Journal of Forestry Research

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 145–153 | Cite as

Distribution changes of woody plants in Western Iran as monitored by remote sensing and geographical information system: a case study of Zagros forest

  • Mansour Karkon Varnosfaderani
  • Rasoul Kharazmi
  • Aliakbar Nazari Samani
  • Mohammad Reza Rahdari
  • Seid Hamid Matinkhah
  • Nasrollah Aslinezhad
Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

The status of woody plants in dry-land systems is a fundamental determinant of key ecosystem processes. Monitoring of this status plays an important role in understanding the dynamics of woody plants in arid and semi-arid ecosystems. The present study determined the dynamism of the Zagros forests in Iran using Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System techniques and statistical science. The results show that the density of trees varied from 10 to 53 % according to the physiographic and climatic conditions of semi-arid regions. The best and lowest correlation between vegetation indices and forest density were obtained for the global environmental monitoring index (GEMI; R 2 = 0.94) and soil adjust vegetation index (R 2 = 0.81), respectively. GEMI is used to monitor land use changes over a 10-year period. Results show that 2720 ha2 of forest have been destroyed by human interference and tillage on steep slopes during this period which also resulted in the loss of the fertile soil layer. GEMI determined the areas with a biomass of trees and could normally separate border regions with low biomass density of trees from regions without canopy cover. The results revealed that assessment of forest and vegetation cover in arid and semi-arid arduous forest regions using satellite digital numbers and ordinary sampling is subject to uncertainty. A stratified grouping procedure should be established to increase the accuracy of assessment.

Keywords

Monitoring Woody plants Vegetation index RS GIS Zagros forest Iran 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adina T, Anne C, Birgit K, Michael F (2014) Estimation of the seasonal leaf area index in an alluvial forest using high-resolution satellite-based vegetation indices. Remote Sens Environ 141:52–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed OS, Franklin SE, Wulder MA, White JC (2015) Characterizing stand-level forest canopy cover and height using landsat time series, samples of airborne LiDAR, and the random forest algorithm. ISPRSJ Photogramm Remote Sens 101:89–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Austin AT, Vivanco L (2006) Plant litter decomposition in a semi-arid ecosystem controlled by photo degradation. Nature 442(7102):555–558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey HP (1979) Semi-arid climates: their definition and distribution. Agriculture in semi-arid environments. Springer, Berlin, pp 73–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beadle NCW (1959) Some aspects of ecological research in semi-arid Australia. Biogeography and Ecology in Australia. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 452–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Béland M, Baldocchi DD, Widlowski JL, Fournier RA, Verstraete MM (2014) On seeing the wood from the leaves and the role of voxel size in determining leaf area distribution of forests with terrestrial LiDAR. Agric For Meteorol 184:82–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley BA, Mustard JF (2008) Comparisons of phenology trends by land cover class: a case study in the Great Basin, USA. Glob Chang Biol 14:334–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brandt JS, Kuemmerle T, Li H, Ren G, Zhu J, Radeloff VC (2012) Using Landsat imagery to map forest change in southwest China in response to the national logging ban and ecotourism development. Remote Sens Environ 121:358–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brantley ST, Zinnert JC, Young DR (2011) Application of hyperspectral vegetation indices to detect variations in high leaf area index temperate shrub thicket canopies. Remote Sens Environ 115(2):514–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Breshears D (2006) The grassland–forest continuum: trends in ecosystem properties for woody plant mosaics? Front Ecol Environ 4:96–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chaban LN. 2004. Theory and algorithms pattern recognition. Moscow State University of Geodesy and Cartography, in (Russian)Google Scholar
  12. Chen JM, Black TA (1991) Measuring leaf area index of plant canopies with branch architecture. Agric For Meteorol 57:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen JM, Cihlar J (1996) Retrieving leaf area index of boreal conifer forests using Landsat TM images. Remote Sens Environ 55:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen WB, Maiersperger TK, Gower ST, Turner DP (2003) An improved strategy for regression of biophysical variables and Landsat ETM + data. Remote Sens Environ 84:561–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colombo R, Bellingeri D, Fasolini D, Marino CM (2003) Retrieval of leaf area index in different vegetation types using high resolution satellite data. Remote Sens Environ 86(1):120–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coppin P, Jonckheere I, Nackaerts K, Muys B, Lambin E (2004) Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review. Int J Remote Sens 25(9):1565–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crippen RE (1990) Calculating the vegetation index faster. Remote Sens Environ 34:71–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Datt B (1999) A new reflectance index for remote sensing of chlorophyll content in higher plants: tests using Eucalyptus leaves. J Plant Physiol 154:30–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diouf A, Lambin EF (2001) Monitoring land-cover changes in semi-arid regions: remote sensing data and field observations in the Ferlo, Senegal. J Arid Environ 48(2):129–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferreira MP, Alves DS, Shimabukuro YE (2015) Forest dynamics and land-use transitions in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: the case of sugarcane expansion. Reg Environ Chang 15(2):365–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Franklin SE (2001) Remote sensing for sustainable forest management. CRC, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Galvao LS, dos Santos JR, Roberts DA, Breunig FM, Toomey M, de Moura YM (2011) On intra-annual EVI variability in the dry season of tropical forest: a case study with MODIS and hyperspectral data. Remote Sens Environ 115(9):2350–2359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ghanbari S, Sefidi K (2012) Comparison of sustainable forest management (SFM) trends at global and country levels: case study in Iran. J For Res 23(2):311–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Griffiths P, Kuemmerle T, Baumann M, Radeloff VC, Abrudan IV, Lieskovsky J, Hostert P (2014) Forest disturbances, forest recovery, and changes in forest types across the Carpathian ecoregion from 1985 to 2010 based on Landsat image composites. Remote Sens Environ 151:72–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heisler-White JL, Knapp AK, Kelly EF (2008) Increasing precipitation event size increases aboveground net primary productivity in a semi-arid grassland. Oecologia 158(1):129–140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Henareh Khalyani A, Falkowski MJ, Mayer AL (2012) Classification of landsat images based on spectral and topographic variables for land-cover change detection in Zagros forests. Int J Remote Sens 33(21):6956–6974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Henareh Khalyani J, Namiranian M, Heshmatol Vaezin SM, Feghhi J (2014) Development and evaluation of local communities incentive programs for improving the traditional forest management: a case study of Northern Zagros forests, Iran. J For Res 25(1):205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heumann BW, Seaquist JW, Eklundh L, Jonsson P (2007) AVHRR derived phenological change in the Sahel and Soudan, Africa, 1982–2005. Remote Sens Environ 108:385–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Homet-Gutiérrez P, Schupp EW, Gómez JM (2015) Naturalization of almond trees (Prunus dulcis) in semi-arid regions of the Western Mediterranean. J Arid Environ 113:108–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hostert P, Röder A, Hill J (2003) Coupling spectral unmixing and trend analysis for monitoring of long-term vegetation dynamics in Mediterranean rangelands. Remote Sens Environ 87:183–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huang CQ, Goward SN, Schleeweis K, Thomas N, Masek JG, Zhu ZL (2009) Dynamics of national forests assessed using the Landsat record: case studies in eastern United States. Remote Sens Environ 113:1430–1442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huete AR (1988) A Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI). Remote Sens Environ 25(3):295–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jian Y, Peter J, Nathan A (2012) Landsat remote sensing approaches for monitoring long-term tree cover dynamics in semi-arid woodlands: comparison of vegetation indices and spectral mixture analysis. Remote Sens Environ 119:62–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ko D, Bristow N, Greenwood D, Weisberg P (2009) Canopy cover estimation in semiarid woodlands: comparison of field-based and remote sensing methods. For Sci 55:132–141Google Scholar
  35. Lal R (2004) Carbon sequestration in dryland ecosystems. Environ Manag 33:528–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lanorte A, Lasaponara R, Lovallo M, Telesca L (2014) Fisher-Shannon information plane analysis of SPOT/VEGETATION Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) time series to characterize vegetation recovery after fire disturbance. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinform 26:441–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Le Maire G, Marsden C, Nouvellon Y, Grinand C, Hakamada R, Stape JL, Laclau JP (2011) MODIS NDVI time-series allow the monitoring of eucalyptus plantation biomass. Remote Sens Environ 115(10):2613–2625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Letnic M, Laffan SW, Greenville AC, Russell BG, Mitchell B, Fleming PJ (2015) Artificial watering points are focal points for activity by an invasive herbivore but not native herbivores in conservation reserves in arid Australia. Biodivers Conserv 24(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lillesand TM, Kiefer RW (1994) Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. Wiley, New York, p 750Google Scholar
  40. Macleod RD, Congalton RG (1998) A quantitative comparison of change-detection algorithms for monitoring eelgrass from remotely sensed data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 64(3):207–216Google Scholar
  41. Mashayekhi Z, Panahi M, Karami M, Khalighi S, Malekian A (2010) Economic valuation of water storage function of forest ecosystems (case study: Zagros Forests, Iran). J For Res 21(3):293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moosavi V, Vafakhah M, Shirmohammadi B, Behnia N (2013) A wavelet-ANFIS hybrid model for groundwater level forecasting for different prediction periods. Water Resour Manag 27(5):1301–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mutanga O, Skidmore AK (2004) Narrow band vegetation indices overcome the saturation problem in biomass estimation. Int J Remote Sens 25(19):3999–4014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Myneni RB, Keeling CD, Tucker CJ, Asrar G, Nemani RR (1997) Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature 386(6626):698–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Paruelo JM, Sala OE, Beltrán AB (2000) Long-term dynamics of water and carbon in semi-arid ecosystems: a gradient analysis in the Patagonian steppe. Plant Ecol 150(1–2):133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peters AJ, Walter-Shea EA, Ji L, Vina A, Hayes M, Svoboda MD (2002) Drought monitoring with NDVI-based standardized vegetation index. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 68(1):71–75Google Scholar
  47. Pinty B, Verstraete MM (1992) GEMI: a non-linear index to monitor global vegetation from satellites. Vegetation 101(1):15–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Potithep S, Nagai S, Nasahara KN, Muraoka H, Suzuki R (2013) Two separate periods of the LAI–VIs relationships using in situ measurements in a deciduous broadleaf forest. Agric For Meteorol 169:148–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pourhashemi M, Marvi Mohajer MR, Zobeiri M, Amiri GZ, Panahi P (2004) Identification of forest vegetation units in support of government management objectives in Zagros forests, Iran. Scand J For Res 19(S4):72–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Qi J, Chehbouni A, Huete AR, Kerr YH, Sorooshian S (1994) A modified soil adjusted vegetation index. Remote Sens Environ 48(2):119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rahmati O, Pourghasemi HR, Melesse AM (2016) Application of GIS-based data driven random forest and maximum entropy models for groundwater potential mapping: a case study at Mehran Region, Iran. CATENA 137:360–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Richards JA (1993) An introduction to remote sensing digital image analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, p 225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Riha KM, Michalski G, Gallo EL, Lohse KA, Brooks P, Meixner T (2014) High atmospheric nitrate inputs and nitrogen turnover in semi-arid urban catchments. Ecosystems 17(8):1309–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Roni R (2013) Surface temperature and NDVI generation and relation between them: application of remote sensing. Asian J Eng Technol Innov 1(1):08–13Google Scholar
  55. Rotenberg E, Yakir D (2010) Contribution of semi-arid forests to the climate system. Science 327(5964):451–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Rouse J 1974 Monitoring the Vernal Advancement and Retrogradation (Green Wave Effect) of Natural Vegetation NASA/GSFC Type III Final Report, Greenbelt, MD, 371pGoogle Scholar
  57. Sadeghravesh MH, Khosravi H, Ghasemian S (2015) Application of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for assessment of combating-desertification alternatives in central Iran. Nat Hazards 75(1):653–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Saranya KRL, Reddy CS, Rao PP, Jha CS (2014) Decadal time-scale monitoring of forest fires in Similipal Biosphere Reserve, India using remote sensing and GIS. Environ Monit Assess 186(5):3283–3296CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Schmidt M, Lucas R, Bunting P, Verbesselt J, Armston J (2015) Multi-resolution time series imagery for forest disturbance and regrowth monitoring in Queensland, Australia. Remote Sens Environ 158:156–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sexton JO, Song XP, Feng M, Noojipady P, Anand A, Huang C, Townshend JR (2013) Global, 30-m resolution continuous fields of tree cover: landsat-based rescaling of MODIS vegetation continuous fields with lidar-based estimates of error. Int J Digit Earth 6(5):427–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shirmohammadi B, Vafakhah M, Moosavi V, Moghaddamnia A (2013) Application of several data-driven techniques for predicting groundwater level. Water Resour Manag 27(2):419–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Singh A (1989) Review article digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. Int J Remote Sens 10(6):989–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Slayback DA, Pinzon JE, Los SO, Tucker CJ (2003) Northern hemisphere photosynthetic trends 1982–99. Glob Chang Biol 9:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Starr G, Staudhammer CL, Loescher HW, Mitchell R, Whelan A, Hiers JK, O’Brien JJ (2015) Time series analysis of forest carbon dynamics: recovery of Pinus palustris physiology following a prescribed fire. New For 46(1):63–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sulla-Menashe D, Kennedy RE, Yang Z, Braaten J, Krankina ON, Friedl MA (2014) Detecting forest disturbance in the Pacific Northwest from MODIS time series using temporal segmentation. Remote Sens Environ 151:114–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tang H, Brolly M, Zhao F, Strahler AH, Schaaf CL, Ganguly S, Dubayah R (2014) Deriving and validating Leaf Area Index (LAI) at multiple spatial scales through lidar remote sensing: a case study in Sierra National Forest, CA. Remote Sens Environ 143:131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Thenkabail PS, Lyon JG, Huete A (2016) Hyperspectral remote sensing of vegetation. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  68. Torahi AA, Rai SC (2011) Land cover classification and forest change analysis, using satellite imagery-a case study in Dehdez area of Zagros mountain in Iran. J Geogr Inf Syst 3(01):1Google Scholar
  69. Tucker CJ (1979) Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens Environ 8:127–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Walker BH (2012) Management of semi-arid ecosystems. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  71. Walker JJ, De Beurs KM, Wynne RH, Gao F (2012) Evaluation of Landsat and MODIS data fusion products for analysis of dryland forest phenology. Remote Sens Environ 117:381–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zehtabian G, Khosravi H, Ghodsi M (2010) High demand in a land of water scarcity: Iran. Water and Sustainability in Arid Regions. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zehtabian G, Khosravi H, Masoodi R (2014) Desertification assessment models (Criteria and indicators). University of Tehran Press, Iran (In Farsi), TehranGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhu Z, Woodcock CE, Olofsson P (2012) Continuous monitoring of forest disturbance using all available Landsat imagery. Remote Sens Environ 122:75–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mansour Karkon Varnosfaderani
    • 1
  • Rasoul Kharazmi
    • 2
  • Aliakbar Nazari Samani
    • 3
  • Mohammad Reza Rahdari
    • 3
  • Seid Hamid Matinkhah
    • 4
  • Nasrollah Aslinezhad
    • 5
  1. 1.State University of Land Use PlanningMoscowRussian Federation
  2. 2.St.Petersburg State UniversityPetersburgRussian Federation
  3. 3.Faculty of Natural ResourceUniversity of TehranKarajIran
  4. 4.Isfahan University of TechnologyIsfahanIran
  5. 5.Faculty of Water and SoilZabol UniversityZabolIran

Personalised recommendations