Including People with Dementia in Research: An Analysis of Australian Ethical and Legal Rules and Recommendations for Reform
- 1.1k Downloads
Research is crucial to advancing knowledge about dementia, yet the burden of the disease currently outpaces research activity. Research often excludes people with dementia and other cognitive impairments because researchers and ethics committees are concerned about issues related to capacity, consent, and substitute decision-making. In Australia, participation in research by people with cognitive impairment is governed by a national ethics statement and a patchwork of state and territorial laws that have widely varying rules. We contend that this legislative variation precludes a consistent approach to research governance and participation and hinders research that seeks to include people with impaired capacity. In this paper, we present key ethical principles, provide a comprehensive review of applicable legal rules in Australian states and territories, and highlight significant differences and ambiguities. Our analysis includes recommendations for reform to improve clarity and consistency in the law and reduce barriers that may exclude persons with dementia from participating in ethically approved research. Our recommendations seek to advance the national decision-making principles recommended by the Australian Law Reform Commission, which emphasize the rights of all adults to make their own decisions and for those with impaired capacity to have access to appropriate supports to help them make decisions that affect their lives.
KeywordsResearch ethics Law Dementia Consent Substitute decision-making Advance directives
- Alzheimer’s Australia. 2017. Key facts and statistics. 2017. Alzheimer’s Australia, February. https://fightdementia.org.au/national/statistics. Accessed April 10, 2017.
- Alzheimer’s Disease International. 2015. World alzheimer report 2015: The global impact of dementia: An analysis of prevalence, incidence, cost and trends. http://www.alz.co.uk/research/world-report-2015. Accessed April 10, 2017.
- Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2016. Summary of findings: About cause of death statistics. http://abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/3303.0~2014~Main%20Features~Summary%20of%20Findings~1. Accessed April 10, 2017.
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. n.d. National health priority areas. http://www.aihw.gov.au/national-health-priority-areas/. Accessed May 10, 2017.
- Australian Law Reform Commission. 2014. Equality, capacity and disability in Commonwealth laws. Report No 124. Google Scholar
- Department of Health. 2012. WA health research governance policy and procedures. Research Development Unit, Department of Health, Perth.Google Scholar
- Duron, E., M. Boulay, J.S. Vidal, et al. 2013. Capacity to consent to biomedical research’s evaluation among older cognitively impaired patient. A study to validate the university of California brief assessment of capacity to consent questionnaire in French among older cognitively impaired patients. Journal Nutritional Health Aging 17(4): 385–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Government of South Australia. n.d. Advance Care Directive Form. http://www.advancecaredirectives.sa.gov.au/upload/home/ACDFormSecure.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2017.
- Guideline Adaptation Committee. 2016. Clinical practice guidelines and principles of care for people with dementia. Sydney: Guideline Adaption Committee. http://sydney.edu.au/medicine/cdpc/documents/resources/LAVER_Dementia_Guidleines_recommendations_PRVW5.pdf. Accessed April 10, 2017.
- Legislative Assembly for the Australian Capital Territory. 2015. Powers of Attorney Amendment Bill 2015 explanatory statement. http://www.legislation.act.gov.au/es/db_53083/20151119-62368/pdf/db_53083.pdf .. Accessed April 10, 2017.
- National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). 2007. National statement on ethical conduct in human research (2007). Australian Government, Canberra.Google Scholar
- Nishimura, A., J. Carey, P.J. Erwin, J.C. Tilburt, M.H. Murad, and J.B. McCormick. 2013. Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: A systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials. BMC Medical Ethics 14(28): 1–15.Google Scholar
- NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT). 2016. NCAT Guardianship Division fact sheet—Clinical trials. http://www.ncat.nsw.gov.au/Documents/gd_factsheet_clinical_trials.pdf. Accessed April 10, 2017.
- NSW Government. 2017a. National mutual acceptance of scientific and ethical review of multi-centre human research. http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/ethics/Pages/nma.aspx. Accessed May 10, 2017.
- ———. 2017b. Review of the Guardianship Act 1987. http://www.lawreform.justice.nsw.gov.au/Pages/lrc/lrc_current_projects/Guardianship/Guardianship.aspx>. Accessed May 10, 2017.
- Office of the Public Advocate. n.d. Section 42T certificate—Continuing medical research procedure. http://www.publicadvocate.vic.gov.au/our-services/publications-forms/medical-consent/medical-research-forms/85-section-42t-continuing-certificate. Accessed May 10, 2017.
- ———. 2013. Section 42T certificate. http://www.publicadvocate.vic.gov.au/our-services/publications-forms/medical-consent/medical-research-forms/84-section-42t-certificate. Accessed May 10, 2017.
- Parker, M. 2013. Double standards in special medical research: Questioning the discrepancy between requirements for medical research involving incompetent adults and medical research involving children. Journal of Law and Medicine 21: 47–52.Google Scholar
- Porteri, C., and C Petrini. 2015. Research involving subjects with Alzheimer’s disease in Italy: The possible role of family members. BMC Medical Ethics 16(12): 1–8.Google Scholar
- Queensland Government. 2004. Advance health directive. http://www.justice.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/15982/advance-health-directive.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2017.
- Seaman, J.B., L. Terhorst, A. Gentry, A. Hunsaker, L.S. Parker, and J.H. Lingler. 2015. Psychometric properties of decisional capacity screening tool for individuals contemplating participation in Alzheimer’s disease research. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 46(1): 1–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee. 2016. Preliminary Submission to NSW Law Reform Commission Review of the NSW Guardianship Act 1987. http://www.lawreform.justice.nsw.gov.au/Documents/Current-projects/Guardianship/Preliminary-submissions/PGA40.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2017.
- Turner, E. 2015. Substitute decision-making for participation in medical research. Australian Health Law Bulletin (May): 66–71.Google Scholar
- Victorian Law Reform Commission. 2012. Guardianship final report. Report No 24.Google Scholar