Advertisement

Journal of Forestry Research

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 653–658 | Cite as

Morphological parameters and genetic diversity of progenies from seed production areas and unimproved stands of teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) in India

  • N. LyngdohEmail author
  • Geeta Joshi
  • G. Ravikanth
  • R. Vasudeva
  • R. Uma Shaanker
Original Paper
  • 144 Downloads

Abstract

We compared morphological and genetic attributes of progeny obtained from three seed production areas (SPAs) and three corresponding unimproved stands (UIS) of teak (Tectona grandis L.f) at three broad teak growing regions in the state of Karnataka, India. In general, seed morphological parameters such as seed weight, seed size and seed emptiness were significantly superior in SPAs compared to UISs. Seed germination percentage was also higher in seeds from SPAs. Seedling performance measured at two monthly intervals for six months was observed to be superior in SPAs at two of the three regions compared. Although the genetic diversity of progeny of SPAs was lower than UIS at all regions, the values were moderately high. Germination percent was positively correlated with fruit weight and kernel weight per seed, while diversity indices were negatively correlated with fruit weight, fruit diameter and kernel weight per seed. SPAs proved important as a source of moderately improved planting material with no severe threat to the genetic diversity of future plantations.

Key words

ISSR tree improvement Shannon index teak plantations percent polymorphism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams WT, Zuo J, Shimizu JY, Tappeiner JC. 1998. Impact of alternative regeneration methods on genetic diversity in coastal Douglas-fir. Forest Science, 44: 390–396Google Scholar
  2. Anthony F, Bertrand B, Quiros O, Wilches A, Lashermes P, Bertaud J, Charrier A. 2001. Genetic diversity of wild coffee (Coffea arabica L.) using molecular markers. Euphytica, 118: 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banik RL. 1977. Studies on grading of Teak fruits: 1 Fruit size is a factor in germination of teak seeds. Bano Bigyan Patrika, 6(1): 1–7.Google Scholar
  4. Chacko KC, John SK, Asokan AM. 1997. Evaluation of some pre-sowing treatments for germination of teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) fruits. Annals of Forestry, 5(1): 55–56.Google Scholar
  5. Chandrasekharan C. 2005. Qualities of teak and some policy issues. In: Bhat K.M., Nair K.K.N., Bhat K.V., Muralidharan E.M. and Sharma J.K. (eds.), Quality Timber Products of Teak from Sustainable Forest Management, International conference held between 2–5 December 2003 at Peechi, India, pp.219–227.Google Scholar
  6. Changtragoon S, Szmidt AE. 2000. Genetic diversity of teak (Tectona grandis Linn. F.) in Thailand revealed by Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD), In: IUFRO Working Party 2.08.01 Troplical Species Breeding and Genetic Resources: Forest Genetics for the Next Millennium. International Conferences Centre, Durban, South Africa. 8–13 October 2000. pp. 82–83.Google Scholar
  7. Dabral SL. 1976. Emptiness in Teak (Tectona grandis L.) fruits. Indian Forester, 102(4): 247–253.Google Scholar
  8. Doyle JJ, Doyle JS. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh tissues. Phytochemical Bulletin, 19: 11–15.Google Scholar
  9. Eidmann FE. 1934. Germination of Teak (Tectona grandis L. f). Tectona, 27(4): 233–287.Google Scholar
  10. Ganeshaiah KN, Uma Shaanker R. 1988. Embryo abortion in wind dispersed pods of Dalbergia sissoo: maternal regulation or sibling rivalry?. Oecologia, 77: 135–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harwood CE, Nikles D, Pomeroy GP, Robson KA. 1996. Impact of thinning via phenotypic selection on the genetic base of planted seed production areas. In: Dieters M.J., Matheson A.C., Nikles D.G., Harwood C.E. and Walker S.M. (eds.), Tree improvement for sustainable tropical forestry: Proceedings of QFRI-IUFRO conference, Caloundra, 27 Oct.–1 Nov, pp.148–153Google Scholar
  12. Hedegart T. 1973. Pollination of teak (Tectona grandis L.). Silvae Genetica, 22: 124–128.Google Scholar
  13. Huf A, Dybing CD. 1980. Factors affecting shedding of flowers in soyabean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill)]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 31: 751–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Indira EP, Basha SC. 1999. Effect of seeds from different sources on germination and growth in teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) nursery. Annals of Forestry, 7(1): 39–44.Google Scholar
  15. Indira EP, Mohanandas K. 2002. Intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting pollination and fruit productivity in teak (Tectona grandis L.f.). Indian Journal of Genetics, 62(3): 208–214.Google Scholar
  16. Jackson DI, Sweet GB. 1972. Flower initiation in temperate woody plants. Horticulture Abstract, 42: 9–24.Google Scholar
  17. Jayasankar S, Babu LC, Sudhakara K, Kumar PD. 1999. Evaluation of provenances for seedling attributes in teak (Tectona grandis Linn. F.). Silvae Genetica, 48(3–4): 115–122.Google Scholar
  18. Karmacharya SB, Singh KP. 1992. Production and nutrient dynamics of reproductive components of teak trees in dry tropics. Tree Physiology, 11: 357–368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kedharnath S, Matthews JD. 1962. Improvement of teak by selection and breeding. Indian Forester, 88(4): 277–284.Google Scholar
  20. Kjaer ED, Suangtho V. 1997. A review of the tree improvement plan for teak in Thailand. Report, Royal Forest Department, Thailand and Danida Forest Seed Centre, Denmark.Google Scholar
  21. Lyngdoh N, Joshi G, Ravikanth G, Uma Shaanker R, Vasudeva R. 2010. Influence of levels of genetic diversity on fruit quality in Teak (Tectona grandis L.f.). Current Science, 99(5): 639–644.Google Scholar
  22. Lyngdoh N, Gunaga RP, Joshi G, Vasudeva R, Ravikanth G, Uma Shaanker R. 2012. Influence of geographic distance and genetic dissimilarity among clones on flowering synchrony in a teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f) clonal seed orchard. Silvae Genetica, 61(1–2): 10–17.Google Scholar
  23. Medri C, Ruas PM, Higa AR, Murakami M, de Fatima Raus C. 2003. Effects of forest management on the genetic diversity in a population of Araucaria angustifolia (bert.) O. Kuntze. Silvae Genetica, 52: 202–205.Google Scholar
  24. Mohanan C, Chacko KC, Chandran A, Varma G. 2005. Seed health problems in tropical forest tree seeds and their impact on seedling production. Avalaible at: http://www.metla.fi/julkaisut/workingpapers/2005/mwp011.htm Google Scholar
  25. Mutnal SM, Patil SJ, Hosalli RB, Nadagoudar BS. 2003. Effect of tree age and diameter on germination of teak. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 16(3): 481–484.Google Scholar
  26. Nicodemus A, Nagarajan B, Narayanan C, Varghese M. 2005. RAPD variation in Indian teak populations and its implications for breeding and conservation. In: Bhat K.M., Nair K.K.N., Bhat K.V., Muralidharan E.M. and Sharma J.K. (eds.), Quality Timber Products of Teak from Sustainable Forest Management, International conference held between 2–5 December 2003 at Peechi, India. pp.189–201Google Scholar
  27. Palupi ER, Owens JN. 1998. Reproductive phenology and reproductive success of teak (Tectona grandis L.f). International Journal of Plant Sciences, 159(5): 833–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pandey D, Brown C. 2000. Teak: a global review. Unasylva, 51: 3–13.Google Scholar
  29. SFR (State Forest Report). 2009. Forest Survey of India, Dehra Dun, 199ppGoogle Scholar
  30. Sivakumar V, Parthiban KT, Gurudev Singh B, Gnanambal VS, Anandalakshmi R, Geeth S. 2002. Variability in drupe characters and their relationship on seed germination in Teak (Tectona grandis L.f.). Slivae Genetica, 51: 232–237.Google Scholar
  31. Sudhakaran K, Jijeesh CM. 2008. Effect of germination conditions, grading and storage of teak (Tectona grandis Linn. f.) drupes on the germination parameters. Indian Forester, 124(2): 241–249.Google Scholar
  32. Tamas IA, Wallace DH, Ludford PM, Ozbun JL. 1979. Effect of older fruits on aborting and abscisic acid concentration of younger fruits in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Plant Physiology, 64: 620–622.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Toon PG, Haines RJ, Dieters MJ. 1990. Relationship between seed weight, germination and seedling height growth in Pinus caribaea, Morele. Var. hondurensis barre and Golfri. Seed Science and Technology, 19(2): 389–402.Google Scholar
  34. Varghese M, Kamalakannan R, Nagarajan B, Lindgren D. 2008. Fertility variation and its impact on seed crops in seed production areas and a natural stand of teak in southern India. Euphytica, 160: 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wellendorf H, Kaosa-ard A. 1988. Teak improvement strategy in Thailand. Forest Tree Improvement, 21: 1–43.Google Scholar
  36. Wendell JF, Weeden NF. 1989. Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. Isozymes in Plant Biology, 4: 5–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yanchuk AD. 2001. A quantitative framework for breeding and conservation of forest tree genetic resources in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31: 566–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yeh FCH, Boyle TJB. 1997. POPGENE Version 1.2 Microsoft window-based software for population genetics analysis. Alberta: University of Alberta, p.505.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Lyngdoh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Geeta Joshi
    • 1
  • G. Ravikanth
    • 2
    • 4
  • R. Vasudeva
    • 5
  • R. Uma Shaanker
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Tree Improvement and Propagation DivisionInstitute of Wood Sciences and TechnologyBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.School of Ecology and ConservationUniversity of Agricultural SciencesBangaloreIndia
  3. 3.Department of Crop PhysiologyUniversity of Agricultural SciencesBangaloreIndia
  4. 4.Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the EnvironmentRoyal EnclaveSrirampura, Jakkur PostIndia
  5. 5.Department of Forest Biology and Tree ImprovementCollege of ForestrySirsiIndia

Personalised recommendations