Environmental load of solid wood floor production from larch grown at different planting densities based on a life cycle assessment

Original Paper


As one of the main structural units in a building, a solid wood floor has significant strategic research value for low-carbon energy saving. Taking the production line of a solid larch wood floor as a case study, we assessed the environmental load during production based upon a life cycle assessment. Using GaBi 6.0 software, we analyzed the associated carbon sequestration during floor production, with the initial planting density serving as the disturbance factor in a modular analysis. The results indicated that the cutting and finishing steps have relatively intense, negative influences on the environment, whereas transportation, ripping, and trimming do not. Additionally, recycling biomass waste has the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. When the initial planting density was 3.0 × 3.0 m, carbon sequestration was relatively high. Although the emissions of freshwater pollutants, volatile organic compounds, and fine particulate matter (matter with a 2.5-μm diameter) were comparatively high, the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions was still excellent at this planting density.


Environmental effect Larch Life cycle assessment Planting density Solid wood floor 


  1. Antonova GF, Stasova VV (1997) Effects of environmental factors on wood formation in larch (Larix sibirica Ldb) stems. Trees 11(8):462–468Google Scholar
  2. Begg K, Parkinson S, Wilkinson R (2001) Maximizing GHG emissions reduction and sustainable development aspects in the clean development mechanism. World Resour Rev 13:315–334Google Scholar
  3. Fredrik H, Christian A (2009) Bioenergy plantations or long-term carbon sinks?—a model based analysis. Biomass Bioenergy 33(12):1693–1702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Guinée JB (2002) Life cycle assessment: an operational guide to the ISO standards. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 1–273Google Scholar
  5. Guo MH (1996) A study on the relationship of cultivation measures and wood properties of red pine plantation. PhD Thesis, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, p 12–32Google Scholar
  6. He YJ, Qin L, Li ZY, Shao MX, Liang XY, Tan L, Feng ZW (2012) Carbon storage capacity of a Betula alnoides stand and a mixed Betula alnoides × Castanopsis hystrix stand in Southern Subtropical China: a comparison study. Acta Ecol Sin 32:7586–7594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Houghton RA, Skole DL (2000) Annual fluxes of carbon from deforestation and regrowth in the Brazlian Amazon. Nature 403(6767):301–304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. IPCC Climate Change (2013) Mitigation of climate change of working groups III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–65Google Scholar
  9. Li SL (2006) Study on forest carbon sequestration. Northeast Forestry University Press, Harbin, pp 22–34Google Scholar
  10. Ma W, Sun YJ, Guo XY, Ju WZ, Mu JS (2010) Carbon storage of Larix olgensis plantation at different stand ages. Acta Ecol Sin 30(17):4659–4667Google Scholar
  11. Nair AB, Sivasubramanian P, Balakrishnan P, Kumar KANA, Sreekala MS (2013) Environmental effects, biodegradation, and life cycle analysis of fully biodegradable “green” composites. In: Thomas S, Joseph SK, Malhotra K, Goda K, Sreekala MS (eds) Polymer composite. Wiley, Weinheim, pp 515–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nebel B, Zimmer B, Wegener G (2006) Life cycle assessment of wood floor coverings. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(3):172–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Olson KR, Al-Kaisi MM (2015) The importance of soil sampling depth for accurate account of soil organic carbon sequestration, storage, retention and loss. CATENA 125:33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Post WM, Emanuel WR, Zinke PJ, Stangenberger AG (1982) Soil carbon pools and world life zones. Nature 298(5870):156–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Primo P, Paolo S, Antonio B, Luana I, Luigi N, Luca R, Francesco P, Umberto D, Stefania P (2016) Assessment of carbon balance in intensive and extensive tree cultivation systems for oak, olive, poplar and walnut plantation. J Clean Prod 112(4):2613–2624Google Scholar
  16. Puettmann ME, Wilson JB (2005) Life-cycle analysis of wood products: cradle-to-gate LCI of residential wood building materials. Wood Fiber Sci 37:18–29Google Scholar
  17. Wu ZH (2015) Relation analysis of the life cycle and carbon sequestration of wood. Furniture 36(1–6):43Google Scholar
  18. Zhang XQ, Wu SH, He Y, Hou ZH (2005) Forests and forestry activities in relations to emission mitigation and sink enhancement. Sci Silvae Sin 41(6):150–156Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Bio-Based Material Science and Technology of the Ministry of EducationNortheast Forestry UniversityHarbinPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.College of Material EngineeringFujian Agriculture and Forestry UniversityFuzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations