Advertisement

Fractal features and infiltration characteristics of the soil from different land uses in a small watershed in a rocky, mountainous area in Shandong Province

  • Lei Wang
  • Rui Yang
  • Shuyong Zhang
  • Guangcan Zhang
  • Xia Liu
Original Paper
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

We studied infiltration and fractal mechanisms on sloping farmlands in a small watershed in Shandong Province in the rocky mountain areas of northern China. We studied soil fraction and soil water retention curves, and developed a soil infiltration model to analyze its quantitative relationship with soil particle size and pore dimensions under four types of land use, including sloping farmland, abandoned land, natural forest, and forest plantation (Malus pumila, Crataegus pinnatifida). Soil stability infiltration rate ranked as sloping farmland > abandoned land > natural forest > forest plantation. The sequence of soil particle size and pore dimension ranked as natural forest > forest plantation > abandoned land > sloping farmland. There were significant positive correlations between soil particle size and pore dimension, and both were positively correlated with the percent volume of silt and clay. They were negatively correlated with soil infiltration rate. The Horton model and the power function model were more suitable for simulating soil infiltration and the infiltration rate. We concluded that the soil in this area displayed typical fragments of rocky mountainous regions due to the loss of silt and clay caused by cultivation on sloping farmland. The uniformity and fractal dimensions of soil particle sizes and pore distribution decreased, thereby enhancing soil infiltration capacity and decreasing soil water retention capacity.

Keywords

Soil structure Soil infiltration Fractal dimension Sloping farmland Rocky mountainous area 

References

  1. Alaba B, Chandra AM (2016) Independent principal component analysis for simulation of soil water content and bulk density in a Canadian Watershed. Internat Soil Water Conserv Res 4(3):151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreola F, Castellini E, Ferreira JMF, Olhero S, Romagnoli M (2006) Effect of sodium hexametaphosphate and ageing on the rheological behavior of kaolin dispersions. Appl Clay Sci 31(1–2):56–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagarello V, Castellini M, Prima SD, Iovino M (2014) Soil hydraulic properties determined by infiltration experiment sand different heights of water pouring. Geoderma 213(1):492–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartoli F, Philippy R, Doirisse M, Niquet S, Dubuit M (2010) Structure and self-similarity in silty and sandy soils: the fractal approach. Eur J Soil Sci 42(2):167–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartolo SD, Fallico C, Severino G, Veltri M (2014) Two fractal regimes of the soil hydraulic properties. Appl Math 5(12):1773–1779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boluwade A, Madramootoo CA (2016) Independent principal component analysis for simulation of soil water content and bulk density in a Canadian watershed. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 4(3):151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooks KN, Ffolliott PF, Gregersen HM, Thames JL (2013) Hydrology and the management of watersheds, vol 73, number 20. Wiley, p 227Google Scholar
  8. Cerda A (2010) Effects of rock fragment cover on soil infiltration, interrill runoff and erosion. Eur J Soil Sci 52(1):59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chandrakant LJ, Milind PR (2015) An investigational approach for the modelling of infiltration process in a clay soil. KSCE J Civil Eng 19(6):1916–1921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen Y, Zhang KL, Luo LF (2005) Study on beginning infiltration law of the being wild soil in loess plateau. J Sediment Study 5:45–50Google Scholar
  11. Chen XX, Tang L, Zhang YJ (2009) Pattern and development of soil erosion in Zibo. Shandong Water Resour Z2:48–49 + 52Google Scholar
  12. Cheruy F, Campoy A, Dupont JC, Ducharne A, Hourdin F (2013) Combined influence of atmospheric physics and soil hydrology on the simulated meteorology at the SIRTA atmospheric observatory. Clim Dyn 40(9–10):2251–2269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Comino JR, Sinoga JDR, González JMS, Guerra-Merchán A, Seeger M (2016) High variability of soil erosion and hydrological processes in Mediterranean hillslope vineyards (Montes de Málaga, Spain). CATENA 145:274–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dong SX (2004) Effect of natural vegetation restoration on soil infiltration in slope farmland of loess hilly and gully region. Bull Soil Water Conserv 24(4):1–5Google Scholar
  15. Dong L, Zheng F (2009) Fractal characteristics of soil particles in the hilly-gully regions of the loess plateau, north of Shanxi, China. J Soil Water Conserv 7(2):35–41Google Scholar
  16. Feng LL, Pang JL (2009) Fractal character of soil void in artificial chinese prickly ash forest in eastern Guanzhong area. Guizhou Agric Sci 37(4):130–132Google Scholar
  17. Filgueira RR, Fournier LL, Cerisola CI, Gelati P, García MG (2006) Particle-size distribution in soils: a critical study of the fractal model validation. Geoderma 134(3–4):327–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. García-Díaz A, Bienes R, Sastre B et al (2017) Nitrogen losses in vineyards under different types of soil groundcover. A field runoff simulator approach in central Spain. Agric Ecosyst Environ 236:256–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Globus AM (2006) Fractal character of some physical parameters of soils. Eurasian Soil Sci 39(10):1116–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Herrada MA, Gutiérrez-Martin A, Montanero JM (2014) Modeling infiltration rates in a saturated/unsaturated soil under the free draining condition. J Hydrol 515(515):10–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huang GH, Zhan WH (2002) Modeling soil water retention curve with fractal theory. Adv Water Sci 13(1):55–60Google Scholar
  22. Jejurkar CL, Rajurkar MP (2015) An investigational approach for the modelling of infiltration process in a clay soil. KSCE J Civ Eng 19(6):1916–1921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jiang N, Shao MA, Lei TW (2005) Fractal dimension and spatial variability of soil water infiltration properties on natural slope in a water-wind erosion interlaced region. Acta Pedol Sin 6:17–20Google Scholar
  24. Jomaa S, Barry DA, Heng BCP, Brovelli A, Sander GC (2013) Effect of antecedent conditions and fixed rock fragment coverage on soil erosion dynamics through multiple rainfall events. J Hydrol 484(7):115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lin DY (2002) Soil science. China Forestry Press, Beijing, pp 57–67, 355–357Google Scholar
  26. Martínez-Hernández C, Rodrigo-Comino J (2017) Impact of lithology and soil properties on abandoned dryland terraces during the early stages of soil erosion by water in Southeast Spain. Hydrol Process 31(17):3095–3109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mirzaee S, Zolfaghari AA, Gorji M, Dyck M, Dashtaki SG (2014) Evaluation of infiltration models with different numbers of fitting parameters in different soil texture classes. Arch Agron Soil Sci 60(5):681–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mousavi SB (2015) Employment of Pedo-transfer functions for predicting initial and final infiltration rates using Horton model and soil readily available characteristics. Indian J Agric Sci Res 49(4):333Google Scholar
  29. Nearing MA, Yin SQ, Borrelli P, Polyakov V (2017) Rainfall erosivity: an historical review. CATENA 157:357–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Panagos P, Borrelli P, Meusburger K, Yu B, Klik A (2017) Global rainfall erosivity assessment based on high-temporal resolution rainfall records. Sci Rep UK 7(1):4175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peng N, Xie XL, Wang KF, Wang KR (2006) Study on rainfall infiltration, runoff and soil water redistribution on sloping lands of red soil. J Soil Water Conserv 20(3):17–20Google Scholar
  32. Rieu M, Sposito G (1991a) Fractal fragmentation, soil porosity and soil water properties: I. Theory. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:1231–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rieu M, Sposito G (1991b) Fractal fragmentation, soil porosity and soil water properties: II. Applications. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:1239–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sayah B, Gilrodríguez M, Juana L (2016) Development of one-dimensional solutions for water infiltration. Analysis and parameters estimation. J Hydrol 535:226–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tao GL, Zhang JR (2009) Two categories of fractal models of rock and soil expressing volume and size-distribution of pores and grains. Chin Sci Bull 54(23):4458–4467Google Scholar
  36. Tao GL, Hu QZ, Pan MY, Hu X (2012) The density functions of pore-size and particle-size distribution established by using fractal theory and their applications. Appl Mech Mater 170–173:148–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thierfelder C, Wall PC (2009) Effects of conservation agriculture techniques on infiltration and soil water content in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Soil Tillage Res 105(2):217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Twarakavi NKC, Šimůnek J, Schaap MG (2010) Can texture-based classification optimally classify soils with respect to soil hydraulics? Water Resour Res 46(46):658–668Google Scholar
  39. Tyler SW, Wheatcraft SW (1990) Fractal processes in soil water relation. Water Resour Res 26(5):1047–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Veit F, Aßmann M, Bayer M, Löffler A, Höfling S (2014) Formula deduction and numerical solution of infiltration and runoff equation on loessial hillslope. J Irrig Drain E-ASCE 8260(3):282Google Scholar
  41. Wang Y, Wang Y (2007) Impacts of fractal features of soil on moisture infiltration capacity of typical stands in Jinyun mountain of Chongqing city. Front For China 2(1):72–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yan SC, Chen XT, Chen GP, Ye YF (2013) Experimental study for irregular wave uplift force on upper-structure of offshore high-piled wharf under wave-current interaction. Appl Mech Mater 353–356:2705–2714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yao HM, Zheng QY, Zheng YT (2008) Present condition and protection counter measures of cultivated land in Yiyuan country. Land Resour Shandong Prov 24(7/8):116–118Google Scholar
  44. Yu DM, Hu XL, Zhang GC et al (2011) Multifractal analysis on soil particle size distribution for different vegetation types in Jiangzihe small watershed. Sci Soil Water Conserv 9(5):79–85Google Scholar
  45. Zhan HX, Zhang GC, Liu X et al (2009) Fractal features of soil particle size distribution and infiltration characteristics under different vegetation communities in the forestland of Yimeng mountains area. Sci Soil Water Conserv 7(1):49–56Google Scholar
  46. Zhang HJ (2006) Principles of soil erosion. China Forestry Press, Beijing, pp 62–63Google Scholar
  47. Zolfaghari AA, Taghizadehmehrjardi R, Asadzadeh F, Hajabbasi MA (2016) Soil structure changes due to different land-use practices in the central Zagruos region, Iran. Arch Agron Soil Sci 62(2):163–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Ecological RestorationShandong Agricultural UniversityTaianPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Restoration, Collaborative Innovation Center of Sustainable Forestry in Southern China of Jiangsu ProvinceForestry College of Nanjing Forestry UniversityNanjingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations