Allometric prediction of above-ground biomass of eleven woody tree species in the Sudanian savanna-woodland of West Africa
Allometric models are necessary for estimating biomass in terrestrial ecosystems. Generalized allometric relationship exists for many tropical trees, but species- and region-specific models are often lacking. We developed species-specific allometric models to predict aboveground biomass for 11 native tree species of the Sudanian savanna-woodlands. Diameters at the base and at breast height, with species means ranging respectively from 11 to 28 cm and 9 to 19 cm, and the height of the trees were used as predictor variables. Sampled trees spanned a wide range of sizes including the largest sizes these species can reach. As a response variable, the biomass of the trees was obtained through destructive sampling of 4 754 trees during wood harvesting. We used a stepwise multiple regression analysis with backward elimination procedure to develop models separately predicting, total biomass of the trees, stem biomass, and biomass of branches and twigs. All species-specific regression models relating biomass with measured tree dimensions were highly significant (p < 0.001). The biomass of branches and twigs was less predictable compared to stem biomass and total biomass, although their models required fewer predictors and predictor interactions. The best-fit equations for total above-ground biomass and stem biomass had R 2 > 0.70, except for the Acacia species; for branches including twig biomass, R2-values varied from 0.749 for Anogeissus leiocarpa to 0.183 for Acacia macrostachya. The use of these equations in estimating available biomass will avoid destructive sampling, and aid in planning for sustainable use of these species.
Keywordsallometry above-ground biomass indigenous woody species linear regression site specific equation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Aboal JR, Arevalo JR, Fernandez A. 2005. Allometric relationships of different tree species and stand above ground biomass in the Gomera laurel forest (Canary Islands). Flora, 200: 264–274.Google Scholar
- Arbonnier M. 2004. Trees, shrubs and lianas of West African dry zones. CIRAD Margraf, GMBH, MNHN, Paris, France.Google Scholar
- Bellefontaine R, Gaston A, Petrucci Y. 2000. Management of natural forests of dry tropical zones. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
- Brown S, Gillespie AJ, Lugo AE. 1989. Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. Forest Science, 35: 881–902.Google Scholar
- Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S, Cairns MA, Chambers JQ, Eamus D, Fölster H, Fromard F, Higuchi N, Kira T, Lescure JP, Nelson BW, Ogawa H, Puig H, Riera B, Yamakura T. 2005. Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia, 145: 87–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crawley MJ. 2005. Statistics: An introduction using R. Chister, England: John Wiley & Sons,.Google Scholar
- Faraway JJ. 2005. Extending Linear Model With R: Generalized Linear, Mixed Effects and Nonparametric Regression Models. Taylor & Francis Ltd, Boca Raton, Fla USA.Google Scholar
- Nouvellet Y. 1993. Evolution d’un taillis de formation naturelle en zone soudano-sahélienne au Burkina Faso. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques, 237: 45–60.Google Scholar
- Smektala G, Hautdidier B, Gautier D, Peltier R, Njiemoun A. 2002. Construction de tarifs de biomasse pour l’évaluation de la disponibilité ligneuse en zone de savanes au Nord-Cameroun. Actes du colloque, 27–31Google Scholar
- Mai 2002, Garoua, Cameroun. Stromgaard P. 1985. Biomass estimation equations for miombo woodland, Zambia. Agroforestry Systems, 3: 3–13.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. 1996. Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.Google Scholar