The influence of land use change on the spatial–temporal variability of habitat quality between 1990 and 2010 in Northeast China

Journal of Forestry Research volume 30, pages2227–2236(2019)Cite this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Land use changes are a direct consequence of interactions between humans and nature. Analysing the spatial and temporal changes in habitat quality brought about by land use change can provide a scientific basis for ecological protection and land planning. Based on the analysis of land use change from 1990 to 2010 in Northeast China, we used the InVEST (integrated valuation of ecosystem services and trade-offs) module to evaluate habitat quality based on watershed subdivision. The results show that: (1) the main land use changes from 1990 to 2010 were the transition from grasslands and forest lands to agricultural lands, which led to a decrease in connectivity of landscape and an increase in fragmentation; (2) areas of high habitat quality were distributed north of the Greater Khingan Mountains, the region of the Lesser Khingan Mountains and east of the Changbai Mountains, while the central plain had low habitat quality; (3) agricultural lands had the largest effect on habitat degradation among all habitat threats. During these 2 decades, the contribution of agricultural lands to habitat degradation were 43.4% in 1990, 44.6% in 2000 and 43.9% in 2010; and, (4) at a landscape scale, patch density and splitting index present noticeable negative correlations with habitat quality index. Habitat quality was significantly affected by landscape fragmentation and decreased connectivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Anonymous (2002) People’s Republic of China National Report on Sustainable Development (in Chinese). China Environmental Science Press, Beijing

  2. Baral H, Keenan RJ, Sharma SK, Stork NE, Kasel S (2014) Spatial assessment and mapping of biodiversity and conservation priorities in a heavily modified and fragmented production landscape in north-central Victoria, Australia. Ecol Indic 36:552–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boswell GP, Britton NF, Franks NR (1998) Habitat fragmentation, percolation theory and the conservation of a keystone species. Proc R Soc B 265(1409):1921–1925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burkey TV (1999) Extinction in fragmented habitats predicted from stochastic birth–death processes with density dependence. J Theor Biol 199(4):395–406

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B, Strien AV, Scharlemann JPW, Almond REA, Baillie JEM, Bomhard B, Brown C, Bruno J, Carpenter KE, Carr GM, Chanson J, Chenery AM, Csirke J, Davidson NC, Dentener F, Foster M, Galli A, Galloway JN, Genovesi P, Gregory RD, Hockings M, Kapos V, Lamarque JF, Leverington F, Loh J, McGeoch MA, McRae L, Minasyan A, Morcillo MH, Oldfield TEE, Pauly D, Quader S, Revenga C, Sauer JR, Skolnik B, Spear D, Stanwell-Smith D, Stuart SN, Symes A, Tierney M, Tyrrell TD, Vie JC, Watson R (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328(5982):1164–1168

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen Y, Qiao F, Jiang L (2016) Effects of land use pattern change on regional scale habitat quality based on InVEST model: a case study in Beijing. J Peking Univ 52(3):553–562

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duffy JE (2009) Why biodiversity is important to the functioning of real-world ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 7(8):437–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fahrig L (2002) Effect of habitat fragmentation on the extinction threshold: a synthesis. Ecol Appl 12(2):346–353

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34(1):487–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB, Manning AD (2006) Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and resilience: ten guiding principles for commodity production landscapes. Front Ecol Environ 4(2):80–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kareiva P (2011) Natural capital: theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kong LQ, Zhang L, Zheng H, Xu WH, Xiao Y, Ouyang ZY (2018) Driving forces behind ecosystem spatial changes in the Yangtze River Basin. Acta Ecol Sin 38(3):741–749

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leh MDK, Matlock MD, Cummings EC, Nalley LL (2013) Quantifying and mapping multiple ecosystem services change in West Africa. Agric Ecosyst Environ 165:6–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu JY, Kuang WH, Zhang ZX, Xu XL, Qin YW, Ning J, Zhou WC, Zhang SW, Li RD, Yan CZ, Wu SX, Shi XZ, Jiang N, Yu DS, Pan XZ, Chi WF (2014) Spatiotemporal characteristics, patterns and causes of land use changes in China since the late 1980s. Acta Geogr Sin 69(1):3–14

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liu ZF, Tang LN, Qiu QY, Xiao LS, Yang L, Xu T (2017) Temporal and spatial changes in habitat quality based on land-use change in Fujian Province. Acta Ecol Sin 37(13):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  16. Munro NT, Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J (2007) Faunal response to revegetation in agricultural areas of Australia: a review. Ecol Manag Restor 8(3):199–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron DR, Chan KMA, Daily GC, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Lonsdorf E, Naidoo R, Ricketts TH, Shaw M (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7(1):4–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Newell GR, White MD, Griffioen P, Conroy M (2006) Vegetation condition mapping at a landscape-scale across Victoria. Ecol Manag Restor 7(S1):S65–S68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ouyang ZY, Zheng H (2009) Ecological mechanisms of ecosystem services. Acta Ecol Sin 29(11):6183–6188

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pei TF (2000) Natural forest conversation and flood control and treatment in Northeast China. In: Zhang PC (ed) Discussion on natural forest conservation programme. Chinese Forestry Press, Beijing, pp 275–293

    Google Scholar 

  21. Petit S, Firbank L, Wyatt B, Howard D (2001) MIRABEL: models for integrated review and assessment of biodiversity in European landscapes. Ambio 30(2):81–88

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Polasky S, Nelson E, Pennington D, Johnson KA (2011) The impact of land-use change on ecosystem services, biodiversity and returns to landowners: a case study in the state of Minnesota. Environ Resour Econ (Dordr) 48(2):219–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R Development Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. The R Foundation for Statistical Comupting, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rands MRW, Adams WM, Bennun L, Butchart SHM, Clements A, Coomes D, Entwistle A, Hodge I, Kapos V, Scharlemann JPW, Sutherland WJ, Vira B (2010) Biodiversity conservation: challenges beyond 2010. Science 329(5997):1298–1303

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosenberg KV, Lowe JD, Dhondt AA (1999) Effects of forest fragmentation on breeding tanagers: a continental perspective. Conserv Biol 13(3):568–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287(5459):1770–1774

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sharp R, Tallis HT, Ricketts T, Guerry AD, Wood SA, Chaplin-Kramer R, Nelson E, Ennaanay D, Wolny S, Olwero N, Vigerstol K, Pennington D, Mendoza G, Aukema J, Foster J, Forrest J, Cameron D, Arkema K, Lonsdorf E, Kennedy C, Verutes G, Kim CK, Guannel G, Papenfus M, Toft J, Marsik M, Bernhardt J, Griffin R, Glowinski K, Chaumont N, Perelman A, Lacayo M, Mandle L, Hamel P, Vogl AL, L R, W B (2016) InVEST + VERSION + user’s guide. The natural capital project. Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund, Stanford

  28. Tan K, Piao SL, Peng CH, Fang JY (2007) Satellite-based estimation of biomass carbon stocks for northeast China’s forests between 1982 and 1999. For Ecol Manag 240(1–3):114–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Terrado M, Sabater S, Chaplin-Kramer B, Mandle L, Ziv G, Acuña V (2016) Model development for the assessment of terrestrial and aquatic habitat quality in conservation planning. Sci Total Environ 540:63–70

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tilman D, Fargione J, Wolff B, D’Antonio C, Dobson A, Howarth R, Schindler D, Schlesinger WH, Simberloff D, Swackhamer D (2001) Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292(5515):281–284

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang SQ, Zhou CH, Liu JY, Li KR, Yang XM (2001) Simulation analyses of terrestrial carbon cycle balance model in Northeast China. Acta Geogr Sin 56(4):390–400

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang ZQ, Fu JC, Quan B, Zhang DS, Wang F (2010) Changes of reproduction habitat quality of red-crowned crane in Zhalong wetlands. Chin J Appl Ecol 21(11):2871–2875

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wu JS, Cao QW, Shi SQ, Huang XL, Lu ZQ (2015) Spatio-temporal variability of habitat quality in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Area based on land use change. Chin J Appl Ecol 26(11):3457–3466

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yu DP, Zhou L, Zhou WM, Ding H, Wang QW, Wang Y, Wu XQ, Dai LM (2011) Forest management in Northeast China: history, problems, and challenges. Environ Manag 48(6):1122–1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang YL, Dong RC (2018) Impacts of Street-visible greenery on housing prices: evidence from a hedonic price model and a massive street view image dataset in Beijing. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 7(3):104

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Management, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, 110016, People’s Republic of China

    Limin Dai, Shanlin Li, Bernard J. Lewis, Jian Wu, Dapao Yu, Wangming Zhou, Li Zhou & Shengnan Wu

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, People’s Republic of China

    Shanlin Li & Jian Wu

Authors
  1. Limin Dai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shanlin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bernard J. Lewis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jian Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dapao Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wangming Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Li Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Shengnan Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Wu.

Additional information

Project funding: The work was supported by the Key Research Program from Chinese Academy of Sciences (KFZD-SW-305-001) and Special Research Institute Project (Y5YZX151YD).

The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.com

Corresponding editor: Tao Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dai, L., Li, S., Lewis, B.J. et al. The influence of land use change on the spatial–temporal variability of habitat quality between 1990 and 2010 in Northeast China. J. For. Res. 30, 2227–2236 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-018-0771-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • InVEST model
  • Habitat quality
  • Land use change
  • Landscape pattern