Journal of Forestry Research

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 226–230 | Cite as

Effects of sludge on germination and initial growth performance of Leucaena leucocephala seedlings in the nursery

  • G. M. A. Iqbal
  • S. M. S. Huda
  • M. Sujauddin
  • M. K. Hossain


A study was carried out to determine the influence of different types of sludges (municipal, industrial and residential) on field germination, growth and nodulation of L. leucocephala seedlings in the nursery. Before sowing of seeds, different combinations of sludges were incorporated with the nutrient deficient natural forest soils. Field germination, nodulation status and physical growth parameters of seedlings (shoot and root length, vigor index, collar diameter, leaf number, fresh and dry weight of shoot and root and total dry biomass increment) were recorded after three and six months of seed sowing. Field germination, nodulation status and growth parameters were varied significantly in the soil amended with sludges in comparison to control. The highest number of nodule was recorded from soil amended with residential sludge (1:1) and highest fresh and dry nodule weight was also found from the same combination in both three and six month old seedlings. In case of growth parameters, the highest growth was recorded from soil and residential sludge (1:1) combination compared to control. From the study, it can be recommended that soil amended with residential sludge (1:1) provide better field germination, growth and nodule formation of L. leucocephala in degraded soil.


Leucaena leucocephala Sludge Field germination Seedling growth Nodulation Vigor index 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alam, M.A., Matin, M.A., Hoque, M.M. and Hoque, A.T.M.R. 2004. Growth performance of Ipil ipil (Leucaena leucocephala (Lam) de Wit.) under different conditions at nursery stage in Bangladesh. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 7(6): 1062–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous, 1980. Firewood crops: Shrubs and Tree Species for Energy Production. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  3. Bates, T.E., Lane, T.H. and Frank, R. 1979. How and where to use sewage sludge in crop production. In: C. P. Mitchell (ed.), Nutrient Relations in Short Rotation Forestry. Forestry Research Paper, pp. 98–128.Google Scholar
  4. Byrom, K.L. and Bradshaw, A.D. 2001. The potential value of sewage sludge in land reclamation. In: J. E. Hall (ed.), Alternative Uses for Sewage Sludge. Proceedings of a conference organised by WRc Medmenham and held at the University of York, UK on 5–7 September 1989, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
  5. Cole, D.W., Henry, C.L., Schiess, P. and Zasoski, R.J. 1983. The role of forest in sludge and wastewater utilization programs. In: A. L. Page, T. L. Gleason III, J. E. Smith, Jr., I. K. Iskander and L. E. Sommers (eds.), Proc. of the 1983 Workshop on Utilization of Municipal Wastewater and Sludge on Land. University of California, Riverside, pp. 125–143.Google Scholar
  6. Das, S., Jones, N. and Islam, M.A. 1985. Research trials on Ipil ipil in Bangladesh. Banobiggyan Patrika, 14: 1–2. (in Bengali).Google Scholar
  7. Duke, J.A. 1981. Handbook of Legumes of World Economic Importance. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Gardiner, D.T., Miller, R.W., Badamchian, B., Azzari, A.S. and Sisson, D.R. 1995. Effects of repeated sewage sludge application on plant accumulation of heavy metals. Agri. Ecosyst. Environ, 55: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hossain, M.K. and Miller, H.G. 1994. Sewage sludge fertilization in forest ecosystem. The Malaysian Forester, 57-4.Google Scholar
  10. Hue, N.V. 1995. Sewage sludge. In: Rechcigl, J.E. (Ed.), Soil Amendments and Environmental Quality. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 199–247.Google Scholar
  11. Jorba, M. and Andres, P. 2000. Effects of sewage sludge on the establishment of the herbaceous ground cover after soil restoration. J. Soil Water Conserv, 3: 322–326.Google Scholar
  12. Khan, B.M., Mridha, M.A.U., Hossain, M.K. and Xu, H.L. 2002. Nursery practice of growth on Ipil ipil [Leucaena leucocephala (Lam) de Wit.] by using beneficial microbial inoculant (Effective Microorganisms). Nature Farming and Environment, 3(1): 15–22.Google Scholar
  13. Kulling, D., Stadelmann, F. and Herter, U. 2001. Sewage Sludge-Fertilizer or Waste? UKWIR Conference, Brussels.Google Scholar
  14. Labrecque, M., Teodorescu, T.I. and Daigle, S. 2006. Effect of wastewater sludge on growth and heavy metal bioaccumulation of two Salix species. Plant and Soil, 171(2): 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Logan, T.J. and Chaney, R.L. 1983. Utilization of municipal wastewaters and sludge on land-metals. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Utilization of Municipal Wastewater and Sludge on Land, Denver, CO, pp. 235–323.Google Scholar
  16. Logan, T.J. and Harrison, B.J. 1995. Physical characteristics of alkaline stabilized sewage sludge (N-vitro soil) and their effects on soil properties. J. Environ. Qual, 24: 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Luna, R.K. 1996. Plantation Trees. International Book Distributors. Dehra Dun, India. 975 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Merzlaya, G.E., Zyabcina, G.A., Nesterovich, I.A., Fomcina, T.P. 1995. Agroecologicheskaya ocenka ispolsovaniya osagkov stochnych vod. Agrochimiya, 5: 92–96 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  19. Osman, K.T., Rahman, M.M. and Barua, P. 2001. Effects of some forest tree species on soil properties in Chittagong University Campus, Bangladesh. Indian Forester, 127(4): 431–442.Google Scholar
  20. Peles, J.D., Brewer, S.R. and Barrett, G.W. 1996. Metal uptake by agricultural plant species grown in sludge-amended soil following ecosystem restoration practices. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol, 57: 917–923.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ramachandran, V. and D’ Soura, T.J. 1998. Plant uptake of cadmium, zinc, and manganese in soils amended with sewage sludge and city compost. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol, 61: 347–354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Riha, S.J., Naylor, L. and Senesac, G.P. 1983. Hybrid poplar production using municipal sewage sludge as a fertilizer resource. New York State Energy Research and Development Activity. 11 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Sa’nchez-Monedero, M.A., Mondini, C., De Nobili, M., Leita, L., Roig, A. 2004. Land applications of biosolids. Soil response to different stabilization degree or treated organic matter. Waste Management, 24(4): 325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Selivanovskaya, S.Yu., Latypova, V.Z., Naumova, R.P., Ravzieva, G.M. 1997. On the possibility of involvement of microelements of sewage sludge into biogeochemical circulation. Environ. Radioecol. Appl. Ecol, 1: 13–19.Google Scholar
  25. Selivanovskaya, S.Yu and Latypova, V.Z. 1999. Nekotorye aspecty normirovaniya kachestva i utulizazii osadkov stochnich vod. Ecologicheskaya Chimiya, 8(2): 119–129 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  26. Selivanovskaya, S.Yu and Latypova, V.Z. 2006. Effects of composted sewage sludge on microbial biomass, activity and pine seedlings in nursery forest. Waste Management, 26:1253–1258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sing, R.P. and Agrawal, M. 2007. Potential benefits and risks of land application of sewage sludge. Waste Management, In Press.Google Scholar
  28. Van den Berg, J.J. 1993. Effects of sewage sludge disposal. Land Degrad. Rehabil, 4: 407–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wu, Q.T., Hei, L., Wong, J.W., Schwartz, C. and Morel J.L. 2007. Co-cropping for phyto-separation of zinc and potassium from sewage sludge. Chemosphere, In pressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University and Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. M. A. Iqbal
    • 1
  • S. M. S. Huda
    • 1
  • M. Sujauddin
    • 1
  • M. K. Hossain
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Forestry and Environmental SciencesUniversity of ChittagongChittagongBangladesh

Personalised recommendations