Advertisement

Disturbance history, species diversity, and structural complexity of a temperate deciduous forest

  • Jonathan D. Goode
  • Carson R. Barefoot
  • Justin L. Hart
  • Daniel C. Dey
Original Paper
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Stand structural complexity enhancement is an increasingly popular management objective, especially on public lands. Complex stand structures are hypothesized to support a relatively high degree of native forest diversity and be more resistant and resilient to disturbances. Complex structures are characterized by the presence of deadwood and heterogeneity of tree-size classes and tree architecture. Relatively little is known about how discrete disturbance events affect structural complexity and compositional diversity in Quercus-dominated stands at fine spatial scales (i.e. neighborhoods). We established 20 0.05 ha fixed-radius plots on the Sipsey Wilderness of William B. Bankhead National Forest in northern Alabama to quantify woody plant species composition and structure. Trees were mapped on each plot to quantify overstory structural complexity and compositional diversity. We extracted two cores from all canopy Quercus spp. ≥ 5 cm diameter at breast height to quantify age, recruitment pulses, and reconstruct canopy disturbance history. Shannon species diversity in the sampled area was 1.75 for trees, 2.08 for saplings, and 1.69 for seedlings. Quercus alba had the greatest basal area, and Ostrya virginiana had the highest density. The stand exhibited a reverse J-shaped distribution with a q-factor of 1.72. The oldest Quercus dated to 1795, and the largest recruitment pulse occurred in the 1870s. The mean return interval for intermediate-severity disturbance was 38 years. Although we documented no relationships between disturbance frequency and compositional diversity at the neighborhood scale (0.05 ha), less frequent disturbance was associated with higher structural complexity (r2 = 0.258, p = 0.026) at the neighborhood scale. We suggest that localized disturbance increases species diversity and structural complexity, but these processes are manifest at the stand level and not at the neighborhood scale. We conclude that the spatial variability (i.e. size, shape, orientation, microsite conditions) is likely more influential on diversity and complexity than the temporal variation (frequency) of these processes at the neighborhood scale.

Keywords

Canopy gap Quercus (oak) Stand development Succession 

Abbreviations

dbh

Diameter at breast height

ha

Hectare

H

Shannon–Weiner diversity index

J

Species evenness

Mi

Species mingling index

NOAA

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Jonathan Kleinman and Scott Ford for assistance in the field; the Bankhead National Forest staff for logistical support; and Jonathan Kressuk and Raien Emery for assistance in the lab.

Author’s contributions

JDG, CRB, and JLH conceived and designed the study. JDG and CRB led field data collection and data analysis. JDG, CRB, JLH, and DCD wrote the paper.

References

  1. Abrams MD, Nowacki GJ (1992) Historical variation in fire, oak recruitment, and post-logging accelerates succession in central Pennsylvania. J Torrey Bot Soc 119(1):19–28.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2996916 Google Scholar
  2. Addor ML, Birkhoff J (2004) Bankhead National Forest health & restoration initiative: final report. NCSU Extension. https://projects.ncsu.edu/nrli/decision-making/archive/documents/BankheadFinalReport1.23.04.pdf
  3. Batista WB, Platt WJ (2003) Tree population responses to hurricane disturbance: syndromes in a south-eastern USA old-growth forest. J Ecol 91(2):197–212Google Scholar
  4. Boyden S, Montgomery R, Reich PB, Palik B (2012) Seeing the forest for the heterogeneous trees: stand-scale resource distributions emerge from tree-scale structure. Ecol Appl 22(5):1578–1588PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Braun EL (1950) Deciduous forests of eastern North America. Deciduous forests of Eastern North AmericaGoogle Scholar
  6. Brose PH, Dey DC, Phillips RJ, Waldrop TA (2013) A meta-analysis of the fire-oak hypothesis: does prescribed burning promote oak reproduction in eastern North America. For Sci 59(3):322–334Google Scholar
  7. Brown ND, Jennings S (1998) Gap-size niche differentiation by tropical rainforest trees: a testable hypothesis or a broken-down bandwagon. Dynamics of tropical communities. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 79–94Google Scholar
  8. Buchanan ML, Hart JL (2011) A methodological analysis of canopy disturbance reconstructions using Quercus alba. Can J For Res 41(6):1359–1367.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x11-057 Google Scholar
  9. Buchanan ML, Hart JL (2012) Canopy disturbance history of old-growth Quercus alba sites in the eastern United States: examination of long-term trends and broad-scale patterns. For Ecol Manag 267:28–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.034 Google Scholar
  10. Burrascano S, Keeton WS, Sabatini FM, Blasi C (2013) Commonality and variability in the structural attributes of moist temperate old-growth forests: a global review. For Ecol Manag 291:458–479.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.11.020 Google Scholar
  11. Canham CD, Marks PL (1985) The response of woody plants to disturbance patterns of establishment and growth. In: Pickett STA, White PS (eds) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 197–216Google Scholar
  12. Coates KD, Burton PJ (1997) A gap-based approach for development of silvicultural systems to address ecosystem management objectives. For Ecol Manag 99(3):337–354.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00113-8 Google Scholar
  13. Cowden MM, Hart JL, Schweitzer CJ, Dey DC (2014) Effects of intermediate-severity wind disturbance on composition, structure, and succession in Quercus stands: implications for natural disturbance-based silviculture. For Ecol Manag 330:240–251.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.07.003 Google Scholar
  14. Cox LE, Hart JL, Dey DC, Schweitzer CJ (2016) Composition, structure, and intra-stand spatial patterns along a disturbance severity gradient in a Quercus stand. For Ecol Manag 381:305–317.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.09.040 Google Scholar
  15. Dey DC (2014) Sustaining oak forests in eastern North America: regeneration and recruitment, the pillars of sustainability. For Sci 60(5):926–942Google Scholar
  16. Duursma RA, Mäkelä A (2007) Summary models for light interception and light-use efficiency of non-homogeneous canopies. Tree Physiol 27(6):859–870.  https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/27.6.859 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. ESRI (2011) ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Environmental Systems Research Institute, RedlandsGoogle Scholar
  18. Fenneman NM (1938) Physiography of eastern United States. McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Ford SA, Kleinman JS, Hart JL (2017) Spatial patterns of canopy disturbance, structure, and species composition in a multi-cohort hardwood stand. Forests 8(3):93.  https://doi.org/10.3390/f8030093 Google Scholar
  20. Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) National Program (2005) 3.0 Phase 3 Field Guide Down Woody Materials, pp 1–38Google Scholar
  21. Fralish JS (2003) The central hardwood forest: its boundaries and physiographic provinces. In: Van Sambeek JW, Dawson JO, Ponder F Jr., Loewenstein EF, Fralish JS (eds) Proceedings, 13th Central Hardwood forest conference; 2002 April 1–3; Urbana, IL. General Technical Report NC-234. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  22. Franklin JF, Mitchell RJ, Palik B (2007) Natural disturbance and stand development principles for ecological forestry. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Washington, p 44Google Scholar
  23. Fraver S, White AS (2005) Identifying growth releases in dendrochronological studies of forest disturbance. Can J For Res 35(7):1648–1656.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x05-092 Google Scholar
  24. Fraver S, Ringvall A, Jonsson BG (2007) Refining volume estimates of down woody debris. Can J For Res 37(3):627–633.  https://doi.org/10.1139/X06-269 Google Scholar
  25. Frelich LE, Sugita S, Reich PB, Davis MB, Friedman SK (1998) Neighbourhood effects in forests: implications for within-stand patch structure. J Ecol 86(1):149–161Google Scholar
  26. Geological Survey of Alabama (GSA) (2006) Geologic map of Alabama, digital version 1.0: Alabama Geological Survey Special Map 220A [adapted from Szabo MW, Osborne WE, Copeland CW, Neathery TL, (1988) Geologic map of Alabama (1:250, 000): Alabama Geological Survey Special Map 220Google Scholar
  27. Griffith GE, Omernik JM, Comstock JA, Lawrence S, Martin G, Goddard A, Hulcher VJ, Foster T (2001) Ecoregions of Alabama and Georgia (Color Poster with Map, Descriptive Text, Summary Tables, and Photographs; Map Scale 1:1,7000,000). US Geological Survey, RestonGoogle Scholar
  28. Grissino-Mayer HD (2001) Evaluating crossdating accuracy: a manual and tutorial for the computer program COFECHA. Tree-Ring Res 57:205–221Google Scholar
  29. Hale CM, Pastor J, Rusterholz KA (1999) Comparison of structural and compositional characteristics in old-growth and mature, managed hardwood forests of Minnesota, USA. Can J For Res 29(10):1479–1489.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x99-076 Google Scholar
  30. Hardiman BS, Bohrer G, Gough CM, Vogel CS, Curtis PS (2011) The role of canopy structural complexity in wood net primary production of a maturing northern deciduous forest. Ecology 92(9):1818–1827.  https://doi.org/10.1890/10-2192.1 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hart JL (2016) Gap-scale disturbances in central hardwood forests with implications for management. In: Greenberg CH, Collins BS (eds) Natural disturbances and historic range of variation: type, frequency, severity, and post-disturbance structure in central hardwood forests USA. Springer, BaselGoogle Scholar
  32. Hart JL, Cox LE (2017) Incorporating intermediate-severity disturbances in oak stand development. Forests 8(8):284.  https://doi.org/10.3390/f8080284 Google Scholar
  33. Hart JL, Grissino-Mayer HD (2008) Vegetation patterns and dendroecology of a mixed hardwood forest on the Cumberland Plateau: implications for stand development. For Ecol Manag 255(5):1960–1975.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.12.018 Google Scholar
  34. Hart JL, Grissino-Mayer HD (2009) Gap-scale disturbance processes in secondary hardwood stands on the Cumberland Plateau, Tennessee, USA. Plant Ecol 201(1):131–146.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-008-9488-9 Google Scholar
  35. Hart JL, Clark SL, Torreano SJ, Buchanan ML (2012) Composition, structure, and dendroecology of an old-growth Quercus forest on the tablelands of the Cumberland Plateau, USA. For Ecol Manag 266:11–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.001 Google Scholar
  36. Hart JL, Cowden MM, Torreano SJ, Vestal PR (2015) Disturbance, succession, and structural development of an upland hardwood forest on the Interior Low Plateau, Tennessee. Nat Areas J 35(4):557–573.  https://doi.org/10.3375/043.036.0102 Google Scholar
  37. Holmes RL (1983) Computer-assisted quality control in tree-ring dating and measurement. Tree-ring Bull 43:69–78Google Scholar
  38. Hutchinson TF, Long RP, Rebbeck J, Sutherland EK, Yaussy DA (2012) Repeated prescribed fires alter gap-phase regeneration in mixed-oak forests. Can J For Res 42(2):303–314Google Scholar
  39. International Business Machines Corp (IBM). Released 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. IBM Corp, ArmonkGoogle Scholar
  40. Jõgiste K, Korjus H, Stanturf JA, Frelich LE, Baders E, Donis J, Jansons A, Kangur A, Köster K, Laarmann D, Maaten T, Marozas V, Metslaid M, Nigul K, Polyachenko O, Randveer T, Vodde F (2017) Hemiboreal forest: natural disturbances and the importance of ecosystem legacies to management. Ecosphere.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1706 Google Scholar
  41. Keasberry AM, Hart JL, Dey DC, Schweitzer CJ (2016) Spatial patterns of irradiance and advanced reproduction along a canopy disturbance severity gradient in an upland hardwood stand. Forests 7(4):73.  https://doi.org/10.3390/f7040073 Google Scholar
  42. Keeton WS (2006) Managing for late-successional/old-growth characteristics in northern hardwood-conifer forests. For Ecol Manag 235(1):129–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.08.005 Google Scholar
  43. Kint V, Van Meirvenne M, Nachtergale L, Geudens G, Lust N (2003) Spatial methods for quantifying forest stand structure development: a comparison between nearest-neighbor indices and variogram analysis. For Sci 49(1):36–49Google Scholar
  44. Larsen DR, Johnson PS (1998) Linking the ecology of natural oak regeneration to silviculture. For Ecol Manag 106(1):1–7Google Scholar
  45. Long JN (2009) Emulating natural disturbance regimes as a basis for forest management: a North American view. For Ecol Manag 257(9):1868–1873.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.12.019 Google Scholar
  46. Lorimer CG (1980) Age structure and disturbance history of a southern Appalachian virgin forest. Ecology 61(5):1169–1184.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1936836 Google Scholar
  47. Lorimer CG (1985) Methodological considerations in the analysis of forest disturbance history. Can J For Res 15(1):200–213.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x85-038 Google Scholar
  48. Lorimer CG (1993) Causes of the oak regeneration problem. In: Oak regeneration: serious problems, practical recommendations. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report SE-84, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station, Asheville, NC, pp 14–39Google Scholar
  49. Lorimer CH, Frelich LE (1989) A methodology for estimating canopy disturbance frequency and intensity in dense temperate forests. Can J For Res 19(5):651–663.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x89-102 Google Scholar
  50. Lowenstein EF, Johnson PS, Garrett HE (2000) Age and diameter structure of a managed uneven-aged oak forest. Can J For Res 30:1060–1070Google Scholar
  51. Ludwig JA, Reynolds JF (1988) Statistical ecology: a primer on methods and computing. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Martin WH (1992) Characteristics of old-growth mixed mesophytic forests. Nat Areas J 12(3):127Google Scholar
  53. McCarthy BC, Bailey DR (1996) Composition, structure, and disturbance history of Crabtree Woods: an old-growth forest f western Maryland. Bull Torrey Bot Club 124(4):350–365.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2996783 Google Scholar
  54. McCarthy BC, Small CJ, Rubino DL (2001) Composition, structure and dynamics of Dysart Woods, an old-growth mixed mesophytic forest of southeastern Ohio. For Ecol Manag 140(2):193–213.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00280-2 Google Scholar
  55. McComb WC, Muller RN (1983) Snag densities in old-growth and second-growth Appalachian forests. J Wildl Manag 47(2):376–382.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3808510 Google Scholar
  56. McElhinny C, Gibbons P, Brack C, Bauhus J (2005) Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: its definition and measurement. For Ecol Manag 218(1):1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.08.034 Google Scholar
  57. McEwan RW, Dyer JM, Pederson N (2011) Multiple interacting ecosystem drivers: toward an encompassing hypothesis of oak forest dynamics across eastern North America. Ecography 34(2):234–256.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06390.x Google Scholar
  58. Metzger FT, Burns RM, Honkala BH (1990) Ostrya virginiana (Mill.) K. Koch. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH (eds) Silvics of North America, vol 2. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  59. Midgley JJ, Cameron MC, Bond WJ (1995) Gap characteristics and replacement patterns in the Knysna Forest, South Africa. J Veg Sci 6(1):29–36.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3236253 Google Scholar
  60. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Storm Events Database—Event Details | National Centers for Environmental Information (2016) Ncdc.noaa.gov. Retrieved 25 Aug 2017 from https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/stormevents/eventdetails.jsp?id=309220
  61. National Weather Service (NWS) (2017) Alabama tornado database. https://www.weather.gov/bmx/tornadodb_main. Accessed 21 Sept 2017
  62. Nowacki GJ, Abrams MD (1994) Forest composition, structure, and disturbance history of the Alan Seeger Natural Area, Huntington County, Pennsylvania. Bull Torrey Bot Club 121(3):277–291.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2997182 Google Scholar
  63. Nowacki GJ, Abrams MD (1997) Radial growth averaging criteria for reconstructing disturbance histories from presettlement-origin oaks. Ecol Monogr 67(2):225–249.  https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(1997)067 Google Scholar
  64. Nowacki GJ, Abrams MD (2008) The demise of fire and ‘‘mesophication’’ of forests in the eastern United States. Bioscience 58(2):123–138.  https://doi.org/10.1641/B580207 Google Scholar
  65. Nyland RD (2002) Silviculture: concepts and applications. Waveland Press Inc., Long GroveGoogle Scholar
  66. O’Hara KL, Ramage BS (2013) Silviculture in an uncertain world: Utilizing multi-aged management systems to integrate disturbance. Forestry 86(4):401–410.  https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpt012 Google Scholar
  67. O’Hara KL (2014) Multiaged silviculture: managing for complex forest stand structures. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  68. Oliver CD, Larson BC (1996) Forest stand dynamics: updated edition. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  69. Orvis KH, Grissino-Mayer HD (2002) Standardizing the reporting of abrasive papers used to surface tree–ring samples. Tree-Ring Res 58(1/2):47–50Google Scholar
  70. Parker GR (1989) Old–growth forests of the central hardwood region. Nat Areas J 9(1):5–11Google Scholar
  71. Parker RP, Hart JL (2014) Patterns of riparian and in–stream large woody debris across a chronosequence of southern Appalachian hardwood stands. Nat Areas J 34:65–78.  https://doi.org/10.3375/043.034.0108 Google Scholar
  72. Pastorella F, Paletto A (2013) Stand structure indices as tools to support forest management: an application in Trentino forests (Italy). J For Sci 59(4):159–168Google Scholar
  73. Peterson CJ (2007) Consistent influence of tree diameter and species on damage in nine eastern North America tornado blowdowns. For Ecol Manag 250(1):96–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.013 Google Scholar
  74. Phillips DL, Shure DJ (1990) Patch size effects on early succession in southern Appalachian forests. Ecology 71(1):204–212.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1940260 Google Scholar
  75. Pommerening A (2002) Approaches to quantifying forest structures. Forestry 75(3):306–324.  https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/75.3.305 Google Scholar
  76. Pommerening A (2012) CRANCOD: a program for the analysis and reconstruction of spatial forest structure. Bern University of Applied Sciences, BernGoogle Scholar
  77. Pommerening A, Stoyan D (2006) Edge–correction needs in estimating indices of spatial forest structure. Can J For Res 36(7):1723–1739.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x06-060 Google Scholar
  78. Pond NC, Froese RE (2015) Interpreting stand structure through diameter distributions. For Sci 61(3):429–437Google Scholar
  79. Poulson TL, Platt WJ (1989) Gap light regimes influence canopy tree diversity. Ecology 70(3):553–555.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1940202 Google Scholar
  80. PRISM Climate Group (2016) http://www.prism.oregonstate.edu/. Accessed 11 Nov 2016
  81. Puettmann KJ, Coates KD, Messier C (2009) A critique of silviculture: managing for complexity. Island Press, Washington, p 38Google Scholar
  82. Rentch JS (2001) Stand dynamics and disturbance history of five oak–dominated old–growth stands in the Unglaciated Appalachian Plateau. Ph.D. Dissertation, West Virginia University, MorgantownGoogle Scholar
  83. Rentch JS, Fajvan MA, Hicks RR (2003) Oak establishment and canopy accession strategies in five old–growth stands in the central hardwood forest region. For Ecol Manag 184(1):285–297.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03),00155-5 Google Scholar
  84. Richards JD, Hart JL (2011) Canopy gap dynamics and development patterns in secondary Quercus stands on the Cumberland Plateau, Alabama, USA. For Ecol Manag 262(12):2229–2239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.08.015 Google Scholar
  85. Rubino DL, McCarthy BC (2004) Comparative analysis of dendroecological methods used to assess disturbance events. Dendrochronologia 21(3):97–115.  https://doi.org/10.1078/1125.7865.00047 Google Scholar
  86. Runkle JR (1981) Gap regeneration in some old-growth forests of the eastern United States. Ecology 62(4):1041–1051.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1937003 Google Scholar
  87. Saunders MR, Wagner RG (2008) Long–term spatial and structural dynamics in Acadian mixedwood stands managed under various silvicultural systems. Can J For Res 38(3):498–517.  https://doi.org/10.1139/X07-155 Google Scholar
  88. Schweitzer CJ, Dey DC (2011) Forest structure, composition, and tree diversity response to a gradient of regeneration harvests in the mid–Cumberland Plateau escarpment region, USA. For Ecol Manag 262(9):1729–1741.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.07.020 Google Scholar
  89. Smalley GW (1979) Classification and evaluation for forest sites on the southern Cumberland Plateau. USDA, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, GTR SO–23, New OrleansGoogle Scholar
  90. Spellerberg IF, Fedor PJ (2003) A tribute to Claude Shannon (1916–2001) and a plea for more rigorous use of species richness, species diversity and the ‘Shannon–Wiener’ Index. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12(3):177–179Google Scholar
  91. Staudhammer CL, LeMay VM (2001) Introduction and evaluation of possible indices of stand structural diversity. Can J For Res 31(7):1105–1115Google Scholar
  92. Stokes MA, Smiley TL (1996) An introduction to Tree–ring Dating. University of Arizona Press, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  93. Thornthwaite CW (1948) An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr Rev 38(1):55–94.  https://doi.org/10.2307/210739 Google Scholar
  94. Trotsiuk V, Svoboda M, Janda P, Mikolas M, Bace R, Rejzek J, Samonil P, Chaskovskyy O, Korol M, Myklush S (2014) A mixed severity disturbance regime in the primary Picea abies (L.) Karst. forests of the Ukrainian Carpathians. For Ecol Manag 334:144–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.09.005 Google Scholar
  95. Tyrrell LE, Nowacki GJ, Buckley DS, Nauertz EA, Niese JN, Rollinger JL, Zasada JC (1998) Information about old growth for selected forest type groups in the eastern United States. US Forest Service General Technical ReportGoogle Scholar
  96. US Forest Service of Alabama (2003) History of National Forests in Alabama. http://www.southernregion.fs.fed.us/alabama/forests/forest–history.htm
  97. Velmex Inc. (2009) Velmex Measurement SystemGoogle Scholar
  98. Villalba R, Veblen TT (1997) Improving estimates of total tree ages based on increment core samples. Ecoscience 4(4):534–542Google Scholar
  99. Voor Tech Consulting (2008) Measure J2XGoogle Scholar
  100. Weber TA, Hart JL, Schweitzer CJ, Dey DC (2014) Influence of gap–scale disturbance on developmental and successional pathways in Quercus-Pinus stands. For Ecol Manag 331:60–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.08.006 Google Scholar
  101. White PS, Pickett STA (1985) Natural disturbance and patch dynamics: An introduction. In: Pickett STA, White PS (eds) The ecology and natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 3–13Google Scholar
  102. White SA, Hart JL, Schweitzer CJ, Dey DC (2015) Altered structural development and accelerated succession from intermediate-scale wind disturbance in Quercus stands on the Cumberland Plateau, USA. For Ecol Manag 336:52–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.10.013 Google Scholar
  103. Woodall CW, Heath LS, Domke GM, Nichols MC (2011) Methods and equations for estimating aboveground volume, biomass, and carbon for trees in the US forest inventory; 2010Google Scholar
  104. Zenner EK, Peck JE (2018) Floating neighborhoods reveal contribution of individual trees to high sub-stand scale heterogeneity. For Ecol Manag 412:29–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.01.054 Google Scholar
  105. Zhang LJ, Oswald BP, Green TH (1999) Relationships between overstory species and community classification of the Sipsey Wilderness, Alabama. For Ecol Manag 114(2):337–383.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98),00368-5 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan D. Goode
    • 1
  • Carson R. Barefoot
    • 1
  • Justin L. Hart
    • 1
  • Daniel C. Dey
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of AlabamaTuscaloosaUSA
  2. 2.Northern Research StationUSDA Forest ServiceColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations