Advertisement

Journal of Forestry Research

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 209–217 | Cite as

Evaluation of the post-fire erosion and flood control works in the area of Cassandra (Chalkidiki, North Greece)

  • Kastridis AristeidisEmail author
  • Kamperidou Vasiliki
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

We quantified morphological and hydrographical characteristics of two drainage basins (Chanioti and N. Skioni) on Cassandra peninsula of Chalkidiki (North Greece), and evaluated the effectiveness of post-fire flood and erosion control works. The drainage basins were chosen because of their severe damage by fire, post-fire potential for erosion and flood due to the steep relief, and the importance of the area for residential and tourism development. The first measures taken in the area after the fire were salvage cutting of burned trees, a total ban on grazing, and construction of three types of works, log erosion barriers (LEBs), log check dams and contour branch barriers. Almost all necessary post-fire works were completed in both catchments but many construction failures were recorded. Approximately 75 % of the LEBs and 45 % of the contour branch barriers functioned properly, while the remainder failed. Nearly 80 % of the log dams were sedimented to 0–20 % of the dam height, 14.3 % were 20–40 % filled and 5.9 % collapsed. Despite these failures, peak discharge declined by 10.5 % in Chanioti and 20.4 % in N. Skioni catchment. The main reasons for works failures were the rush of construction and the limited supervision of workers, which resulted in floods during the years that followed.

Keywords

Erosion Catchment Contour branch barrier Flood Log erosion barrier Post-fire management 

References

  1. Baloutsos G, Economou Α, Kaoukis Κ (2007) The post-fire flood risk of drainage basins. In: Proceedings of scientific conference: recovery of burnt areas, Athens, 13–14 Dec 2001, pp 79–104Google Scholar
  2. Beatty MS, Smith EJ (2010) Fractional wettability and contact angle dynamics in burned water repellent soils. J Hydrol 391(1–2):97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. CORINE, Corine land cover (2000) European environment agency (EEA). http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/corine-land-cover-2000-clc2000-seamless-vector-database
  4. Fox D (2011) Evaluation of the efficiency of some sediment trapping methods after a Mediterranean forest fire. J Environ Manag 92:258–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hellenic Military Geographical Service (H.M.G.S.) (1971) Topographical maps 1:50000 scale. www.gys.gr
  6. Institute of Geological and Mineral Exploration (Ι.G.Μ.Ε.) (1993) Geotechnical map of Greece 1:500000 scale. Institute of geological and mineral exploration, AthensGoogle Scholar
  7. Kotoulas D (2001) Mountainous hydronomy, volume 1: the flowing water. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, pp 1–15 (in Greek)Google Scholar
  8. Lewis S, Robichaud P, Frazier B, Wu J, Laes D (2008) Using hyperspectral imagery to predict post-wildfire soil water repellency. Geomorphology 95:192–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Μaris F, Iliadis L, Marinos D (2004) Estimation of the torrential risk of Rodopi mountainous watersheds by a fuzzy decision support system: the case of trapezoidal membership function and fuzzy conjunction. http://www.srcosmos.gr/srcosmos/showpub.aspx?aa=6047
  10. Mataix-Solera J, Arcenegui V, Tessler N, Zornoza R, Wittenberg L, Martínez C, Caselles P, Pérez-Bejarano A, Malkinson D, Jordán MM (2013) Soil properties as key factors controlling water repellency in fire-affected areas: evidences from burned sites in Spain and Israel. Catena 108:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Raftoyannis Y, Spanos I (2005) Evaluation of log and branch barriers as post-fire rehabilitation treatments in a Mediterranean pine forest in Greece. Int J Wildland Fire 14:183–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Robichaud P (2000) Fire effects on infiltration rates after prescribed fire in Northern Rocky Mountain forests, USA. J Hydrol 231–232:220–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Robichaud P, Pierson F, Brown R, Wagenbrenner J (2008a) Measuring effectiveness of three postfire hillslope erosion barrier treatments, western Montana, USA. Hydrol Process 22(2):159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Robichaud P, Wagenbrenner J, Brown R, Wohlgemuth M, Beyers J (2008b) Evaluating the effectiveness of contour-felled log erosion barriers as a post-fire runoff and erosion mitigation treatment in the western United States. Int J Wildland Fire 17:255–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tessler N, Wittenberg L, Malkinson D, Greenbaum N (2008) Fire effects and short-term changes in soil water repellency—Mt. Carmel, Israel. Catena 74(3):185–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wagenbrenner JW, MacDonald LH, Rough D (2006) Effectiveness of three post-fire rehabilitation treatments in the Colorado Front Range. Hydrol Process 20:2989–3006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Water in Core (2011) Sustainable water management through common responsibility enhancement in Mediterranean river basins. Anthemountas river basin. (E.U. project 1G-MED08-515)Google Scholar
  18. Wohlgemuth P, Hubbert K, Robichaud P (2001) The effects of log erosion barriers on post-fire hydrologic response and sediment yield in small forested watersheds, southern California. Hydrol Process 15:3053–3066CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Mountainous Water Management Control, Faculty of Forestry and Natural EnvironmentAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessaloníkiGreece
  2. 2.Laboratory of Wood Products and Furniture Technology, Faculty of Forestry and Natural EnvironmentAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessaloníkiGreece

Personalised recommendations