Advertisement

Spatial correlation of pit and mound topography with canopy gaps in a virgin mixed beech forest, northern Iran

  • Hashem Habashi
Original Paper
  • 62 Downloads

Abstract

In a reserved forest parcel in a virgin eastern Hyrcanian mixed beech forest, 80 ha was surveyed to determine the pit and mound topography, canopy gaps and dead trees. The aim was to investigate the spatial patterns and correlation of pit and mound features with canopy gaps. Seventy-five canopy gaps and 61 pit and mound features were identified. The univariate first order nearest neighbor (RCE) and bivariate second order test (Ripley’s K) statistic were applied. RCE statistics highlighted a general aggregation pattern for canopy gaps and pits and mounds, while pits and mounds alone were more clumped. Distances between canopy gaps were 130 m average, whereas distances between pit and mound features and dead trees were 60 and 78 m, respectively. Spatial positive correlation of canopy gaps with pits and mounds were observed with all distances. The result of spatial correlations between canopy gaps with pits and mounds confirmed that windthrows cause micro successions in fallen tree ecosystem-scale correlated with gap phase dynamics in the forest community-scale.

Keywords

Pit and mound Canopy gap Mixed beech Spatial pattern Spatial correlation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is made possible through the help of Dr. Kooch and Ph.D. student Mrs. Moghimian for her efforts at the M.Sc. level. This project would have been impossible without the support of GAUSNR (Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources) grant. Also, I would like to thanks Dr. Ron Ayling and Dr. Chai for editing my paper.

References

  1. Akhavan R, Sagheb-Talebi Kh, Zenner EK, Safavimanesh F (2012) Spatial patterns in different forest development stages of an intact old-growth oriental beech forest in the Caspian region of Iran. Eur J For Res 125(1):225–237Google Scholar
  2. Clark PJ, Evans FC (1954) Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35:445–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clinton BD, Baker C (2000) Catastrophic windthrow in the Southern Appalachians: characteristics of pits and mounds and initial vegetation responses. For Ecol Manag 126:51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dounavi A, Koutsias N, Ziehe H, Hattemer H (2010) Spatial patterns and genetic structures within beech populations (Fagus sylvatica L.) of forked and non-forked individuals. Eur J For Res 129:1191–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duncan RP, Stewart GH (1991) The temporal and spatial analysis of tree age distributions. Can J For Res 21:1703–1710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Habashi H, Hosseini SM, Mohammadi J, Rahmani R (2007) Stand structure and spatial pattern of trees in mixed Hyrcanian beech forests of Iran. Iran J For Poplar Res 15:55–64Google Scholar
  7. Heiri C, Wolf A, Rohrer L, Bugmann H (2009) Forty years of natural dynamics in Swiss beech forests: structure, composition, and the influence of former management. Ecol Appl 19(7):1920–1934CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jonsson BG (1993) Treefall disturbance, succession, and diversity in boreal forest floor vegetation. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Umea SwedenGoogle Scholar
  9. Kan B, Wang Q, Wu W (2015) The influence of selective cutting of mixed Korean pine (Pinus koraiensis Sieb. et Zucc.) and broad-leaf forest on rare species distribution patterns and spatial correlation in Northeast China. J For Res 26(4):833–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kooch Y, Hosseini SH, Mohammadi J, Hojjati SM (2013) Effects of pit and mound landscape on soil ecosystem engineers at local scales-a case Study in Hyrcanian forest. Mol Soil Biol 4(1):7–15Google Scholar
  11. Krebs CJ (1994) Ecology: the experimental analysis of distribution and abundance, 4th edn. Harper Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Kunstler J, Curt T, Lepart J (2004) Spatial pattern of beech (Fagus csylvatica L.) and Oak (Quercus pubescens Mill) seedling in natural pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) wood lands. Eur J For Res 123:331–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liebhold AM, Gurevitch J (2002) Integrating the statistical analysis of spatial data in ecology. Ecography 25:553–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liechty HO, Jurgensen MF, Mroz GD, Gale MR (1997) Pit and mound topography and its influence on storage of carbon, nitrogen, and organic matter within an old-growth forest. Can J For Res 27(12):1992–1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maimon O, Rokach L (2010) Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 851–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martinez I, Wiegand T, Gonzalez-Taboada F, Obesco JR (2010) Spatial associations among tree species in a temperate forest community in North-western Spain. For Ecol Manag 260:456–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marvie Mohadjer MR (2007) Silviculture. Tehran University Publications, TehranGoogle Scholar
  18. Mcsweeney K, Meyers NL (1995) Influence of windthrow on soil properties in northern Wisconsin. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59:871–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moeur M (1993) Characterizing spatial patterns of trees using stem mapped data. For Sci 39:756–775Google Scholar
  20. Nagel TA, Svoboda M, Diaci J (2006) Regeneration patterns after intermediate wind disturbance in an old-growth Fagus-Abies forest in southeastern Slovenia. For Ecol Manag 226:268–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oheimb G, Westphal C, Tempel H, Hardtle W (2005) Structural pattern of a near-natural beech forest (Fagus sylvatica)(Serrahn, North-east Germany). For Ecol Manag 212(1-3):253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Paluch J (2007) The spatial pattern of a natural European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)-silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) forest: a patch-mosaic perspective. For Ecol Manag 253:161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Parhizkar P, Sagheb-Talebi Kh, Mataji A, Namiranian M (2011) Influence of gap size and development stages on the silvicultural characteristics of oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) regeneration. Hyrcanian J Environ Sci 9(1):55–65Google Scholar
  24. Perry GLW (2004) SpPack: spatial point pattern analysis in Excel using visual basic for applications (VBA). Environ Model Softw 19:559–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Peterson CJ (2007) Consistent influence of tree diameter and species on damage in nine eastern North America tornado blow downs. For Ecol Manag 250:96–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Phillips JD (2008) Soil system modelling and generation of field hypotheses. Geoderma 145:419–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pielou EC (1961) Segregation and symmetry in two-species populations as studied in nearest-neighbour relationships. J Ecol 49:255–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pourbabaei H, Ahani H, Bonyad AE (2005) Spatial pattern of Maple trees (Acer platanoides L.) in Guilan province. J Environ 1:24–30Google Scholar
  29. Raphael P, Francois G (2001) A practical approach to the study of spatial structure in simple cases of heterogeneous vegetation. J Veg Sci 12(2):99–108Google Scholar
  30. Ripley BD (1981) Spatial statistics. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Runkle JR (1982) Patterns of disturbance in some old growth mesic forests of North America. Ecology 63:1533–1556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sagheb-Talebi Kh, Sajedi T, Yazdian F (2004) Forests of Iran. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands Press, Technical publication No. 339Google Scholar
  33. Schaetzl RJ, Johnson DL, Burns SF, Small TW (1989) Tree uprooting: review of impact on forest ecology. Vegetation 79:165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shambroch and Bokheim (2007) p 12Google Scholar
  35. Sinclair DF (1985) On tests of spatial randomness using mean nearest neighbor distance. Ecology 66:1084–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stone EL (1975) Winds throw influences on spatial heterogeneity in a forest soil. Mitt Eid Anst Forstl Versuchsw 51:77–87Google Scholar
  37. Ulanova NG (2000) The effects of windthrow on forests at different spatial scales: a review. For Ecol Manag 135:155–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Waez-Mousavi SM, Habashi H (2012) Evaluating humus forms variation in an unmanaged mixed beech forest using two different classification methods. iForest - Biogeosci For 5:272–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zeibig A, Diaci J, Wagner S (2005) Gap disturbance patterns of a Fagus sylvatica virgin forest remnant in the mountain vegetation belt of Slovenia. For. Snow Landsc Res 79:69–80Google Scholar
  40. Zenner EK, Peck JE (2009) Characterizing structural conditions in mature managed red pine: spatial dependency of metrics and adequacy of plot size. For Ecol Manag 257:311–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang Q, Zhang Y, Peng S, Yirdaw E, Wu N (2009) Spatial structure of Alpine trees in mountain Baima Xueshan on the southeast Tibetan plateau. Silva Fennica 43:197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Forest SciencesGorgon University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural ResourcesGorganIran

Personalised recommendations