lotfalian M (2017) Decision support system to find a skid trail network for extracting marked trees. J For Sci 63(2):62–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Peng CG (2000) Growth and yield models for uneven-aged stands: past, present and future. For Ecol Manag 132(1–3):259–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pienaar LV, Shiver BD (1984) An analysis and models of basal area growth in 45-year-old unthinned and thinned slash pine plantation plots. For Sci 30:933–942Google Scholar
  19. Pienaar LV, Shiver BD, Grider GE (1985) Predicting basal area growth in thinned slash pine plantation. For Sci 31(3):731–741Google Scholar
  20. Pokharel B, Dech JP (2012) Mixed-effects basal area increment models for tree species in the boreal forest of ontario, canada using an ecological land classification approach to incorporate site effects. J For 85(2):255–270Google Scholar
  21. Pukkala T, Lahde E, Laiho O (2009) Growth and yield models for uneven-sized forest stands in Finland. For Ecol Manag 258(3):207–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schütz JP (2006) Modelling the demographic sustainability of pure beech plenter forests in Eastern Germany. Ann For Sci 63:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shugart HH, Smith TM (1996) A review of forest path models and their application to global change research. Clim Change 34:131–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vanclay JK (1994) Modelling forest growth and yield: applications to mixed tropical forests. CAB International, Wallingford, p 330Google Scholar
  25. Wykoff WR (1990) A basal area increment model for individual conifers in the northern Rocky Mountains. For Sci 36(4):1077–1104Google Scholar
  26. Wykoff WR, Crookston NL, Stage AR (1982) User’s guide to Stand Prognosis Model, USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report [NT-133] Ogden, UtahGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang J, Huang SM, He FL (2014) Half-century evidence from western Canada shows forest dynamics are primarily driven by competition followed by climate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(13):4009–4014CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nishtman Hatami
    • 1
  • Peter Lohmander
    • 2
  • Mohammad Hadi Moayeri
    • 1
  • Soleiman Mohammadi Limaei
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural ResourcesGorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural ResourcesGorganIran
  2. 2.Optimal Solutions in Cooperation with Linnaeus UniversityVäxjöSweden
  3. 3.Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural ResourcesUniversity of GuilanSowmeh SaraIran

Personalised recommendations