Journal of Forestry Research

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 139–150 | Cite as

Analysis of temporal changes in land cover and landscape metrics of a managed forest in the west Black Sea region of northern Turkey: 1970–2010

  • Hayati Zengin
  • Ahmet Salih Değermenci
  • Pete Bettinger
Original Paper

Abstract

Forest structure changes continuously by natural and anthropogenic effects. Because the level of goods and services provided by forest ecosystems are related to this structure, some attributes have to be controlled while they are being managed. In this paper we describe the long-term temporal changes in land area and landscape metrics related to different land uses of a managed forest in Turkey. The study was carried out for the Daday Forest Planning Unit located in the west Black Sea region of northern Turkey. The total area is 16,813 ha and besides wood production, it is managed for erosion control, public health, aesthetics, and recreation. Stand type maps that were constructed in 1970, 1989, 1999, and 2010 were used in this analysis. Transition matrixes that illustrate area changes among cover types and temporal changes on some landscape metrics were obtained using Geographic Information Systems. Stands were separated into small patches, and thus the number of patches increased nearly two-fold between 1970 and 2010. The total forest edge increased and through the associated fragmentation, the amount of core forest area decreased at the landscape scale. Landscape metrics were applied to digitized versions of historical maps to assess how forest area changed. Human use of the land has changed, forest management practices have evolved, and these along with natural forest growth have contributed to interesting changes in landscape character.

Keywords

Landscape metrics Land cover change Temporal change Turkey 

References

  1. Atasoy M, Bıyık C, Demir O (2005) Ormanlık alanların zamansal değişiminin kadastro çalışmalarına etkisi. TMMOB Harita ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  2. Baskent EZ (1999) Controlling spatial structure of forested landscapes: a case study towards landscape management. Landsc Ecol 14:83–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bettinger P (2006) Measures of change in projected landscape conditions. J For Plan 12:39–47Google Scholar
  4. Bussink CB, Hijmans RJ (2000) Land-use change in the Cajamarca catchment, Peru, 1975–1996. In: Proceedings of CIP program report 1999–2000. Enriching the portfolio: CIP’s global and regional partnerships. Lima, Peru: International Potato Center. pp 421–428Google Scholar
  5. Caldas M, Walker R, Arima E, Perz S, Aldrich S, Simmons C (2007) Theorizing land cover and land use change: the peasant economy of Amazonian deforestation. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 97(1):86–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gautam AP, Edward WL, Ganesh SP, Michael ZA (2003) Land use dynamics and landscape change pattern in a mountain watershed in Nepal. Agr Ecosyst Environ 99:83–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. GDF (General Directorate of Forests) (2010) Forest management plan for 2010-2029 of Daday Forest Planning Unit. Ankara, p 238Google Scholar
  8. Grebner DL, Bettinger P, Siry JP (2013) Introduction to forestry and natural resources. Academic Press, New York, p 496Google Scholar
  9. Hargis CD, Bissonette JA, David JL (1998) The behavior of landscape metrics commonly used in the study of habitat Fragmentation. Landsc Ecol 13:167–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Herzog F, Lausch A, Müller E, Thulke HH, Steinhardt U, Lehman S (2001) Landscape metrics for assessment of landscape destruction and rehabilitation. Environ Manage 27:91–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Holzkamper A, Lausch A, Seppelt R (2005) How do changes in land use pattern affect species diversity?—An approach for optimizing landscape configuration. In: Proceedings of 45th Congress of the European Regional Science Association. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit. August 2005Google Scholar
  12. Inca CAG (2009) Assessing the land cover and land use change and its impact on watershed services in a tropical Andean watershed of Peru. Master’s Thesis. University of Jyväskylä, Faculty of Science, Department of Biological and Environmental Science, p 56Google Scholar
  13. Kadioğullari AI, Başkent EZ (2008) Spatial and temporal dynamics of land use pattern in eastern Turkey: a case study in Gümüşhane. Environ Monit Assess 138:289–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Keleş S, Sivrikaya F, Çakir G (2007) Temporal changes in forest landscape patterns in Artvin Forest Planning Unit, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 129(1–3):483–490PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Keleş S, Durusoy I, Çakir G (2016) Analysis of the changes in forest ecosystem functions, structure and composition in the Black Sea region of Turkey. J For Res. doi: 10.1007/s11676-016-0322-2 Google Scholar
  16. Kim K, Pauleit S (2007) Landscape character, biodiversity and land use planning: the case of Kwangju City Region, South Korea. Land Use Policy 24:264–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kimaro TA, Tachikawa Y, Takara K (2003) Evaluating land-use change effects on flood peaks using a distributed rainfall-runoff model in Yasu River, Japan. In: Proceedings of weather radar information and distributed hydrological modelling, Wallingford, UK: International Association of Hydrological Sciences. July 2003Google Scholar
  18. Küçük Ö (2011) Daday orman işletme müdürlüğü’nün yaban hayatı potansiyeli vedeğerlendirilmesi. Consulted 10 Sep. 2015. http://web.ogm.gov.tr/sertifikasyon/Kastamonu1/~/.pdf. Accessed 10 Sep 2015
  19. Leitao AB, Ahern J (2002) Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 59:65–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martín MJ, de Pablo CL, de Agar PM (2006) Landscape changes over time: comparison of land uses, boundaries and mosaics. Landsc Ecol 21:1075–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-GTR-351. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, p 141Google Scholar
  22. Plieninger T (2006) Habitat loss, fragmentation, and alteration–Quantifying the impact of land-use changes on a Spanish dehesa landscape by use of aerial photography and GIS. Landsc Ecol 21:91–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pontius RG, Cornell JD, Hall CAS (2001) Modeling the spatial pattern of land-use change with GEOMOD2: application and validation for Costa Rica. Agr Ecosyst Environ 1775:1–13Google Scholar
  24. Riitters KH, O’Neill RV, Hunsaker CT, Wickham JD, Yankee DH, Timmins SP (1995) A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landsc Ecol 10:23–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schindler S, Poirazidis K, Wrbka T (2008) Towards a core set of landscape metrics for biodiversity assessments: a case study from Dadia National Park, Greece. Ecol Ind 8:502–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shrestha BM, Dick BO, Singh B (2010) Effects of land-use change on carbon dynamics assessed by multi-temporal satellite imagery in a mountain watershed of Nepal. Acta Agric Scand Sect B Soil Plant Sci 60:10–23Google Scholar
  27. Sivertsen DP (1995) Habitat loss-its nature and effects (including case studies from New South Wales). In: Proceedings of conserving biodiversity: threats and solutions. Chipping Norton, New South Wales. pp 29–42Google Scholar
  28. Uuemaa E, Antrop M, Roosaare J, Marja R, Mander Ü (2009) Landscape metrics and indices: an overview of their use in landscape research. Living Rev Landsc Res 3:5–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Verburg PH, Overmars KP, Huigen MGA, de Groot WT, Veldkamp A (2006) Analysis of the effects of land use change on protected areas in the Philippines. Appl Geogr 26:153–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Waldhardt R, Simmering D, Otte A (2004) Estimation and prediction of plant species richness in a mosaic landscape. Landsc Ecol 19:211–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yu HY, Joshi PK, Das KK, Chauniyal DD, Melick DR, Yang XF (2007) Land use/cover change and environmental vulnerability analysis in Birahi Ganga sub-watershed of the Garhwal Himalaya, India. Trop Ecol 48:241–250Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hayati Zengin
    • 1
  • Ahmet Salih Değermenci
    • 1
  • Pete Bettinger
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Forest Management and Planning, Faculty of ForestryDuzce UniversityDuzceTurkey
  2. 2.Warnell School of Forestry and Natural ResourcesUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations