The Role of a Hospital Ethics Consultation Service in Decision-Making for Unrepresented Patients
- 591 Downloads
Despite increased calls for hospital ethics committees to serve as default decision-makers about life-sustaining treatment (LST) for unrepresented patients who lack decision-making capacity or a surrogate decision-maker and whose wishes regarding medical care are not known, little is known about how committees currently function in these cases. This was a retrospective cohort study of all ethics committee consultations involving decision-making about LST for unrepresented patients at a large academic hospital from 2007 to 2013. There were 310 ethics committee consultations, twenty-five (8.1 per cent) of which involved unrepresented patients. In thirteen (52.0 per cent) cases, the ethics consultants evaluated a possible substitute decision-maker identified by social workers and/or case managers. In the remaining cases, the ethics consultants worked with the medical team to contact previous healthcare professionals to provide substituted judgement, found prior advance care planning documents, or identified the patient’s best interest as the decision-making standard. In the majority of cases, the final decision was to limit or withdraw LST (72 per cent) or to change code status to Do Not Resuscitate/Do Not Intubate (12 per cent). Substitute decision-makers who had been evaluated through the ethics consultation process and who made the final decision alone were more likely to continue LST than cases in which physicians made the final decision (50 per cent vs 6.3 per cent, p = 0.04). In our centre, the primary role of ethics consultants in decision-making for unrepresented patients is to identify appropriate decision-making standards. In the absence of other data suggesting that ethics committees, as currently constituted, are ready to serve as substitute decision-makers for unrepresented patients, caution is necessary before designating these committees as default decision-makers.
KeywordsBest interests Ethics committees Ethics consultation Decision-making Surrogates Unrepresented
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Support for this research was provided by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (5T32HL007633-30). The sponsors had no role in the design of the study, the collection and analysis of the data, preparation of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the final manuscript for publication.
- American Bar Association. 2014. Default surrogate consents statutes as of June 2014. Available at: http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/law_aging/2014_default_surrogate_consent_statutes.authcheckdam.pdf. Accessed November 17, 2015.
- Brock, D. 1995. Death and dying: Euthanasia and sustaining life: Ethical issues. In Encyclopedia of Bioethics, edited by E. Reich, 563–572. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Courtwright, A.M., S. Brackett, A. Cist, M.C. Cremens, E.L. Krakauer, and E.M. Robinson. 2013. The changing composition of a hospital ethics committee: A tertiary care center’s experience. Hospital Ethics Committee Forum 26(1): 59–68.Google Scholar
- Karp, N., and E. Wood. 2003. Incapacitated and alone: Healthcare decision making for unbefriended older people. Washington, DC: American Bar Association Commission on Law and Aging.Google Scholar
- Nalichowski, R., D. Keogh, C.H. Chueh, and S.N. Murphy. 2006. Calculating the benefits of a research patient data repository. American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium Proceedings 6(1): 1044.Google Scholar
- O’Donnell, H., R.S. Phillips, N. Wenger, J. Teno, R.B. Davis, M.B. Hamel. 2003. Preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation among patients 80 years or older: The views of patients and their physicians. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 4(3): 139–144.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- ———. 2014. The growing power of healthcare ethics committees heightens due process concerns. Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 15(2): 425–447.Google Scholar
- Pope, T., and T. Sellers. 2011. Legal briefing: The unbefriended: Making healthcare decisions for patients without surrogates (Part 2). Journal of Clinic Ethics 23(2): 177–192.Google Scholar
- Veterans Administration. Protection of patient rights. sec.17.32 Informed consent and advance care planning. http://www.benefits.va.gov/warms/docs/regs/38CFR/BOOKI/PART17/s17_32.DOC. Accessed April 7, 2014.