Advertisement

Journal of Forestry Research

, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 1191–1202 | Cite as

Does variable stand structure associated with multi-cohort forests support diversity of ground beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) communities in the central Nearctic boreal forest?

  • Erica P. Barkley
  • Jay R. Malcolm
  • Sandy M. SmithEmail author
  • M. Isabel Bellocq
Original Paper

Abstract

Multi-cohort management (MCM) that retains a range of stand structures (age and size class) has been proposed to emulate natural disturbance and improve management in the Nearctic boreal forest. Although MCM forests contain both single- and multi-aged stands of mixed tree sizes, little is known about how variable stand structure affects associated fauna and biodiversity. Here, we examine the relationship between ground beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) communities and stand characteristics across a range of forest structure (=cohort classes). Given that MCM classes are defined by the distribution of their tree–stem diameters, we ask whether parameters associated with these distributions (Weibull) could explain observed variation in carabid communities, and if so, how this compares to traditional habitat variables such as stand age, foliage complexity or volume of downed woody debris. We sampled carabids using weekly pitfall collections and compared these with structural habitat variables across a range of cohort classes (stand structure and age since disturbance) in 18 sites of upland mixed boreal forests from central Canada. Results showed that richness and diversity of carabid communities were similar among cohort classes. Weibull parameters from the diameter distribution of all stems were the strongest predictors of variation in carabid communities among sites, but vertical foliage complexity, understory thickness, and percentage of deciduous composition were also significant. The abundance of several carabid forest specialists was strongly correlated with tree canopy height, the presence of large trees, and high vertical foliage complexity. Our results demonstrate that variable forest structure, as expected under MCM, may be useful in retaining the natural range of ground beetle species across the central Nearctic boreal forest.

Keywords

Biodiversity conservation Boreal forest Carabidae Forest structure Ground beetles Multi-cohort management Tree diameter distribution 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank K. Ryan, C. Sharkey, B. Kuttner, M. Burrell, C. Darling, P. de Groot, N. Islam, H. Goulet, D. Swinson, D. Kearns, D. Maguire, and N. Revinskaya for their assistance. Funding was provided by the Forestry Futures Trust, Tembec, Inc., Lake Abitibi Model Forest, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and the University of Toronto.

References

  1. Attiwill PM (1994) The disturbance of forest ecosystems—the ecological basis for conservative management. For Ecol Manag 63:247–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey RL, Dell TR (1973) Quantifying diameter distributions with the Weibull function. For Sci 19:97–104Google Scholar
  3. Beaudry S, Duchesne LC, Cote B (1997) Short-term effects of three forestry practices on carabid assemblages in a jack pine forest. Can J For Res 27:2065–2071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergeron Y, Harvey B (1997) Basing silviculture on natural ecosystem dynamics: an approach applied to the southern boreal mixedwood forest of Quebec. For Ecol Manag 92:235–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergeron Y, Harvey B, Leduc A, Gauthier S (1999) Forest management guidelines based on natural disturbance dynamics: stand and forest-level considerations. For Chron 75:49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergeron Y, Gauthier S, Kafka V, Lefort P, Lesieur D (2001) Natural fire frequency for the eastern Canadian boreal forest: consequences for sustainable forestry. Can J For Res 31:384–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergeron Y, Drapeau P, Gauthier S, Lecomte N (2007) Using knowledge of natural disturbances to support sustainable forest management in the northern Clay Belt. For Chron 83:326–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buddle CM, Langor DW, Pohl GR, Spence JR (2006) Arthropod responses to harvesting and wildfire: implications for emulation of natural disturbance in forest management. Biol Conserv 128:346–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burrell MVA, Malcolm JR, Drapeau P (2013) Multi-cohort stand structure as a coarse filter of variation in mixedwood boreal bird communities. For Chron 89:327–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cobb TP, Langor DW, Spence JR (2007) Biodiversity and multiple disturbances: boreal forest ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) responses to wildfire, harvesting, and herbicide. Can J For Res 37:1310–1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Etheridge DA, Kayahara GJ (2013) Challenges and implications of incorporating multi-cohort management in northeastern Ontario, Canada: a case study. For Chron 89:315–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gove JH, Patil GP (1998) Modeling the basal area-size distribution of forest stands: a compatible approach. For Sci 44:285–297Google Scholar
  13. Haila Y, Hanski IK, Niemela J, Punttila P, Raivio S, Tukia H (1994) Forestry and the boreal fauna—matching management with natural forest dynamics. Ann Zool Fenn 31:187–202Google Scholar
  14. Harvey BD, Leduc A, Gauthier S, Bergeron Y (2002) Stand-landscape integration in natural disturbance-based management of the southern boreal forest. For Ecol Manag 155:369–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayden J, Kerley J, Carr D, Kenedi T, Hallarn J (1995) Ontario forest growth and yield program field manual for establishing and measuring permanent sample plots. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario Forest Research Institute, Sault Ste. MarieGoogle Scholar
  16. Humphrey JW, Hawes C, Peace AJ, Ferris-Kaan R, Jukes MR (1999) Relationships between insect diversity and habitat characteristics in plantation forests. For Ecol Manag 113:11–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Klimaszewski J, Langor DW, Work TT, Pelletier G, Hammond HEJ, Germain C (2005) The effects of patch harvesting and site preparation on ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in yellow birch dominated forests of southeastern Quebec. Can J For Res 35:2616–2628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Koivula M, Kukkonen J, Niemela J (2002) Boreal carabid-beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) assemblages along the clear-cut originated succession gradient. Biodivers Conserv 11:1269–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuttner BG (2006) Description, characterization and identification of stand structure classes in northeastern Ontario: the application of multi-cohort concepts in the classification of stands from four forest types to cohorts. Technical Report No. 3, Lake Abitibi Model Forest, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuttner BG, Malcolm JR, Smith SM (2013) Multi-cohort stand structure in boreal forests of northeastern Ontario: relationships with forest age, disturbance history, and deadwood features. For Chron 89:290–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lange M, Türke M, Pašalic E, Boch S, Hessenmöller D, Müller J, Prati D, Socher SA, Fischer M, Weisser WW, Gossner MM (2014) Effects of forest management on ground-dwelling beetles (Coleoptera; Carabidae, Staphylinidae) in Central Europe are mainly mediated by changes in forest structure. For Ecol Manag 329:166–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Larochelle A, Larivière MC (2003) A natural history of the ground-beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of America north of Mexico. Pensoft Publishers, SophiaGoogle Scholar
  23. Lassau SA, Hochuli DF, Cassis G, Reid CAM (2005) Effects of habitat complexity on forest beetle diversity: Do functional groups respond consistently? Divers Distrib 11:73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Latrémouille C, Valeria O, Harvey BD (2013) Historical analysis of landscape change in the eastern boreal mixedwood: a case study in the context of cohort-based management. For Chron 89:304–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lindroth CH (1961–1969) The ground beetles (Carabidae, excl. Cicindelinae) of Canada and Alaska, Parts 1–6. Opuscula Entomologica Supplementa 20, 24, 29, 33, 34, 35, LundGoogle Scholar
  26. Malcolm JR (1995) Forest structure and the abundance and diversity of neotropical small mammals. In: Lowman MD, Nadkarni NM (eds) Forest canopies. Academic, San Diego, pp 179–197Google Scholar
  27. Malcolm JR, Harvey BD (2013) The need for multi-cohort management in boreal forests. For Chron 89:271–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moore JD, Ouimet R, Houle D, Camire C (2004) Effects of two silvicultural practices on ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a northern hardwood forest, Quebec, Canada. Can J For Res 34:959–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Niemela J (1997) Invertebrates and boreal forest management. Conserv Biol 11:601–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Niemela J, Spence JR (1991) Distribution and abundance of an exotic ground-beetle (Carabidae)—a test of community impact. Oikos 62:351–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Niemela J, Langor D, Spence JR (1993) Effects of clear-cut harvesting on boreal ground-beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in western Canada. Conserv Biol 7:551–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Niemela J, Haila Y, Punttila P (1996) The importance of small-scale heterogeneity in boreal forests: variation in diversity in forest-floor invertebrates across the succession gradient. Ecography 19:352–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Niemela J, Spence JR, Carcamo H (1997) Establishment and interactions of carabid populations: an experiment with native and introduced species. Ecography 20:643–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Niemela J, Koivula M, Kotze DJ (2007) The effects of forestry on carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in boreal forests. J Insect Conserv 11:5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (2009) List of forest management units. OMNR website. http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/en/Business/Forests/1ColumnSubPage/STEL02_163535.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2009
  36. Paquin P (2008) Carabid beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) diversity in the black spruce succession of eastern Canada. Biol Conserv 141:261–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pearce J, Venier LA, Mckee J, Pedlar J, Mckenney D (2003) Influence of habitat and microhabitat on carabid (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages in four stand types. Can Entomol 135:337–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rowe JS (1972) Forest regions of Canada. Revised edition. Department of the Environment, Canadian Forestry Service, Publication No. 1300. Information Canada, Ottawa, p 172Google Scholar
  39. Saint-Germain M, Mauffette Y (2001) Reduced ground beetle activity following ice damage in maple stands of southwestern Quebec. For Chron 77:651–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sharkey CA (2008) Small mammal communities and multicohort stand structure in boreal northeastern Ontario. MScF Thesis, Faculty of Forestry, University of TorontoGoogle Scholar
  41. Spence JR, Langor DW, Niemela J, Carcamo HA, Currie CR (1996) Northern forestry and carabids: the case for concern about old-growth species. Ann Zool Fenn 33:173–184Google Scholar
  42. Thiele HU (1977) Carabid beetles in their environments: a study on habitat selection by adaptations in physiology and behaviour. In: Zoophysiology and ecology, vol 10. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  43. Van Wagner CE (1968) The line intercept method in forest fuel sampling. For Sci 14:20–26Google Scholar
  44. Vance CC, Nol E (2003) Temporal effects of selection logging on ground beetle communities in northern hardwood forests of eastern Canada. Ecoscience 10:49–56Google Scholar
  45. Vanderwel MC, Mills SC, Malcolm JR (2009) Effects of partial harvesting on vertebrate species associated with late-successional forests in Ontario’s boreal region. For Chron 85:91–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Werner SM, Raffa KF (2000) Effects of forest management practices on the diversity of ground-occurring beetles in mixed northern hardwood forests of the Great Lakes region. For Ecol Manag 139:135–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Work TT, Shorthouse DP, Spence JR, Volney WJA, Langor D (2004) Stand composition and structure of the boreal mixedwood and epigaeic arthropods of the Ecosystem Management Emulating Natural Disturbance (EMEND) landbase in northwestern Alberta. Can J For Res 34:417–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erica P. Barkley
    • 1
  • Jay R. Malcolm
    • 1
  • Sandy M. Smith
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Isabel Bellocq
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of ForestryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, IEGEBA (CONICET-UBA), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y NaturalesUniversidad de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations