Are ME/CFS Patient Organizations “Militant”?
- 348 Downloads
Myalgic encephalomyelitis or chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a contested illness category. This paper investigates the common claim that patients with ME/CFS—and by extension, ME/CFS patient organizations (POs)—exhibit “militant” social and political tendencies. The paper opens with a history of the protracted scientific disagreement over ME/CFS. We observe that ME/CFS POs, medical doctors, and medical researchers exhibit clear differences in opinion over how to conceptualize this illness. However, we identify a common trope in the discourse over ME/CFS: the claim of “militant” patient activism. Scrutinizing this charge, we find no compelling evidence that the vast majority of patients with ME/CFS, or the POs representing them, have adopted any such militant political policies or behaviours. Instead, we observe key strategic similarities between ME/CFS POs in the United Kingdom and the AIDs activist organizations of the mid-1980s in the United States which sought to engage scientists using the platform of public activism and via scientific publications. Finally, we explore the contours of disagreement between POs and the medical community by drawing on the concept of epistemic injustice. We find that widespread negative stereotyping of patients and the marginalization and exclusion of patient voices by medical authorities provides a better explanation for expressions of frustration among patients with ME/CFS.
KeywordsEpistemic injustice Doctor–patient communication Healthcare ethics ME/CFS Patient activism
- #ME Action 2016. Progress in ME/CFS patient advocacy: Overcoming the militant meme & why we must keep evolving. #ME Action, February 24. http://www.meaction.net/2016/02/24/progress-in-mecfs-patient-advocacy-overcoming-the-militant-meme-why-we-must-keep-evolving/.Accessed October 20, 2017.
- Chew-Graham, C., C. Dowrick, A. Wearden, et al. 2010. Making the diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalitis in primary care: A qualitative study. BMC Family Practice 11(2): 16.Google Scholar
- Collins, H., and T. Pinch. 2008. Dr. Golem: How to think about medicine. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gaab, J., C. Blease, C. Locher, and H. Gerger. 2016). Go open: A plea for transparency in psychotherapy. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice 3(2): 175.Google Scholar
- IOM. 2015. Beyond myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: Redefining an illness. National Academies Press. Institute of Medicine.Google Scholar
- Irwin, A. (2002). Citizen science: A study of people, expertise and sustainable development. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Kennedy, B., D. Stephenson, and N. Watson. 2016. First-Tier Tribunal, Information Rights. Appeal Number: ΕΑ/2015/0269. 20: 12–18. http://informationrights.decisions.tribunals.gov.uk//DBFiles/Decision/i1854/Queen% 20Mary% 20University% 20of% 20London% 20EA-2015-0269. Accessed October 20, 2017.
- Lakatos, I. 1970. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Criticism and the growth of knowledge, edited by I. Lakatos and S. Musgrave, 91–195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Marsh, S. 2011. Doctor’s hate mail is sent by the people he tried to cure. The Times, August 6.Google Scholar
- McKie, R. 2011. Chronic fatigue syndrome researchers face death threats. The Observer, August 20. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2011/aug/21/chronic-fatigue-syndrome-myalgic-encephalomyelitis. Accessed 21 June 2018.
- NICE. 2018. NICE announces next steps in updating its guidlines on ME/CFS. February 18. https://www.nice.org.uk/news/article/nice-announces-next-steps-in-updating-its-guideline-on-me-cfs. Accessed 21 June 2018.
- Núñez, M., J. Fernández-Solà, E. Nuñez, J. M. Fernández-Huerta, T. Godás-Sieso, and E. Gomez-Gil. 2011. Health-related quality of life in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: Group cognitive behavioural therapy and graded exercise versus usual treatment. A randomised controlled trial with 1 year of follow-up. Clinical Rheumatology 30(3): 381–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pemberton, M. 2011. Protestors have got it all wrong about ME. The Times, August 29.Google Scholar
- Steven, I.D., B. McGrath, F. Quereshi, et al. 2000. General practitioners’ beliefs, attitudes, and reported actions towards chronic fatigue syndrome. Australian Family Physician 29: 80–85Google Scholar
- Thomas, M.A., and A.P. Smith. 2005. Primary healthcare provision and chronic fatigue syndrome: A survey of patients’ and general practitioners’ beliefs. BMC Family Practice 6(1): 49.Google Scholar
- Twisk, F., and K.J. Geraghty. 2015. Deviant cellular and physiological responses to exercise in myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome. JJ Physiology 1(2): 1–6.Google Scholar
- Van Hoof, E. 2009. The doctor–patient relationship in chronic fatigue syndrome: Survey of patient perspectives. Quality in Primary Care 17(4): 263–270.Google Scholar
- Wilshire, C., T. Kindlon, A. Matthees, and S. McGrath. 2017. Can patients with chronic fatigue syndrome really recover after graded exercise or cognitive behavioural therapy? A critical commentary and preliminary re-analysis of the PACE trial. Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior 5(1): 43–56.Google Scholar