Advertisement

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 323–331 | Cite as

Mapping Bioethics in Latin America: History, Theoretical Models, and Scientific Output

  • Lucas F. GarciaEmail author
  • Marcia S. Fernandes
  • Jonathan D. Moreno
  • Jose R. Goldim
Original Research

Abstract

Objective: To present a narrative review of the history of bioethics in Latin America and of scientific output in this interdisciplinary field. Methods: This was a mixed-methods study. Results: A total of 1458 records were retrieved, of which 1167 met the inclusion criteria. According to the Web of Science classification, the predominant topics of study were medical ethics (n= 488), social sciences and medicine (n= 354), and environmental and public health topics (n= 279). Four themes of bioethics output in the Latin American literature have emerged: (a) issues involving the beginning and end of life, (b) ethics in human research, (c) patient–provider relationships, and (d) ethics training for health professionals. Conclusion: Although bioethics is a growing interdisciplinary field in Latin America, its academic impact is still very low, and programmes are highly concentrated in large urban centres in a few countries. Challenges includes the regional and international impact of local scientific output.

Keywords

History of bioethics Mixed method research Latin America Latin American bioethics 

Notes

References

  1. Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death. 1968. A definition of irreversible coma: Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death. JAMA 205(6): 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Álvarez-Díaz, J.A. 2012. Bioética latinoamericana o bioética en Latinoamérica [Latin American bioethics or bioethics in Latin America?]? Revista Latinoamericana de Bioética 12(1): 10–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bae, J-M. 2014. Narrative reviews. Epidemiology and Health 36: e2014018.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bardin, L. 2011. Análise de conteúdo [Content analysis]. São Paulo: Edições 70.Google Scholar
  5. Bazeley, P. 2013. Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies. London: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2013. Principles of biomedical ethics, 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Beecher, H.K. 1959. Experimentation in man. JAMA 169(5): 461–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 1962. Some fallacies and errors in the application of the principle of consent in human experimentation. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 3(2): 141–146.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. ———. 1966. Ethics and clinical research. New England Journal of Medicine 274(24): 1354–1360.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. ———. 1969. After the definition of irreversible coma. New England Journal of Medicine 281(19): 1070–1071.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Caplan, A., and R. Arp (eds). 2014. Contemporary debates in bioethics. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Cerqueira, R.C. 2017. Revistas científicas na América Latina: o caso do SciELO [Scientific journals in Latin America: The case of SciELO]. http://www.revistahcsm.coc.fiocruz.br/revistas-cientificas-na-america-latina-o-caso-do-scielo/. Accessed August 10, 2018.
  13. Clotet, J. 2006. Bioética: Uma aproximação [Bioethics: an approach], 2nd ed. Porto Alegre: Edipucrs.Google Scholar
  14. Čović, A., and T.S. Hoffmann. 2007. Integrative bioethik: Beiträge des 1 [Integrative bioethics]. Berlin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Creswell, J.W. 2014. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Garrafa, V., and D. Porto. 2003. Intervention bioethics: A proposal for peripheral countries in a context of power and injustice. Bioethics 17(5–6): 399–416.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. ———. 2000. Radiografía bioética de Brasil [A bioethical radiograph of Brazil]. Acta Bioethica 6(1).Google Scholar
  18. Garrafa, V. 2006. Apresentando a bioética [Introducing bioethics]. Universitas. História 2 (1): 7–17.Google Scholar
  19. Genro, B.P., C.F. Francisconi, and J.R. Goldim. 2014. [Clinical bioethics: Twenty years of experience in the Hospital de Clínicas of Porto Alegre]. Revista Da AMRIGS 58(1): 83–88.Google Scholar
  20. Georgetown University. 1971. “Panorama: Institute for bioethics established at Georgetown University. BioScience 21(21): 1090–10e92.Google Scholar
  21. Gracia, D. 1991. Procedimientos de decisión en ética clinica [Decision procedures in clinical ethics]. Madrid: Eudema.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 1998. Bioética clínica [Clinical bioethics]. Bogota: El Búho.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2007. Fundamentos de bioética [Fundamentals of bioethics]. Madrid: Editorial Triacastela.Google Scholar
  24. Goldim, J.R. 2009a. [Complex bioethics: A comprehensive approach to decision making process]. Revista AMRIGS 53(1): 58–63.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 2009b. Revisiting the beginning of bioethics: The contribution of Fritz Jahr (1927). Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 52(3): 377–380.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Goldim, J.R., and M.S. Fernandes. 2011. From reverence for life to bioethics: Albert Schweitzer, a bioethics precursor. Jahr 2(4): 505–509.Google Scholar
  27. Haggarty, L. 1996. What is content analysis? Medical Teacher 18(2): 99–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hodelín Tablada, R. 2011. Bioética anglosajona en su 40 aniversario: El traspaso hacia América Latina y su llegada a Cuba [Anglo-Saxon bioethics in its 40th anniversary: The transfer to Latin America and its arrival to Cuba]. Medisan 15(11): 1674–1686.Google Scholar
  29. Irrazábal, G. 2015. Acerca de la emergencia y consolidación de la bioética como disciplina desde una perspectiva sociológica [On the emergence and consolidation of bioethics as a discipline, as seen from a sociological perspective]. História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos 22(4): 1121–1140.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Jahr, F. 1926. [Life sciences and ethics: Old knowledge in new clothing]. Die Mittelschule. Zeitschrift Für Das Gesamte Mittlere Schulwesen 40: 604–606.Google Scholar
  31. ———. 1927. [Bio-ethics: A review of the ethical relationships of humans to animals and plants]. Kosmos 24(4): 2–4.Google Scholar
  32. Jonsen, A.R. 1998. The birth of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lolas Stepke, F. 2005. Rehistoriar la bioética en LatinoAmerica: La contribución de James Drane [Remaking bioethics’ history in Latin America: James Drane’s contribution]. Acta Bioethica 11(2): 161–167.Google Scholar
  34. ———. 2006. Bioethics at the Pan American Health Organization: Origins, development, and challenges. Acta Bioethica 12(1): 113–119.Google Scholar
  35. ———. 2010. Acta Bioethica: Una década de historia [Acta Bioethica: A decade of history]. Acta Bioethica 16 (2): 115–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moreno, J.D. 2016. Acid brothers: Henry Beecher, Timothy Leary, and the psychedelic of the century. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 59(1): 107–121.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Muzur, A., and H-M. Sass. 2012. Fritz Jahr and the foundations of global bioethics: The future of integrative bioethics, vol 37. LIT Verlag Münster.Google Scholar
  38. Pellegrino, E.D., and D.C Thomasma. 1993. The virtues in medical practice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Pessini, L., A. Sobral, and M.S. Goncalves. 2007. Bioética na Ibero-América: História e perspectivas [Ibero-American bioethics: History and perspectives]. Centro Universitário São Camilo.Google Scholar
  40. Pessini, L., C.P. de Barchifontaine, and F. Lolas Stepke. 2010. Ibero-American bioethics. Philosophy and Medicine, vol. 106. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Porto, D., and V. Garrafa. 2009. Bioética de intervenção: Considerações sobre a economia de Mercado [Intervention bioethics: Considerations on market economy]. Revista Bioética 13(1): 1122–1132.Google Scholar
  42. Potter, V.R. 1970. Bioethics, science of survival. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 14(1): 127–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. ———. 1971a. Reflections: Bioethics. BioScience 21(21): 1088–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. ———. 1971b. Bioethics: Bridge to the future. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersy: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  45. ———. 1987. Leopold, Aldo land ethic revisited—2 kinds of bioethics. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 30(2): 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. ———. 1999. Fragmented ethics and “Bridge Bioethics.” Hastings Center Report 29(1): 38–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rinčić, I., and A. Muzur. 2011. Fritz Jahr: The invention of bioethics and beyond. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 54(4): 550–556.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Rodríguez del Pozo, P. and J.A. Mainetti. 2009. Bioética sin más: The past, present, and future of a Latin American bioethics. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18(3): 270–279.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Rothman, D.J. 2003. Strangers at the bedside: A history of how law and bioethics transformed medical decision making, 2nd ed. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  50. Schramm, F.R., and M. Kottow. 2001. Principios bioéticos en salud pública: Limitaciones y propuestas [Bioethical principles in public health: Limitations and proposals]. Cadernos de Saude Publica 17(4): 949–956.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Schramm, F.R. 2008. Bioética da proteção: Ferramenta válida para enfrentar problemas morais na era da globalização [Bioethics of protection: Valid tool to face moral problems in the globalization era]. Revista Bioética 16(1): 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sinardet, E. 2004. Special document 10 years PAHO bioethics unit (1994–2004). Acta Bioethica 10(1): 7–10.Google Scholar
  53. UNESCO, and Redbioética. 2017. Redbioética—Rede Latino-Americana e do caribe de bioética da UNESCO | United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [Redbioetica—Latin American and Caribbean Network of Bioethics]. Representação Da UNESCO No Brasil. http://www.unesco.org/new/pt/brasilia/about-this-office/networks/specialized-communities/specialized-communities-shs/redbioetica/. Accessed April 10, 2017.
  54. Universidade de Brasília (UnB). 2017. Cátedra UNESCO de bioética da Universidade de Brasília [UNESCO Chair in Bioethics at the University of Brasilia]. https://bioetica.catedraunesco.unb.br/?page_id=72. Accessed April 10, 2017.
  55. Veatch, R.M. 1997. Medical ethics, 2nd ed. Jones & Bartlett Learning.Google Scholar
  56. Walter, J.K, and E.P Klein. 2003. The story of bioethics: From seminal works to contemporary explorations. Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bioethics DivisionHospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegrePorto AlegreBrazil
  2. 2.Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations