Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 589–602 | Cite as

What Is the Good of It—Ethical Controls of Human Subject Health Research?

Curtin University Annual Ethics Lecture
  • Robert FrenchEmail author
Original Research


The term “ethics” covers a multitude of virtues and possibly some sins where ethical perspectives differ. Given the diversity of ethical philosophies there is a question about what common ground can, or should, inform health research ethics. At a minimum it must be consistent with the law. Beyond that, ethics embraces a variety of possible approaches. This raises the question—what criteria are applied in determining the appropriate approach and what standards by way of quality control are applied to its decisional application by ethics committees or other authorities exercising responsibility in this difficult area. The particular issue of ethical perspectives on the use of “big data” in medical research also raises complex issues for consideration.


Human research ethics Bioethics Big data Consent Privacy Research ethics 


  1. Al-Lamee, R. 2017. Patient information leaflet, version 1.6, 15 April 2014, provided 7 November.Google Scholar
  2. Al-Lamee, R., D. Thompson, H.M. Dehbi, et al. 2017. Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): A double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Nov 1: pii: S0140-6736(0117)32714-32719 [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  3. Alving, A.S., B. Craige, T.N. Pullman, C.M. Whorton, R. Jones, and L. Eichelberger. 1948. Procedures used at Stateville Penitentiary for the testing of potential antimalarial agents. Journal of Clinical Investigation 27(3 Pt 2): 2–5.Google Scholar
  4. Beecher, H. 1961. Surgery as placebo. A quantitative study of bias. JAMA 176(13): 1102–1107.Google Scholar
  5. Brim, R.L., and F.G. Miller. 2013. The potential benefit of the placebo effect in sham-controlled trials: Implications for risk-benefit assessments and informed consent. Journal Medical Ethics 39(11): 703–707.Google Scholar
  6. Brody, H., S.E. Leonard, J.B. Nie, and P. Weindling. 2014. United States responses to Japanese wartime inhuman experimentation after World War II: National security and wartime exigency. Cambridge Quarterly Heath Ethics 23(2): 220–230.Google Scholar
  7. Caplan, A.L. 1989. The meaning of the Holocaust for bioethics. Retrieved from Accessed October 23, 2018.
  8. Care Act 2014 (UK) Ch 2 “Health Research Authority”; Medicine for Human Use (Clinical Trials) Regulations 2004 (UK).Google Scholar
  9. Chattopadyay, S., and R. De Vries. 2013. Respect for cultural diversity in bioethics is an ethical imperative. Journal of Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16(4): 639–645.Google Scholar
  10. Cobb, L.A., G.I. Thomas, D.H. Dillard, K.A. Merendino, R.A. Bruce. 1959. An evaluation of internal-mammary-artery ligation by a double-blind technic. New England Journal Medicine 260(22): 1115–1118.Google Scholar
  11. Comfort, N. 2009. The prisoner as model organism: Malaria research at Stateville Penitentiary. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40(3): 190–203.Google Scholar
  12. Convention for the protection of human rights and dignity of the human being with regard to the application of biology and medicine: Convention on human rights and biomedicine.1997. Accessed October 23, 2018).
  13. Craik, E.M. 2015. The Hippocratic corpus: Content and context. Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Declaration of Helsinki (World Medical Association, 1964) art33 ( Accessed October 23, 2018.
  15. European Parliament Directive 2001/20/EC and of the Council, 4 April 2001 Accessed December 2017.
  16. French, R. 2003. Ethics at the beginning and ending of life. Accessed October 23, 2018.
  17. Guraya, S.Y., N.J.M. London, and S.S. Guraya. 2014. Ethics in medical research. Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure 2(3): 121–126.Google Scholar
  18. Johns, C.H.W. 1904. Babylonian and Assyrian laws, contracts and letters, 64 [218]. Law Book Exchange Ltd.Google Scholar
  19. Kotata, G. 2017. Unbelievable: Heart stents fail to ease chest pain. New York Times, November 2. Accessed October 23, 2018.
  20. London, A.J., and J.B. Kadane. 2002. Placebos that harm: Sham surgery controls in clinical trials. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 11(5): 413–427.Google Scholar
  21. Macklin, R. 2014. Respect for cultural diversity and pluralism. In Handbook of global bioethics, edited by H. ten Have, and B. Gordijn, 153–168. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maclean, C. 1818. Results of an investigation respecting epidemic and pestilential diseases. London: Thomas and George Underwood.Google Scholar
  23. Maehle, A. 1999. Drugs on trial: Experimental pharmacology and therapeutic innovation in the eighteenth century. Clio Medica 53: 194–195. Wellcome Institute Series in the History of Medicine.Google Scholar
  24. McNeil, D.G. 2010. US Apologizes for syphilis testing in Guatemala. New York Times, October 1. Accessed October 23 2018 .
  25. Millum, J. 2012. Canada’s new ethical guidelines for humans: A critique and comparison with the United States. Canadian Medical Journal 184(6): 657–661.Google Scholar
  26. Mittelstadt, B.D., and L. Floridi. 2016. The ethics of big data: Current and foreseeable issues in biomedical contexts. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Netherlands .Google Scholar
  27. Moreno, J.D. 2005. Is there an ethicist in the house? On the cutting edge of bioethics. USA: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  28. National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2007a (Updated 2018). The National Health and Medical Research Council, the Australian Research Council and Universities Australia. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. Accessed 23 Oct 2018.
  29. National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. 2007b (Updated 2018). Chapter 2.2, p16-18. The National Health and Medical Research Council, the Australian Research Council and Universities Australia. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. Accessed 23 Oct 2018.
  30. Schiller, F. A list of famous Fredrich Schiller quotes. Ranker 2017 Accessed 23 Oct 2018.
  31. Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences. 2015. Research with human subjects: A manual for practitioners, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
  32. Semeniuk I., and S. Reverby. 2010. A shocking discovery. Nature 7467(7316): 645.Google Scholar
  33. Singer, P. 2000. Writings on an ethical life. New York: Harper Collins Books.Google Scholar
  34. Somerville, M. 2000. The ethical canary—Science, society and the human spirit. Toronto: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  35. Swift, T., and R. Huxtable. 2013. The ethics of sham surgery in Parkinson’s disease: Back to the future? Bioethics 27(4): 175–185.Google Scholar
  36. Tenery, R., H. Rakatansky, F.A. Riddick, M.S. Goldrich, L.J. Morse, J.M. O’Bannon, et al. 2002. Surgical “placebo” trials. Annals of Surgery 235(2): 303–307.Google Scholar
  37. The Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation, 2005) art 3(2). Accessed October 23, 2018.
  38. Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No 10, US Government Printing Office 1949. 2: 181–182.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Pty Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chancellery, M460AThe University of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations