Journal of Forestry Research

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 471–478 | Cite as

N, P, and K characteristics of different age groups of temperate coniferous tree species in northwestern China

  • Simin Liu
  • Hao Wang
Original Paper


This study chose dominant tree species including Picea crassifolia, Pinus armandii and Pinus tabuliformis which are distributed in Qilian Mountains, Xiaolongshan Mountains, and Bailongjiang River. According to the different tree species, ages and components, we sampled leaves, branches, stems, and roots, and measured the contents of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Potassium, along with soil fertility. The changes of N, P, and K contents in the different tree species were studied, and the relationship between nutrient content and environmental factors was analyzed. The results indicated that the content of P in all three species was the lowest (0.039–0.28 g kg−1), while N content was the highest (0.095–1.72 g kg−1). As the terminal organ of nutrient transport, the nutrient content of leaves was the highest. P. armandii (0.45 g kg−1) had a higher nutrient concentration than P. tabulaeformis (0.19 g kg−1) and P. crassifolia (0.29 g kg−1). The nutrient content of each species was highest in a young forest, but lowest in a mature forest. The nutrient content of all three tree species was significantly affected by soil nutrient content, and negatively correlated with available soil nutrients.


Different ages Northwestern China N, P, K Tree species 



We appreciated the reviewer’s comments on the previous version of the manuscript, which helped us greatly improve the quality and readability of the paper.


  1. Cernusak LA, Winter K, Turner BL (2010) Leaf nitrogen to phosphorus ratios of tropical trees: experimental assessment of physiological and environmental controls. N Phytol 185(3):770–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chapin FS (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:233–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chávez V, Macdonald SE (2010) The influence of canopy patch mosaics on understory plant community composition in boreal mixedwood forest. For Ecol Manag 259(6):1067–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Domínguez MT, Marañón T, Murillo JM, Schulin R, Robinson BH (2010) Nutritional status of Mediterranean trees growing in a contaminated and remediated area. Water Air Soil Pollut 205(1–4):305–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Franzaring J, Holz I, Zipperle J, Fangmeier A (2010) Twenty years of biological monitoring of element concentrations in permanent forest and grassland plots in Baden-Württemberg (SW Germany). Environ Sci Pollut Res 17(1):4–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gartzia-Bengoetxea N, Gonzalez-Arias A, Martínez de Arano I (2009) Effects of tree species and clear-cut forestry on forest-floor characteristics in adjacent temperate forests in northern Spain. Can J For Res 39(7):1302–1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grubb PJ (1977) Control of forest growth and distribution on wet tropical mountains: with special reference to mineral nutrition. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 8(1):83–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. He JS, Wang L, Flynn DF, Wang XP, Ma WH, Fang JY (2008) Leaf nitrogen: phosphorus stoichiometry across Chinese grassland biomes. Oecologia 155(2):301–310CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hessen DO, Jensen TC, Kyle M, Elser JJ (2007) RNA responses to N- and P-limitation; reciprocal regulation of stoichiometry and growth rate in Brachionus. Funct Ecol 21(5):956–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. IUSS Working Group WRB (2006) World reference base for soil resources 2006, 2nd edn. World Soil Resources Reports No. 203. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones Jr JB, Case VW (1990) Sampling, handling and analyzing plant tissue samples. In: Westerman RL (ed) Soil testing and plant analysis, 3rd edn. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 389–427Google Scholar
  12. Kang HZ, Zhuang HL, Wu LL, Liu QL, Shen GR, Berg B, Man RZ, Liu CJ (2011) Variation in leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry in Picea abies across Europe: an analysis based on local observations. For Ecol Manag 261(2):195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li LI, Xu XW, Sun YQ, Han W, Tu PF (2012) Effects of parasitic plant Cistanche deserticola on chlorophyll a fluorescence and nutrient accumulation of host plant Haloxylon ammodendron in the Taklimakan Desert. J Arid Land 4(3):342–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li Y, Jing C, Mao W, Cui D, Wang X, Zhao X (2014) N and P resorption in a pioneer shrub (Artemisia halodendron) inhabiting severely desertified lands of Northern China. J Arid Land 6(2):174–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Masunaga T, Kubota D, Hotta M, Wakatsuki T (1998a) Nutritional characteristics of mineral elements in leaves of tree species in tropical rain forest, West Sumatra, Indonesia. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 44(3):315–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Masunaga T, Kubota D, William U (1998b) Spatial distribution pattern of trees in relation to soil edaphic status in tropical rain forest in west Sumatra, Indonesia. I. Distribution of accumulation. Tropics 7:209–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mediavilla S, González-Zurdo P, Escudero A (2011) Morphological and chemical leaf composition of Mediterranean evergreen tree species according to leaf age. Trees 25(4):669–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Michopoulos P, Baloutsos G, Economou A, Samara C, Thomaidis NS, Grigoratos T (2007) Nutrient cycling and foliar status in an urban pine forest in Athens, Greece. Plant Soil 294(1–2):31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Minocha R, Long S, Thangavel P, Minocha SC, Eagar C, Driscoll CT (2010) Elevation dependent sensitivity of northern hardwoods to Ca addition at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, NH, USA. For Ecol Manag 260(12):2115–2124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sariyildiz T, Anderson JM (2005) Variation in the chemical composition of green leaves and leaf litters from three deciduous tree species growing on different soil types. For Ecol Manag 210(1):303–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Soil Survey Laboratory Staff (1996) Soil Survey Laboratory methods manual. Soil survey investigations report, vol 42. National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NE, Version 3.0, USDA-NRCSGoogle Scholar
  23. Susaya JP, Asio VB (2005) Status of phosphorus in the rain forest ecosystem of Mt. Pangasugan, Leyte, Philippines. Annals of Tropical ResearchGoogle Scholar
  24. Vitousek PM, Sanford RL (1986) Nutrient cycling in moist tropical forest. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17:137–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vitousek PM, Porder S, Houlton BZ, Chadwick OA (2010) Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen–phosphorus interactions. Ecol Appl 20(1):5–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Wardle DA, Walker LR, Bardgett RD (2004) Ecosystem properties and forest decline in contrasting long-term chronosequences. Science 305(5683):509–513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Webb CO, Donoghue MJ (2005) Phylomatic: tree assembly for applied phylogenetics. Mol Ecol Notes 5(1):181–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wu CC, Tsui CC, Hseih CF, Asio VB, Chen ZS (2007) Mineral nutrient status of tree species in relation to environmental factors in the subtropical rain forest of Taiwan. For Ecol Manag 239(1):81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. You WZ, Wei WJ, Zhang HD, Yan TW, Xing ZK (2013) Temporal patterns of soil CO2 efflux in a temperate Korean Larch (Larix olgensis Herry.) plantation, Northeast China. Trees 27(5):1417–1428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yu M, Sun JXO (2013) Effects of forest patch type and site on herb-layer vegetation in a temperate forest ecosystem. For Ecol Manag 300(300):14–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang YT, Li JM, Chang SL, Li X, Lu JJ (2012) Spatial distribution pattern of Picea schrenkiana population in the Middle Tianshan Mountains and the relationship with topographic attributes. J Arid Land 4(4):457–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Soil and Water ConservationBeijing Forestry UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations