Journal of Forestry Research

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 399–404 | Cite as

Diversity and regeneration status of Sarkot Van Panchyat in Garhwal Himalaya, India

  • Nazir A. Pala
  • A. K. Negi
  • Yogesh Gokhale
  • Jahangeer A. Bhat
  • N. P. Todaria
Original Paper


We investigated the floristic composition, phytosociological and regeneration status of Sarkot Van Panchyat (community forest) in Chamoli district of Garhwal Himalaya. A total of 52 plant species of 46 genera and 26 families were recorded, which included 12 trees, 18 shrubs and 22 herb species. Quercus leucotrichophora was dominant tree species in sapling and seedling layers, followed by Lyonia ovalifolia and Rhododendron arboreum. Out of 12 tree species, 7 species in seedling stage and 8 species in sapling stage were recorded in the study area. The 44.41% species in the study area showed good regeneration status, 16.66% species were fairly regenerating, and 8.33% species showed poor regeneration status, while 33% species were not regenerating. Number of individuals from lower girth classes (0–10 cm and 10–30 cm) showed decreasing trend with the increase in size of girth class. Shannon index (H) for trees, shrubs and herbs was recorded as 1.82, 2.24 and 2.41 respectively. Simpsons index (CD) was recorded as 0.21, 0.12 and 0.12 for trees, shrubs and herbs respectively. The forest should be divided into compartments for better management purpose and each compartment should be closed for five years to assist regeneration and enrichment planting may also be carried out for sustainable management.


traditional forests regeneration dominant Garhwal Himalaya composition 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Atkinson ET. 1882. Gazetteer, North West Province: The Himalayan Districts of the North Western Provinces of India. North Western Provinces: Oudh Government Press, p. 266.Google Scholar
  2. Barik SK, Tripathi RS, Pandey HN, Rao P. 1996. Tree regeneration in a subtropical humid forest: effect of cultural disturbance on seed production, dispersal and germination. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33: 1551–1560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkes F. 2008-Community Conserved Areas: Policy issues in historic and contemporary context. Conservation Letters, 2(1): 20–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Canham CD, Marks PL. 1985. The response of woody plants to disturbance patterns of establishment and growth. In: Pickett, S.T.A. and White, P.S. (eds), The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics.. New York: New York Academic Press, p. 567Google Scholar
  5. Curtis JT, Cottam G. 1956. Plant Ecology Workbook. Laboratory field reference manual. Minnesota: Burgers Publication Co, p. 193.Google Scholar
  6. Curtis JT, McIntosh RP. 1950. The interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic phytosociological characters. Ecology, 31: 434–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gaur RD. 1999. Flora of the district Garhwal North West. Srinagar (Garhwal)-U.P., India: Transmedia, p. 1–100.Google Scholar
  8. Greig-Smith P. 1957. Quantitative Plant Ecology. Butterworth, London: Cambridge University Press, p. 233.Google Scholar
  9. Hannah L, Bowles I. 1995. Letters: global priorities. Bioscience, 45: 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Khan ML, Raj JPN, Tripathi RS. 1987a. Regeneration and survival of tree seedlings and sprouts in tropical deciduous and subtropical forests of Meghalaya, India. Forest Ecology and Management, 14: 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Khan ML, Raj JPN, Tripathi RS. 1987b. Population structure of some tree species in disturbed and protected sub-tropical forests of North East India. Acta Oecologia: Oecologia Applicata, 8: 247–255.Google Scholar
  12. Knight DH. 1963. A distance method for constructing forest profile diagrams and obtaining structural data. Tropical Ecology, 4: 89–94.Google Scholar
  13. Kumar M, Joshi M, Todaria NP. 2010. Regeneration status of a sub-tropical Anogeissus latifolia forest in Garhwal Himalaya, India. Journal of Forestry Research, 21(4): 439–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kumar M, Rajwar GS, Shrama CM. 2004. Disturbance and dynamics in the subtropical forests of Garhwal Himalaya. Bulletin of the National Institute of Ecology, 14: 43–50.Google Scholar
  15. Kumar M, Sharma CM, Rajwar GS. 2005. The stability and diversity patterns of vegetation in tropical foot hill forest along disturbance gradient in Garhwal Himalaya. Annals of Forestry, 13(1): 84–92.Google Scholar
  16. Negi BS, Chauhan DS, Todaria NP. 2008. Inventory of species richness of panchyats and adjoining reserve forests in three districts of Garhwal Himalaya, India. Tropical Ecology, 49(2): 121–129.Google Scholar
  17. Pande PK, Negi JDS, Sharma SC. 2001. Plant species diversity and vegetation analysis in moist temperate Himalayan forest. Indian Journal of Forestry, 24(4): 456–470.Google Scholar
  18. Pande PK, Negi JDS, Sharma SC. 2002. Plant species diversity, composition, gradient analysis and regeneration behaviour of some tree species in a moist temperate western Himalayan forest ecosystem. Indian Forester, 128(8): 869–889.Google Scholar
  19. Pant GB. 1922. The forest problems of Kumaun. Allahabad: Government Press, pp. 40–45Google Scholar
  20. Primack RB, Hall P. 1992. Biodiversity and forest change in Malaysian Borneo. Bioscience, 42: 829–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rawat RS. 2005. Studies on interrelationship of woody vegetation density and soil characteristics along altitudinal gradient in a montane forest of Garhwal Himalays. Indian Forester, 131(8): 990–994.Google Scholar
  22. Richards PW. 1996. The Tropical Rain Forest: An Ecological Study. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 575Google Scholar
  23. Rikhari HC, Singh RS, Tripathi SK. 1991. Pattern of species distribution, community characters and regeneration in major forest communities along an elevational gradient in central Himalaya. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Science, 17(3): 167–174.Google Scholar
  24. Saxena AK, Singh JS. 1982. A phytosociological analysis of woody species in forest communities of Kumaoun Himalaya. Vegetatio, 50: 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shannon CE, Wiener W. 1963. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, p. 117.Google Scholar
  26. Simpson EH. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163: 688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Singh JS, Yadav PS. 1974. Seasonal variation in composition plant biomass and net primary productivity of tropical grassland at Kurukshetra. India. Ecology Monograph, 44: 351–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Taylor AH, Zisheng Q. 1988. Regeneration patterns in old growth Abies -Betula forests in the Wolong natural reserve, Sichuan, China. Journal of Ecology, 76: 1204–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Uma Shankar R. 2001. A case of high tree diversity in a Sal (Shorea robusta) dominated lowland forest of Eastern Himalaya: Floristic composition, regeneration and conservation. Current Science, 81: 776–786.Google Scholar
  30. Whitemore TC. 1984. Tropical rain forest dynamics and its implications for management. In: Gomez-Pompa, A., Whitemore, T.C. and Hadley, M. (eds), Rain Forest Regeneration and Management. Man and Biosphere Series 6. Paris: The Parthenon Publishing Group, p. 457.Google Scholar
  31. Wilson EO. 1985. The biological diversity crises. Bioscience, 35: 700–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nazir A. Pala
    • 1
  • A. K. Negi
    • 1
  • Yogesh Gokhale
    • 2
  • Jahangeer A. Bhat
    • 1
  • N. P. Todaria
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forestry and Natural ResourcesChauras Campus HNB Garhwal University Srinagar Garhwal UttarakhandSrinagarIndia
  2. 2.The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) New Delhi-Darbari Seth BlockNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations