Advertisement

Axial compressive behavior of Moso Bamboo and its components with respect to fiber-reinforced composite structure

  • Xuexia Zhang
  • Zixuan Yu
  • Yan Yu
  • Hankun Wang
  • Jinghao Li
Original Paper
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Bamboo is a unique fiber-reinforced bio-composite with fibers embedded into a parenchyma cell matrix. We conducted axial compression tests on bamboo blocks prepared from bottom to top, and from inner to outer portions of the culm. The apparent Young’s modulus and compressive strength of whole thickness bamboo blocks exhibited slight increases with increasing height along the culm, due to slight increases of fiber volume fraction (Vf) from 28.4 to 30.4%. Other blocks showed a significant increase in apparent Young’s modulus and strength from the inner to outer part of the culm wall, mainly owing to a sharp increase of Vf from 17.1 to 59.8%. With a decrease of fiber fraction volume there was a transition from relatively brittle behavior to very ductile behavior in bamboo blocks. Results indicated that stiffness and strength of bamboo was primarily due to fiber in compression, and ductility of bamboo was provided by the parenchyma cell matrix acting as a natural fiber-reinforced composite.

Keywords

Bamboo Axial compressive behavior Functionally grade structure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Basic Scientific Research Funds of International Center for Bamboo and Rattan (1632016007) and the National Science Foundation of China (31400519) for their financial support for this research.

References

  1. Ahmad M, Kamke FA (2005) Analysis of calcutta bamboo for structural composite materials: physical and mechanical properties. Wood Sci Technol 39(6):448–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amada S, Ichikawa Y, Munekata T, Nagase Y, Shimizu H (1997) Fiber texture and mechanical graded structure of bamboo. Compos Part B Eng 28(1):13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baets J, Wouters K, Hendrickx K, Vuure AWV (2015) Compressive properties of natural fibre composites. Mater Lett 149:138–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chung KF, Yu WK (2002) Mechanical properties of structural bamboo for bamboo scaffoldings. Eng Struct 24(4):429–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dixon PG, Gibson LJ (2014) The structure and mechanics of moso bamboo material. J R Soc Interface 11(99):20140321CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Ghavami K, Rodrigues CS, Paciornik S (2003) Bamboo: functionally graded composite material. Asian J Civ Eng 4(4):1–10Google Scholar
  7. Habibi MK, Samaei AT, Gheshlaghi B, Jian L, Yang L (2015) Asymmetric flexural behavior from bamboo’s functionally graded hierarchical structure: underlying mechanisms. Acta Biomater 16:178–186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Huang DS, Zhou AP, Li HT, Su Y, Chen G (2012) Experimental study on the tensile properties of bamboo related to its distribution of vascular bundles. Key Eng Mater 517:112–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang P, Chang WS, Ansell MP, Chew YMJ, Shea A (2015) Density distribution profile for internodes and nodes of phyllostachys edulis (moso bamboo) by computer tomography scanning. Constr Build Mater 93:197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Krause JQ, Silva FDA, Ghavami K, Gomes ODFM, Filho RDT (2016) On the influence of dendrocalamus giganteus, bamboo microstructure on its mechanical behavior. Constr Build Mater 127:199–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li HT, Zhang QS, Huang DS, Deekz AJ (2013) Compressive performance of laminated bamboo. Compos Part B Eng 54(1):319–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu H, Wang X, Zhang X, Sun Z, Jiang Z (2016) In situ detection of the fracture behaviour of moso bamboo (phyllostachys pubescens) by scanning electron microscopy. Holzforschung 70:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lo TY, Cui HZ, Leung HC (2004) The effect of fiber density on strength capacity of bamboo. Mater Lett 58(21):2595–2598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lo TY, Cui HZ, Tang PWC, Leung HC (2008) Strength analysis of bamboo by microscopic investigation of bamboo fibre. Constr Build Mater 22(7):1532–1535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nogata F, Takahashi H (1995) Intelligent functionally graded material: bamboo. Compos Eng 5(7):743–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Obataya E, Kitin P, Yamauchi H (2007) Bending characteristics of bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) with respect to its fiber foam composite structure. Wood Sci Technol 41:385–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Qi J, Xie J, Yu W, Chen S (2015) Effects of characteristic inhomogeneity of bamboo culm nodes on mechanical properties of bamboo fiber reinforced composite. J Forestry Res 26(4):1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ray AK, Mondal S, Das SK, Ramachandrarao P (2005) Bamboo—a functionally graded composite-correlation between microstructure and mechanical strength. J Mater Sci 40(19):5249–5253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shang L, Sun Z, Liu X, Jiang Z (2015) A novel method for measuring mechanical properties of vascular bundles in moso bamboo. J Wood Sci 61(6):562–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shao ZP, Fang CH, Tian GL (2009) Mode I interlaminar fracture property of moso bamboo (phyllostachys pubescens). Wood Sci Technol 43(5):527–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shao ZP, Fang CH, Huang SX (2010) Tensile properties of moso bamboo (phyllostachys pubescens) and its components with respect to its fiber-reinforced composite structure. Wood Sci Technol 44(4):655–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Silva ECN, Walters MC, Paulino GH (2006) Modeling bamboo as a functionally graded material: lessons for the analysis of affordable materials. J Mater Sci 41(21):6991–7004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tan T, Rahbar N, Allameh SM, Kwofie S, Dissmore D, Ghavami K, Soboyejo WO (2011) Mechanical properties of functionally graded hierarchical bamboo structures. Acta Biomater 7(10):3796–3803CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Verma CS, Chariar VM (2013) Stiffness and strength analysis of four layered laminate bamboo composite at macroscopic scale. Compos Part B Eng 45(1):369–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Verma CS, Sharma NK, Chariar VM, Maheshwari S, Hada MK (2014) Comparative study of mechanical properties of bamboo laminae and their laminates with woods and wood based composites. Compos Part B Eng 60(2):523–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang X, Ren H, Zhang B, Fei B, Burgert I (2012) Cell wall structure and formation of maturing fibres of moso bamboo (phyllostachys pubescens) increase buckling resistance. J R Soc Interface 9(70):988–996CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang H, Li W, Ren D, Yu Z, Yu Y (2014) A two-variable model for predicting the effects of moisture content and density on compressive strength parallel to the grain for moso bamboo. J Wood Sci 60(5):362–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wegst UG (2011) Bending efficiency through property gradients in bamboo, palm, and wood-based composites. J Mechl Behav Biomed 4(5):744–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Xiao Y, Li L, Yang R, Shan B, She L (2013) Experimental study on creep and loading property of laminated bamboo bridge. Build Struc 43(18):86–91Google Scholar
  30. Xu Q, Harries K, Li X, Liu Q, Gottron J (2014) Mechanical properties of structural bamboo following immersion in water. Eng Struct 81:230–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang X, Li J, Yu Z, Yu Y, Wang H (2017) Compressive failure mechanism and buckling analysis of the graded hierarchical bamboo structure. J Mater Sci 52(12):6999–7007CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiomaterialsInternational Center for Bamboo and RattanBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.SFA and Beijing Co-built Key Laboratory of Bamboo and Rattan Science and TechnologyState Forestry AdministrationBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Forest Products LaboratoryU.S. Forest ServiceWisconsinUSA

Personalised recommendations