Journal of Forestry Research

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 331–337 | Cite as

Effects of slope aspects on forest compositions, community structures and soil properties in natural temperate forests of Garhwal Himalaya

  • C.M. Sharma
  • N.P. Baduni
  • Sumeet Gairola
  • S.K. Ghildiyal
  • Sarvesh Suyal
Original Paper

Abstract

The present study was undertaken in seven natural forest types of temperate zone (1500 to 3100 m, a.s.l.) of Garhwal Himalaya to understand the effects of slope aspects viz., north-east (NE), north-west (NW), south-east (SE) and south-west (SW), on the forest structure, composition and soil characteristics of each selected forest type. The sample plots in each forest type were laid out by using stratified random approach. The indices i.e., the Importance Value Index, Shannon-Wiener diversity index, Simpson’s concentration of Dominance, Simpson diversity index, Pielou equitability and Margalef species richness index were calculated statistically using standard softwares to elucidate the differences in forest structure and composition of forest types on different slope aspects of the sites. The composite soil samples were taken from each forest stand and the physico-chemical properties of the soil i.e., moisture content (MC), water holding capacity (WHC), pH, organic carbon (OC), phosphorus (P), potassium (K) and available nitrogen (N) were analyzed. The results show that the higher values of total basal cover (74.4 m2·ha−1 in Quercus semecarpifolia forest), Concentration of dominance (0.85 in Pinus roxburghii forest) and Tree diversity (1.81 in Quercus floribunda forest) in the forests were recorded in the northern aspects. MC (40.8% in Quercus leucotrichophora forest), WHC (48.9% in Cupressus torulosa forest), OC (3.8% in Cedrus deodara forest), P (31.9 kg·ha−1 in Quercus leucotrichophora forest) and N (1.0% in Pinus roxburghii forest) had also higher values in the soils of northern aspects. Consequently the higher productivity of the forests was also noticed on the northern aspects.

Keywords

diversity stem density forest composition aspects soil nutrients 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baduni NP, Sharma CM. 1997. Flexibility fitness compromise in some moist temperate forests of Garhwal Himalaya. Annals of Forestry, 5: 126–135.Google Scholar
  2. Baduni NP, Sharma CM. 1999. Community structure and growing stock variation in Quercus floribunda forest on different aspects of Garhwal Himalaya. Bangladesh Journal of Forest Science, 28(2): 82–93.Google Scholar
  3. Banerjee SP, Chand S. 1981. Physico-chemical properties and moisture characteristics of soils as influenced by forest fire. Indian Forester, 107: 178–182.Google Scholar
  4. Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS. 1982. Nitrogen total. In: A.L. Page, R.H. Miller and D.R. Kieney (eds), Method of Soil Analysis- Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological methods (2nd edn.) Agronomy series No. 9. Madison. Wisconsin: Soil Science Society of America Inc., pp. 595–624.Google Scholar
  5. Champion HG, Seth SK. 1968. A Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India. New Delhi: Manager of Publications, Government of India Press, 404 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Curtis JT, McIntosh RP. 1950. The interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic phyto sociological characters. Ecology, 31: 434–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fenn ME, Poth MA, Aber JD, Boron JS, Bormann BJ, Johnson DW, Lenly AD, McNulty SG, Ryan DF, Stottlemeyer R. 1998. Nitrogen excess in North American ecosystems: predisposing factors, ecosystem responses and management strategies. Ecological Applications, 8: 706–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Franklin JF, Perry DA, Schowaltr ME, Harmon ME, Mckee A, Spies TA. 1989. Importance of ecological diversity in maintaining long-term site productivity. In: DA Perry, R Meurisse, B Thomas, R Miller, J Boyle, J Means, CR Perry and RF Powers (eds), Maintaining the long-term productivity of Pacific Northwest forest ecosystems. Portland OR: Timber Press, pp. 82–97.Google Scholar
  9. Gaur RD. 1999. Flora of the District Garhwal North West Himalaya (with ethnobotanical notes). Srinagar (Garhwal) India: TransMedia Publication. pp. 48–597.Google Scholar
  10. Holland PG, Steyn DG. 1975. Vegetational responses to latitudinal variations in slope angle and aspect. Journal of Biogeography, 2: 179–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huang W, Pohjonen V, Johansson S, Nashanda M, Katigula LO. 2003. Forest structure, Species composition and diversity of Tanzanian rain forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 173: 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knight DH. 1963. A distance method for constructing forest profile diagrams and obtaining structural data. Tropical Ecology, 4: 89–94Google Scholar
  13. Margalef DR. 1958. Information theory in ecology. Genetics and Systematics, 3: 36–71.Google Scholar
  14. Mishra A, Sharma CM, Sharma SD, Baduni NP. 2000. Effect of aspect on the structure of vegetation community of moist Bhavar and Tarai Shorea robusta forest in Central Himalaya. Indian Forester, 126(6): 634–642.Google Scholar
  15. Mishra R. 1968. Ecology Workbook. Calcutta: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., p. 244.Google Scholar
  16. Mitchell HL, Chandler RF. 1939. The nitrogen nutrition and growth of certain deciduous trees of Northeastern United States. Black Rock Forest Bulletin, 11: 1–94.Google Scholar
  17. Morwin HD, Peach PM. 1951. Exchangeability of soil potassium in and, silt and clay fractions as influenced by the nature of complementary exchangeable cations. Proceedings of Soil Science Society of America, 15: 125–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Murphy HP. 1958. The fertility status of some soils in Ethiopia. Ethiopian: College of Agriculture Press, pp. 258.Google Scholar
  19. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with Sodium bicarbonate. U.S.: Department of Agriculture Circular, p. 939.Google Scholar
  20. Phillips EA. 1959. Methods of Vegetation study. New York: Henry Holt & Co. Inc., p.107Google Scholar
  21. Pielou EC. 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 13: 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Putman RJ. 1994. Community Ecology. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Rahbek C. 2005. The role of spatial scale and the perception of large-scale species-richness patterns. Ecology Letters, 8: 224–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shank RE, Noorie EN. 1950. Microclimate vegetation in a small valley in eastern Tennessee. Ecology, 11: 531–539.Google Scholar
  25. Shannon CE, Wiener W. 1963. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, USA: University of Illinois Press, p.117Google Scholar
  26. Sharma CM, Baduni NP. 2000. Effect of aspects on the structure of some natural stands of Abies pindrow in Himalayan moist temperate forest. The Environmentalist, 20(4): 309–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sharma CM, Suyal S, Gairola S, Ghildiyal SK. 2009b. Species richness and diversity along an altitudinal gradient in moist temperate forest of Garhwal Himalaya. Journal of American Science, 5(5): 119–128.Google Scholar
  28. Sharma CM, Suyal S, Ghildiyal SK, Gairola S. 2009a. Role of Physiographic factors in distribution of Abies pindrow (Silver Fir) along an altitudinal gradient in Himalayan temperate Forests. The Environmentalist, 30(1): 76–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shivnath S, Gupta K, Rajwar GS. 1993. Analysis of forest vegetation in a part of Garhwal Himalaya. Recent Research in Ecology, Environment and Pollution, 6: 47–58.Google Scholar
  30. Simpson EH. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163: 688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Singh AK, Parsad A, Singh B. 1986. Avalability of Phosphorus and Potassium and its relationship with physico-chemical properties of some forest soils of Pali-range, (Shahodol, M.P.). Indian Forester, 112: 1094–1104.Google Scholar
  32. Slobodkin LB, Sanders HL. 1969. On the contribution of environmental predictability to species diversity. Brookhaven Symposium of Biology, 22: 82–95.Google Scholar
  33. Soromessa T, Teketay D, Demissew S. 2004. Ecological study of the vegetation in Gamo Gofa zone, Southern Ethopia. Tropical Ecology, 45(2): 209–221.Google Scholar
  34. Walkley A. 1947. An estimation of methods for determining organic Carbon and Nitrogen in soils. Journal of Agricultural Science, 25: 598–609.Google Scholar
  35. Whittaker RH. 1965. Dominance and diversity in land plant communities. Science, 147: 250–260.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Yadav AS, Gupta SK. 2006. Effect of micro-environment and human disturbance on the diversity of woody species in the Sariska Tiger Project in India. Forest Ecology and Management, 225: 178–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zobel DB, Mckee A, Hawk GM, Dyrness CT. 1976. Relationship of environment to the composition, structure and diversity of forest communities of the central western cascades of Oregon. Ecological Monographs, 46: 135–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • C.M. Sharma
    • 1
  • N.P. Baduni
    • 1
  • Sumeet Gairola
    • 1
  • S.K. Ghildiyal
    • 1
  • Sarvesh Suyal
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyHNB Garhwal UniversitySrinagar GarhwalIndia

Personalised recommendations