Journal of Forestry Research

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 909–915

Photosynthetic response of poplar leaves at different developmental phases to environmental factors

Original Paper
  • 67 Downloads

Abstract

With economic incentives and interests in fast-growing poplar trees for short-rotation production of fiber and veneer, many new poplar hybrids have been bred and planted in China, but how to match the new poplar clones to suitable sites and maintain their higher growth rates is still not very clear. In this study, the photosynthetic response of poplar leaves at various developmental stages during two seasons (summer and autumn) was explored and mechanistic models for the photosynthesis of poplar leaves at different developmental phases in response photosynthetic active radiation (PAR), temperature, and relatively humidity were established using the optimization software package 1st Opt. Mature poplar leaves in autumn had significantly higher photosynthetic capacity than leaves at other stages and seasons. Based on the models established for poplar leaves at different phases, the main limiting factors for photosynthesis at the research site were high PAR and temperature in the summer and low PAR in the autumn. Our results highlight the importance of selecting suitable sites, pruning and stand density control during the plantation development to maintain higher photosynthetic rates of poplar trees and to establish optimum cultivation patterns for various utilization of poplar plantations.

Keywords

Leaf development Model Photosynthesis Poplar plantation 

References

  1. Baldocchi DD, Harley PC (1995) Scaling carbon dioxide and water vapour exchange from leaf to canopy in a deciduous forest. II. Model testing and application. Plant Cell Environ 18(10):1157–1173. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00626.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Catský J, Šesták Z (1997) Photosynthesis during leaf development. Handbook of photosynthesis. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 633–660Google Scholar
  3. Constable GA, Rawson HM (1980) Effect of leaf position, expansion and age on photosynthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency of cotton. Funct Plant Biol 7(1):89–100. doi:10.1071/PP9800089 Google Scholar
  4. Dale JE (1992) How do leaves grow? Bioscience 42(6):423–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deckmyn G, Laureysens I, Garcia J, Muys B, Ceulemans R (2004) Poplar growth and yield in short rotation coppice: model simulations using the process model SECRETS. Biomass Bioenerg 26(3):221–227. doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00121-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dillenburg LR, Sullivan JH, Teramura AH (1995) Leaf expansion and development of photosynthetic capacity and pigments in Liquidambar styraciflua (Hamamelidaceae) -effects of UV-B radiation. Am J Bot 82:878–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dreyer E, Le Roux X, Montpied P, Daudet FA, Masson F (2001) Temperature response of leaf photosynthetic capacity in seedlings from seven temperate tree species. Tree Physiol 21(4):223–232. doi:10.1093/treephys/21.4.223 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fang S, Xu X, Lu S, Tang L (1999) Growth dynamics and biomass production in short-rotation poplar plantations: 6-year results for three clones at four spacings. Biomass Bioenerg 17(5):415–425. doi:10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00060-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fang S, Xie B, Liu D, Liu J (2011) Effects of mulching materials on nitrogen mineralization, nitrogen availability and poplar growth on degraded agricultural soil. New For 41(2):147–162. doi:10.1007/s11056-010-9217-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fang S, Zhai X, Wan J, Tang L (2013) Clonal variation in growth, chemistry and calorific value of new poplar hybrids at nursery stage. Biomass Bioenerg 54:303–311. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flexas J, Gulías J, Jonasson S, Medrano H, Mus M (2001) Seasonal patterns and control of gas exchange in local populations of the Mediterranean evergreen shrub Pistacia lentiscus L. Acta Oecol 22(1):33–43. doi:10.1016/S1146-609X(00)01099-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fung LE, Wang SS, Altman A, Hütterman A (1998) Effect of NaCl on growth, photosynthesis, ion and water relations of four poplar genotypes. For Ecol Manag 107(1):135–146. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00328-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greer DH, Halligan EA (2001) Photosynthetic and fluorescence light responses for kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) leaves at different stages of development on vines grown at two different photon flux densities. Funct Plant Biol 28(5):373–382. doi:10.1071/PP00146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guo XY, Zhang XS (2010) Performance of 14 hybrid poplar clones grown in Beijing, China. Biomass Bioenerg 34(6):906–911. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.01.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hansen EA (1991) Poplar woody biomass yields: a look to the future. Biomass Bioenerg 1(1):1–7. doi:10.1016/0961-9534(91)90046-F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harley PC, Tenhunen JD (1991) Modeling the photosynthetic response of C3 leaves to environmental factors. In: Boote KJ, Loomis RS (eds) Modeling crop photosynthesis—from biochemistry to canopy. CSSA, Madison, pp 17–39Google Scholar
  17. Jiang CD, Li PM, Gao HY, Zou Q, Jiang GM, Li LH (2005) Enhanced photoprotection at the early stages of leaf expansion in field-grown soybean plants. Plant Sci 168(4):911–919. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lauenroth WK, Dodd JL, Sims PL (1978) The effects of water-and nitrogen-induced stresses on plant community structure in a semiarid grassland. Oecologia 36(2):211–222. doi:10.1007/BF00349810 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lautner S, Grams T, Matyssek R, Fromm J (2005) Characteristics of electrical signals in poplar and responses in photosynthesis. Plant Physiol 138(4):2200–2209. doi:10.1104/pp.105.064196 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Le Roux X, Gran S, Dreyer E, Daudet FA (1999) Parameterization and testing of a biochemically based photosynthesis model for walnut (Juglans regia) trees and seedlings. Tree Physiol 19:481–492Google Scholar
  21. Medlyn BE, Loustau D, Delzon S (2002) Temperature response of parameters of a biochemically based model of photosynthesis. I. Seasonal changes in mature maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). Plant Cell Environ 25(9):1155–1165. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00890.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meir P, Kruijt B, Broadmeadow M, Barbosa E, Kull O, Carswell F, Nobre A, Jarvis PG (2002) Acclimation of photosynthetic capacity to irradiance in tree canopies in relation to leaf nitrogen concentration and leaf mass per unit area. Plant Cell Environ 25:343–357Google Scholar
  23. Niinemets Ü, Tenhunen JD (1997) A model separating leaf structural and physiological effects on carbon gain along light gradients for the shade-tolerant species Acer saccharum. Plant, Cell Environ 20(7):845–866. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-133.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ogaya R, Peñuel ASJ (2003) Comparative seasonal gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of two dominant woody species in a Holm Oak Forest. Flora 198(2):132–141. doi:10.1078/0367-2530-00085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pokovai K, Kovacs GJ (2003) Development of crop models: a critical review. Novenytermeles 52:573–582Google Scholar
  26. Powles SB (1984) Photoinhibition of photosynthesis induced by visible light. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 35(1):15–44. doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.35.060184.000311 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pury DD, Farquhar GD (1997) Simple scaling of photosynthesis from leaves to canopies without the errors of big-leaf models. Plant Cell Environ 20(5):537–557. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1997.00094.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reddy AR, Chaitanya KV, Vivekanandan M (2004) Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. J Plant Physiol 161(11):1189–1202. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2004.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Roden J, Van Volkenburgh E, Hinckley TM (1990) Cellular basis for limitation of poplar leaf growth by water deficit. Tree Physiol 6(2):211–219. doi:10.1093/treephys/6.2.211 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Roper TR, Kennedy RA (1986) Photosynthetic characteristics during leaf development in bing sweet cherry. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 111(6):938–941Google Scholar
  31. Wang X, He W, Qu F, Feng X, Li C (2013) Effect of different cultivation patterns of blueberry on soil quality. Acta Agri Jiangxi 25(8):17–21 (in chinese) Google Scholar
  32. Yan Y, Fang S, Tian Y, Deng S, Tang L, Chuong DN (2015) Influence of tree spacing on soil nitrogen mineralization and availability in hybrid poplar plantations. Forests 6(3):636–649. doi:10.3390/f6030636 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qingqing Wu
    • 1
  • Yang Liu
    • 1
  • Shengzuo Fang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Pingping Li
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.College of ForestryNanjing Forestry UniversityNanjingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern ChinaNanjing Forestry UniversityNanjingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations