Advertisement

Journal of Forestry Research

, 22:611 | Cite as

Seed storage behavior of Knema attenuata, an endemic species of Western Ghats, India

  • Vinayachandra
  • K. R. ChandrashekarEmail author
Original Paper
  • 179 Downloads

Abstract

We performed desiccation and storage trials to better understand storage behavior of Knema attenuata seeds. Mature seeds with moisture content (MC) of 31% exhibited 73% germination. During the period of desiccation (open lab condition) seeds with MC 23% showed 40% germination. After further drying to MC 21% germination was reduced to 16%. Complete loss in viability resulted when seed moisture was reduced to 18%. The seeds stored at -10°C, 0°C, 10°C and 28±2°C (open lab condition) lost their viability within 10 days. Seeds stored in sealed polythene bags and moist sand retained viability for more days than did seeds stored under all other storage conditions. Sensitivity of seeds to lower temperature and desiccation suggest that the storage behavior of K. attenuata seeds is recalcitrant. Seeds stored in moist conditions can, at best, be stored for a period of two months.

Keywords

desiccation germination Knema attenuata recalcitrant storage viability Vinayachandra 

References

  1. Anil Kumar C, Babu KP, Krishnan PN. 2002. Seed storage and viability of Myristica malabarica Lam. an endemic species of Southern Western Ghats (India). Seed Sci Technol, 30: 651–657.Google Scholar
  2. Anil Kumar C, Jacob T, Pushpangadan P. 1996. Storage and germination of seeds of Aporusa lindleyana (wight) Baillon an economically important plant of Western Ghats (India). Seed Sci & Technol, 25: 1–6.Google Scholar
  3. Baskin C, Baskin JM. 2001. Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography and Evolution of Dormancy and germination. United States: Academic press, p.247.Google Scholar
  4. Berjak P, Farrant JM, Mycock DJ, Pammenter NW. 1989. Homoiohydrous (recalcitrant) seeds: the enigma of their desiccation sensitivity and state of water in axes of landolphia kirkii Dyer. Planta, 186: 249–261.Google Scholar
  5. Chaitanya KSK, Naithani SC. 1994. Role of superoxide, lipid peroxidation and superoxide dismutase in membrane perturbation during loss of viability in seeds of Shorea robusta Gaertn. New Phytol, 126: 623–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaitanya KSK, Naithaniand R, Naithani SC. 2000b. Ascorbic acid metabolism in ageing recalcitrant sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn.f.) seeds. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, 38: 1031–1035.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chaitanya KSK, Keshavakanth S, Naithani SC. 2000a. Changes in total protein and rotease activity in sal (Shorea robusta) seeds. Silva Fennica, 34: 71–77.Google Scholar
  8. Chaitanya SK, Naithani SC. 1998. Kinetin mediated prolongation of viability in recalcitrant sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn. f.) seeds at low temperature: Role of kinetin in delaying membrane deterioration during desiccation induced injury. J Plant Growth Regulation, 17: 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chin HF, Aziz M, Ang BB, Hamsah S. 1981. The effect of moisture content and temperature on the ultra structure and viability of seeds of Hevea brasiliensis. Seed Sci & Technol, 9: 411–422.Google Scholar
  10. Corbineau F, Come D. 1986. Experiments on the storage of seeds and seedlings of Symphonia globulifera L.f.(Guttiferae). Seed Sci & Technol, 14: 585–591.Google Scholar
  11. Hong TD, Ellis RH. 1996. A protocol to determine seed storage behavior. IPGRI Technical Bulletin No. 1. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  12. International Seed Testing Association. 1999. Trees and Shrub seeds handbook. Zurich: International seed testing association,.Google Scholar
  13. Jorgenson J. 1990. Conservation of valuable gene resources by cryopreservation in some forest tree species. J Plant Physiol, 136: 373–376.Google Scholar
  14. King MW, Roberts EH. 1980. Maintenance of recalcitrant seeds in storage. In: Chin H.F. and E.H. Roberts (Ed.) Recalcitrant Crop Seeds. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Tropical Press SDN.BDH, pp. 53–89.Google Scholar
  15. Madhusudanan KN, Babu V. 1994. Recalcitrancy, viability and germination of nutmeg seeds. Journal of Plantation Crops, 22: 25–29.Google Scholar
  16. Ng FSP. 1978. Strategies of establishment in Malayan forest trees. In: P.B. Tomlinson & M.H. Zimmermann (Ed.) Tropical Trees as Living Systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 129–162.Google Scholar
  17. Pammenter NW, Berjak P, Farrant JM, Smith MT, Ross G. 1994. Why do stored, hydrated recalcitrant seeds die? Seed Science Research, 4: 187–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rajeswari Dayal B, Kaveriappa KM. 2000. Effect of desiccation and temperature on germination and vigour of the seeds of Hopea parviflora Beddome and H. ponga(Dennst.) Mabb. Seed Sci & Technol, 28: 497–506.Google Scholar
  19. Ravi Kumar K, Ved DK. 2000. One hundred red listed medicinal plants of conservation concern in Southern India. Bangalore, India: FRLHT.Google Scholar
  20. Roberts EH. 1973. Predicting the storage life of seeds. Seed Sci Technol, 1: 499–514.Google Scholar
  21. Sangakkara UR. 1993. Effect of Time of Harvest and Storage Conditions on germination of Nutmeg (Myristica fragrans Houtt), Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 170: 97–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schmidt L. 2000. Guide to Handling of Tropical and Subtropical Forest Seed. Humlebaek, Denmark: Danida Forest Seed Centre, p.511.Google Scholar
  23. Tompsett PB. 1992. A review of the literature on storage of dipterocarp seeds. Seed Sci & Technol, 20: 251–267.Google Scholar
  24. Wesley-Smith J, Vertucci CW, Berjak P, Pammenter NW, Crane J. 1992. Cryopreservation of desiccation-sensitive axes of Camellia sinensis in relation to dehydration, freezing rate and the thermal properties of tissue water. J Plant Physiol, 140: 596–604.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department Applied BotanyMangalore UniversityMangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations